Adolescent identity formation: A Swedish study of identity status using the EOM-EIS-II

Adolescence

Volumn 40, Issue 158, 2005, Pages 377-396

  Bergh, Susanne ^a   Erling, Ann ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD PSYCHOLOGY; FEMALE; GENDER IDENTITY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SCHOOL; SELF CONCEPT; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; STANDARD; STUDENT; SWEDEN; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT PSYCHOLOGY; FEMALE; GENDER IDENTITY; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; SCHOOLS; SELF CONCEPT; SEX FACTORS; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION; STUDENTS; SWEDEN;

EID: 23744449324     PISSN: 00018449     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Adams, G. R., Bennion, L., & Huh, K. (1989). Objective measure of ego identity status: A reference manual. Unpublished manuscript, University of Guelph, Canada.
2. Adamson, L. (2003). Personal communication.
3. Allison, B. N., & Schultz, J. B. (2001). Interpersonal identity formation during early adolescence. Adolescence, 36(143), 509-523.
4. Archer, S. L., & Waterman, A. S. (1993). Identity status interview: Early and middle adolescent form. In D. R. Matteson, J. L. Orlofsky, A. S. Waterman, S. L. Archer, & J. E. Marcia (Eds.), Ego identity: A handbook of psychosocial research (pp. 285-302). New York: Springer-Verlag.
5. Danielsen, L. M., Lorem, A. E., & Kroger, J. (2000). The impact of social context on the identity-formation process of Norwegian late adolescents. Youth and Society, 31(3), 332-362.
6. Erikson, E. H. (1959). Identity and the life cycle. New York: Norton.
7. Erikson, E. H. (1969). Ungdomens identitetskriser [Identity, youth and crisis] (P. Wiking, Trans.). Stockholm: Natur och kultur.
8. Jensen, M., Rristiansen, I., Sandbekk, M., & Kroger, J. (1998). Ego identity status in cross-cultural context: A comparison of Norwegian and United States university students. Psychological Reports, 83(2), 455-460.
9. Jones, R. M., Akers, J. F., & White, J. M. (1994). Revised classification criteria for the Extended Objective Measure of Ego Identity Status (EOMEIS). Journal of Adolescence, 17(6), 533-549.
10. Kroger, J. (1996). Identity in adolescence: The balance between self and other. London: Routledge.
11. Kroger, J. (2000). Ego identity status research in the new millennium. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 24(2), 145-148.
12. Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego-identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3(5), 551-558.
13. Marcia, J. E. (1993a). The ego identity status approach to ego identity. In D. R. Matteson, J. L. Orlofsky, A. S. Waterman, S. L. Archer, & J. E. Marcia (Eds.), Ego identity: A handbook of psychosocial research (pp. 3-21). New York: Springer-Verlag.
14. Marcia, J. E. (1993b). The relational roots of identity. In J. Kroger (Ed.), Discussions on ego identity (pp. 101-120). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Marcia, J. E. (1993c). The status of the statuses: Research review. In D. R. Matteson, J. L. Orlofsky, A. S. Waterman, S. L. Archer, & J. E. Marcia (Eds.), Ego identity: A handbook of psychosocial research (pp. 22-41). New York: Springer-Verlag.
16. Marcia, J. E. (1994). The empirical study of ego identity. In H. A. Bosma, T. L.Graafsma, H. D. Grotevant, & D. J. Delevita (Eds.), Identity and development: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 67-80). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
17. Marcia, J. E. (2003). Personal communication.
18. Matteson, D. R. (1993a). Differences within and between genders: A challenge to the theory. In D. R. Matteson, J. L. Orlofsky, A. S. Waterman, S. L. Archer, & J. E. Marcia (Eds.), Ego identity: A handbook of psychosocial research (pp. 69-110). New York: Springer-Verlag.
19. Matteson, D. R. (1993b). Interviewers and interviewing. In D. R. Matteson, J. L. Orlofsky, A. S. Waterman, S. L. Archer, & J. E. Marcia (Eds.), Ego identity: A handbook of psychosocial research (pp. 137-155). New York: Springer-Verlag.
20. Stegarud, L., Solheim, B., Karlsen, M., & Kroger, J. (1999). Ego identity status in cross-cultural context: A replication study. Psychological Reports, 85(2), 457-461.
21. Waterman, A. S. (1999). Issues of identity formation revisited: United States and The Netherlands 1. Developmental Review, 19(4), 462-479.
22. Waterman, A. S. (1993a). Developmental perspectives on identity formation: From adolescence to adulthood. In D. R. Matteson, J. L. Orlofsky, A. S. Waterman, S. L. Archer, & J. E. Marcia (Eds.), Ego identity: A handbook of psychosocial research (pp. 42-68). New York: Springer-Verlag.
23. Waterman, A. S. (1993b). Overview of the identity status scoring criteria. In D. R. Matteson, J. L. Orlofsky, A. S. Waterman, S. L. Archer, & J. E. Marcia (Eds.), Ego identity: A handbook of psychosocial research (pp. 156-176). New York: Springer-Verlag.