Managing endings in a longitudinal study: Respect for persons

Research in Science Education

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 123-135

  Reiss, Michael J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Pupil views; Research ethics; Respect

Indexed keywords

EID: 23744492920     PISSN: 0157244X     EISSN: 15731898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11165-004-3436-z     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. S. J. Ball 1984 Beachside reconsidered: Reflections on a methodological apprenticeship In: R. G. Burgess Ed. The research process in educational settings: Ten case studies Falmer London 69-96
2. S. Delamont 2002 Fieldwork in educational settings: Methods, pitfalls and perspectives 2 Routledge London
3. Gardner, J., Pring, R., & Lewis, A. (2003). Ethical guidelines for educational research: Draft for consultation among members. Research Intelligence, 82, 2-9.
4. L. Murdin 2000 How much is enough? Endings in psychotherapy and counselling Routledge London
5. A. Obholzer & V. Z. Roberts 1994 The unconscious at work: Individual and organizational stress in the human services Routledge London
6. N. Phillips & C. Hardy 2002 Discourse analysis: Investigating processes of social construction Sage Thousand Oaks, CA
7. M. J. Reiss 2000 Understanding science lessons: Five years of science teaching Open University Press Buckingham, UK
8. Rhedding-Jones, J. (1997). The writing on the wall: Doing a feminist post-structural doctorate. Gender and Education, 9, 193-206. 10.1080/09540259721367
9. M. Wetherell S. Taylor & S. J. Yates 2001 Discourse theory and practice: A reader Sage London
10. Whittier, D. K., & Simon, W. (2001). The fuzzy matrix of 'Ms Type' in intrapsychic sexual scripting. Sexualities, 4, 139-165.
11. Wolcott, H. F. (1977). Teachers versus technocrats. Unpublished manuscript, Centre for Educational Policy and Management, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR.