Magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder: Assessment of effectiveness

Brain and Language

Volumn 52, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 363-368

  Blanchard, T K ^a,b   Mackenzie, R ^a   Bearcroft, P W P ^a   Sinnatamby, R ^a   Gray, A ^a   Lomas, D J ^a   Constant, C R ^a   Dixon, A K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b ADDENBROOKE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT REFERRAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; SHOULDER; SHOULDER INJURY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 23744466830     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(97)80131-6     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Cartland JP, Crues JV, Stauffer S et al. MR imaging in the evaluation of SLAP injuries of the shoulder: findings in 10 patients. American Journal of Roentgenology 1992;159:787-792.
2. Chandnani VP, Gagliardi JA, Murnane TG et al. Glenohumeral ligaments and shoulder capsular mechanism: evaluation with MR arthrography. Radiology 1993;196:27-32.
3. Epstein RE, Schweiter ME, Frieman BG et al. Hooked acromion: prevalence on MR images of painful shoulders. Radiology 1993;187:479-481.
4. Quinn SF, Sheley RC, Demlow TA et al. Rotator cuff tendon tears: evaluation with fat suppressed MR imaging with arthroscopic correlation in 100 patients. Radiology 1995;195:497-500.
5. Robertson PL, Schweiter MD, Mitchell DG et al. Rotator cuff disorders: Intraobserver and intraobserver variation in diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology 1995;195:831-835.
6. Vahlensieck M, Resendes M, Lang P et al. Shoulder MRI: the subacromial/subdeltoid bursa fat stripe in healthy and pathological conditions. European Journal of Radiology 1992;14:223-227.
7. Kaplan PA, Bryans KC, Davick JP et al. MR imaging of the normal shoulder: variants and pitfalls. Radiology 1992;184:519-524.
8. Neumann CH, Holt RG, Steinbach LS et al. MR imaging of the shoulder: appearance of the supraspinatus tendon in asymptomatic volunteers. American Journal of Roentgenology 1992;158:1281-1287.
9. Liou JTS, Wilson AJ, Totty WG et al. Normal shoulder: common variations that simulate pathological conditions at MR imaging. Radiology 1993;186:435-441.
10. Massengill AD, Seegal LL, Yao L et al. Labrocapsular ligamentous complex of the shoulder: normal anatomy, anatomical variation, and pitfalls of MR imaging and MR arthrography. RadioGraphics 1994;14:1211-1223.
11. Friedman DP, Rosetti GF, Flanders AE et al. MR imaging: Quality assessment method and ratings at 33 centers. Radiology 1995;196:219-226.
12. Goodwin DW, Pathria MN. Magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder. Orthopedics 1994;17:1021-1028.
13. Peterfy CG, Linares R, Steinbach LS. Recent advances in magnetic resonance imaging of the musculoskeletal system. Radiologic Clinics of North America 1994;32:291-311.
14. Patten RM, Spear RP, Richardson ML. Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears using supplemental images in the oblique sagittal plane. Investigative Radiology 1994;29:87-93.
15. Department of Health. Research for health: a research and development strategy for the NHS. London: Department of Health, 1991.
16. Health Technology Assessment Advisory Group. Assessing the effect of health technologies. London: Department of Health, 1992.
17. Office of Technology Assessment. Policy implications of the computed tomography (CT) scanner. Washington DC: Government Printing Office, 1978.
18. Balaban DJ, Goldfarb NI. Medical evaluation of health care technologies. In: Cuyler AJ, Horisberger B, eds. Economic and medical evaluation of health care technologies. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1983:16-31.
19. White KL. Evaluation in Medicine. In: Cuyler AJ, Horisberger B, eds. Economic and medical evaluation of health care technologies. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1983:3-15.
20. Russell I. The Evaluation of Computerized Tomography: A review of research methods. In: Cuyler AJ, Horisberger B, eds. Economic and medical evaluation of health care technologies. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1983:298-316.
21. Kelsey Fry I. Who needs high technology? British Journal of Radiology 1984;57:765-772.
22. Fineberg HV, Baumen R, Sosman M. Computerized cranial tomography: Effect on diagnostic and therapeutic plans. Journal of the American Medical Association 1977;238:224-227.
23. Institute of Medicine. Policy Statement: computed tomographic scanning Washington DC: National Academic of Sciences, 1977.
24. Sanford Schwartz J. Evaluating diagnostic technologies. In: Institute of Medicine, Assessing medical technologies. Washington: National Academic Press, 1985 80-89.
25. Maisey MN, Hutton J. Guidelines For The Evaluation Of Radiological Technologies London: British Institute of Radiology, 1991.
26. Kent DL, Larson EB. Disease, level of impact and quality of research methods: three dimensions of clinical efficacy assessment applied to magnetic resonance imaging. Investigative Radiology 1992;27:245-254.
27. Thornbury JR. Clinical efficacy of diagnostic imaging: love it or leave it. American Journal of Roentgenology 1994;162:1-8.
28. Mackenzie R, Dixon AK. Measuring the effects of imaging: An evaluative framework. Clinical Radiology 1995;50:513-518.
29. Mackenzie R, Hollingworth W, Dixon AK. Quality of life assessments in the evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging. Quality of Life Research 1994;3:29-37.
30. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.
31. Ware JE. SF-36 health survey Manual and interpretation guide. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Centre, 1993.
32. Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NMB et al. The SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. British Medical Journal 1992;305:160-164.
33. Garrett AM, Ruta DA, Abdalla MI et al. The SF-36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS? British Medical Journal 1993;306:1440-1444.
34. Siegel S, Castellan NJ. Non-parametric statistics for the behavioural sciences, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw Hill, 1988.
35. Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Wright L. Short form 36 (SF 36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age. British Medical Journal 1993;306:1437-1440.
36. Jenkinson C, Wright L, Coulter A. Quality of life measurements in health care: A review of measures and population norms for the UK SF-36. Oxford: Health Services Research Unit, 1993.
37. Mackenzie R, Dixon AK, Keene GS et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: assessment of effectiveness. Clinical Radiology 1996;51:245-250.
38. Hollingworth W, Mackenzie R, Todd C et al. Measuring changes in health following magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: Rosser Index, EuroQol or SF-36? Quality of Life Research 1995;4:325-334.
39. Streiner DW, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.
40. Franken EA, Berbaum KS, Dunn V et al. Impact of MR imaging on clinical diagnosis and management: a prospective study. Radiology 1986;161:377-380.
41. Dixon AK, Southern JP, Teale A et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for the head and spine: Effective for the clinician or the patient? British Medical Journal 1991;302:78-82.
42. Szczpura A, Fletcher J, Fitz-Patrick D. An evaluation of the introduction of MRI in a UK service setting. Health Services Research Unit, University of Warwick, 1991.
43. Mackenzie R, Lomas DJ, Villar RN et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for the problem knee: a randomised clinical trial. British Journal of Radiology 1993;66(suppl.):21.
44. Birch N, Powles D, Dorell H et al. The investigation and treatment of disorders of the knee: indications and a cost-comparison of arthroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging. Health Trends 1994;26:50-52.