The role of nurses in installing telehealth technology in the home

CIN - Computers Informatics Nursing

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 181-189

  Starren, Justin ^a   Tsai, Christopher ^b   Bakken, Suzanne ^a   Aidala, Angela ^a   Morin, Philip C ^c   Hilliman, Charlyn ^a   Weinstock, Ruth S ^c,d   Goland, Robin ^a,e   Teresi, Jeanne ^a,f,g   Shea, Steven ^h  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b YALE NEW HAVEN HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c SUNY UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e NewYork Presbyterian Hospital   (United States)

^f Hebrew Home for the Aged   (United States)

^g NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^h Columbia University ^*

Author keywords

Medical informatics; Nursing; Technology; Telemedicine

Indexed keywords

EID: 23744454325     PISSN: 15382931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00024665-200507000-00004     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Field MJ, Grisgsby J. Telemedicine and remote patient monitoring. JAMA. 2002;288(4):423-425.
2. Institute of Medicine (US), Committee on Evaluating Clinical Applications of Telemedicine. Telemedicine. A Guide to Assessing Telecommunication in Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1996.
3. Celler BG, Lovell NH, Chan DK. The potential impact of home telecare on clinical practice. Med J Aust. 1999;171(10):518-521.
4. Mackinnon M. Information technology in medicine: changing the way we practice. Med J Aust. 1997;167(11/12):574.
5. Coiera E. The impact of culture on technology. Med J Aust. 1999; 171(10):508-509.
6. Pelletier-Fleury N, Fargeon V, Lanoe JL, Fardeau M. Transaction costs economics as a conceptual framework for the analysis of barriers to the diffusion of telemedicine. Health Policy. 1997; 42(1):1-14.
7. Kinsella A. Home telehealthcare, disease management and diabetes. Remington Rep. May/June 1999:16-26.
8. Shea S, Sengupta S, Crosswell A, Clayton PD. Network information security in a phase III integrated academic information management system (IAIMS). Proc Symp Comp Appl Med Care. 1992:283-286.
9. Starren J, Xie G. Comparison of three knowledge representation formalisms for encoding the NCEP cholesterol guidelines. Proc AMIA Fall Symp. 1994:792-796.
10. Shea S, Starren J, Weinstock RS, et al. Columbia University's Informatics for Diabetes Education and Telemedicine (IDEATeI) project: rationale and design. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002;9(1):46-92.
11. Hripcsak G, Ludemann P, Pryor TA, Wigertz OB, Clayton PD. Rationale for the Arden syntax. Comp Biomed Res. 1994;27(4):291-324.
12. Starren J, Hripcsak G, Sengupta S, et al. Columbia University's Informatics for Diabetes Education and Telemedicine (IDEATel) project: technical implementation. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002;9:25-36.
13. Nuendorf K. The Content Analysis Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2002.
14. Weinberg D, ed. Qualitative Research Methods. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers; 2002.
15. Strauss A, Corbin J. Open Coding. Basics of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1998.
16. American Nurses Association. Core Principles on Telehealth. Report of the Interdisciplinary Telehealth Standards Working Group. Washington, DC: American Nurses Publishing; 1999.
17. Blevins C. There really is a difference: home care competencies. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2001;32(3):114-117.
18. Saba VK. Nursing classifications: Home Health Care Classification System (HHCC): an overview. Online J Issues Nurs. 2002;7(3). Available at: nursingworld.org/ojin/tpc7/tpc7_7.htm. Accessed October 21, 2004.
19. Staggers N, Gassert CA, Curran C. Informatics competencies for nurses at four levels of practice. J Nurs Educ. 2001;40(7):303-315.
20. American Nurses Association. Scope and Standards of Nursing Informatics Practice. Washington, DC: American Nurses Publishing; 2001.
21. Sotiriou D. Education and training in healthcare telematics. In: lakovidis I, Maglavera S, Trakatellis A, eds. User Acceptance of Health Telematics Applications: Education and Training in Health Telematics. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2000:133-138.
22. Skouras CA. Health informatics in the context of user ownership. In: Iakovidis I, Maglavera S, Trakatellis A, eds. User Acceptance of Health Telematics Applications: Education and Training in Health Telematics. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2000:139-144.
23. Adams DL. Home healthcare: a new venue for telemedicine. In: Kellock B, ed. World Medical Technology Update. London: Kensington Publication Ltd; 1997:226-228.
24. Dansky KH, Milliron M, Gamm L. Understanding hospital referrals to home health agencies. Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1996;41(3):331-342.
25. Bowles KH, Dansky KH. Teaching self-management of diabetes via telehomecare. Home Healthcare Nurse. 2002;20(1):36-42.
26. Dansky K, Bowles K, Palmer L. Clinical outcomes of telehomecare for diabetic patients. J Inform Technol Healthc. 2003;1(1):61-74.
27. Wootton R. Recent advances: telemedicine. BMJ. 2001;323(7312): 557-560.
28. Stephanidis C. Designing for interaction quality in health telematics. In: Iakovidis I, Maglavera S, Trakatellis A, eds. User Acceptance of Health Telematics Applications: Education and Training in Health Telematics. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2000:95-107.
29. Fox S, Rainie L, Larsen E, et al. Wired Seniors: A Fervent Few, Inspired by Family Ties. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2001.
30. Warschauer D. Demystifying the digital divide. Sci Am. August 2003; 42-47.
31. Dansky KH, Palmer L, Shea D, Bowles KH. Cost analysis of telehomecare. Telemed J E Health. 2001;7(3):225-232.
32. Tang PC, Jaworski MA, Fellencer CA, Kreider N, LaRosa MP, Marquardt WC. Clinician information activities in diverse ambulatory care practices. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp. 1996:12-16.