Comparison of impedance cardiography and thermodilution-derived measurements of stroke volume and cardiac output at rest and during exercise testing

Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 141-147

  Scherhag, A ^a   Kaden, J J ^a   Kentschke, E ^a   Sueselbeck, T ^a   Borggrefe, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cardiac output; Electrical bioimpedance; Exercise testing; Haemodynamic monitoring; Impedance cardiography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BICYCLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY HEMODYNAMICS; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ELECTRICITY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HEART OUTPUT; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HUMAN; IMPEDANCE CARDIOGRAPHY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; REST; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; THERMODILUTION;

AGED; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CARDIOGRAPHY, IMPEDANCE; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERIOSCLEROSIS; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; GERMANY; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REST; STATISTICS; STROKE VOLUME; THERMODILUTION;

EID: 23744481477     PISSN: 09203206     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10557-005-1048-0     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Kubicek WG, Karnegis JN, Patterson RP, Witsoe DA, Mattson RH. Development and evaluation of an impedance cardiography output system. Aerospace Med 1966;37:1208-1212.
2. Kubicek WG, Kottke FJ, Ramos MU, et al. The Minnesota impedance cardiograph - theory and applications. Biomed Eng 1974;9:410-416.
3. Sramek BB. Electrical bioimpedance. Med Electron 1983;14:95-103.
4. Bernstein DP. Continuous noninvasive real-time monitoring of stroke volume and cardiac output by thoracic electrical bioimpedance. Crit Care Med 1986;14:898.
5. Acton G, Broom C. A comparison of attenuation compensated volume flow based Doppler echocardiography and impedance cardiography in healthy volunteers. Am J Noninvasiv Cardiol 1990;4:290-297.
6. Breithaupt K, Erb A, Neumann B, Wolf GZ, Belz GG. Comparison of four noninvasiv Techniques to measure stroke volume: Dual-beam Doppler echoaortography, electrical bioimpedance Cardiography, Mechanosphygmography and M-mode echocardiography of the left ventricle. Am J Noninvas Cardiol 1990;4:203-209.
7. Ng HW, Walley T, Tsao Y, Breckenridge AM. Comparison and reproducibility of transthoracic bioimpedance and dual beam Doppler ultrasound measurement of cardiac function in healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1991;32:275-282.
8. Robin ED. Death by pulmonary artery flow-directed catheter: Time for amoratorium? Chest 1987;92:727-31.
9. Fuller HD. The validity of cardiac output measurement by thoracic impedance: A meta-analysis. Clin Invest Med 1992;15:103-112.
10. Jensen L, Yakimets J, Teo KK. Issues in cardiovascular care. A review of impedance cardiography. Heart Lung 1995;24:83-93.
11. Woltjer HH, Bogaard HJ, de Vries PMJM. The technique of impedance cardiography. Eur Heart J 1997;18:1396-1403.
12. Clancy TV, Norman K, Reynolds R. Cardiac output measurement in critical care patients: Thoracic electrical bioimpedance versus thermodilution. J Trauma 1991;31:1116-1121.
13. van der Meer M, de Vries P. The reliability and applicability of impedance cardiography in the ICU. Intensivmed 1996:33:495-500.
14. Spahn DR, Schmid ER, Tornic EM, et al. Noninvasive versus invasive assessment of cardiac output after cardiac surgery: Clinical validation. J Cardiothorac Anesth 1990;4:46-59.
15. Perrino AC, Lippman A, Ariyan C, O'Connor TZ, Luther M. Intraoperative cardiac output monitoring: Comparison of impedance cardiography and thermodilution. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1994;8:24-29.
16. Goldstein DS, Cannon RO, Ziemlichman R, Keiser HR. Clinical evaluation of imdedacne cardiography. Clinical Physiology 1986;6:235-251.
17. Scherhag A, Pfleger S, de Mey C, Schreckenberger AB, Staedt U, Heene DL. Continuous measurement of hemodynamic alterations during pharmacologic cardiovascular stress using automated impedance cardiography. J Clin Pharmacol 1997;37:21-28.
18. Teo KK, Hetherington MD, Haennel RG, Greenwood PV, Rossall RE, Kappagoda T. Cardiac output measured by impedance cardiography during maximal exercise tests. Cardiovasc Res 1985;19:737-743.
19. Thomas SH. Impedance cardiography using the Sramek-Bernstein method: Accuracy and variability at rest and during exercise. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1992;34:467-476.
20. Belardinelli R, Ciampani N, Costantini C, Blandini A, Purcaro A. Comparison of impedance cardiography with thermodilution and direct Fick methods for noninvasive measurement of stroke volume and cardiac output during incremental exercise in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 1996;77:1293-1301.
21. Charloux A, Lonsdorfer-Wolf E, Richard R, et al. A new impedance cardiograph device for the non-invasive evaluation of cardiac output at rest and during exercise: Comparison with the "direct" Fick method. Eur J Appl Physiol 2000:82:313-320.
22. Tordi N, Mourot L, Matusheski B, Hughson RL. Measurements of cardiac output during constant exercises: comparison of two non-invasive techniques. Int J Sports Med 2004;25:145-149.
23. Richard R, Lonsdorfer-Wolf E, Charloux A, et al. Noninvasive cardiac output evaluation during a maximal progressive exercise test, using a new impedance cardiograph device. Eur J Appl Physiol 2001;85:202-207.
24. Christensen TB, Jensen BV, Hjerpe J, Kanstrup IL. Cardiac outpur measurement by electrical bioimpedance compared with the CO2 rebreathing technique at different levels of exercise. Clin Physiol 200:20:101-105.
25. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;(I):307-310.
26. Capan LM, Bernstein DP, Patel KP, Sanger J, Turndof H. Measurement of ejection fraction by bioimpedance method. Crit Care Med 1987;15:402.
27. Salandin V, Zussa C, Risica G, et al. Comparison of cardiac output estimation by thoracic electrical bioimpedance, thermodilution and Fick methods. Crit Care Med 1988;16:1157-1158.
28. Wong DH, Tremper KK, Stemmer EA, et al. Noninvasive cardiac output: Simultaneous comparison of two different methods with thermodilution. Anesthesiology 1990;72:784-92.
29. Pickett BR, Buell JC. Validity of Cardiac Output Measurement by Computer-Averaged Impedance Cardiography, and comparison with simultaneous thermodilution determinations. Am J Cardiol 1992;69:1354-1358.
30. Yung GL, Gedullo PF, Kinninger K, Johnson W, Channick RN. Comparison of impedance cardiography to direct fick and thermodilution cardiac output determination in pulmonary arterial hypertension. CHF 2004;10(2 suppl. 2):7-10.
31. De Mey C, Enterling D. Noninvasive assessment of cardiac performance by impedance cardiography: disagreement between two equations to estimate stroke volume. Aviat Space Environ Med 1988;59:57-62.