Spatial variation of phytoplankton and some abiotic variables in the Pirapó River-PR (Brazil) in August 1999: A preliminary study

Acta Scientiarum - Biological Sciences

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 1-8

  Federiche Borges, Paula Aparecida ^a   Rodrigues, Luzia Cleide ^a   Pagioro, Thomaz Aurélio ^a   Train, Sueli ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF MARINGÁ   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Abiotic variables; Eutrophication; Phytoplankton; Pirap river

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMASS; BRAZIL; DIATOM; EUTROPHICATION; MARINE ENVIRONMENT; NONHUMAN; PHYTOPLANKTON; RIVER; SPECIES DIVERSITY; SPECIES RICHNESS; SURFACE PROPERTY;

BACILLARIOPHYTA; CYANOBACTERIA; NAVICULA CRYPTOCEPHALA; PALEA; PSEUDANABAENA GALEATA;

EID: 23744432957     PISSN: 16799283     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. AMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION. Standard methods for the examination of water and waste-water. Washington: Am. Public Heath Assoc., 1985.
2. BRANCO, C.W.C.; SENNA, P.A.C. Factors influencing the development of Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii and Microcystis aeruginosa in the Paranoá Reservoir, Brasilia, Brazil. Alg. Studies, v.75, p.85-96, 1994.
3. CASSARO, L. Estudo da degradação ambiental da bacia de captação de água de abastecimento da cidade de Maringá - rio Pirapó, 1999. Monografia (Especializaçã o). Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, 1999.
4. DEFFUNE, G. et al. Classificação Climática e Índices de Aridez para Maringá - PR, de 1976/1992. Boletim de Geografia. Universidade Estadual de Maringá. Departamento de Geografia. Year 12. Special Edition. June, 1994.
5. EDLER, L. Recommendations for marine biological studies in the Baltic Sea; phytoplankton and chlorophyll, 1979. UNESCO, Working Group 11, Baltic Marine Biologists. 1979.
6. GOLTERMAN, H.L. et al. Methods for physical and chemical analysis of freshwater.2 ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publication, 1978.
7. HARPER, D. Eutrophication of freshwaters: Principles, problems and restoration. London: Chapmam & Hall, 1992.
8. HUSZAR, V.L.M. et al. Phytoplankton species composition is more sensitive than OECD criteria to the trophic status of three Brazilian tropical lakes. Hydrobiologia., Dordrecht, v.369/370, p.59-71, 1998.
9. HUSZAR, V.L.M.; SILVA, L.H.S. da. A estrutura da comunidade fitoplanctônica no Brasil: cinco décadas de estudos. LIMNOtemas, Rio de Janeiro, n.2, jul. 1999. Disponível em: 〈http://www.sbl. biologia.ufrj.br/〉. Accessed on: 16 October 2000.
10. HUSZAR, V.L.M.; REYNOLDS, C.S. Phytoplankton periodicity and sequences of dominance in an Amazonian flood-plain lake (Lago Batata, Pará, Brazil): responses to gradual environmental change. Hydrobiologia, Dordrecht, v. 346, p. 169-181, 1997.
11. HYNES, H.B.N. The ecology of running waters. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1976.
12. JACKSON, D.A. Stopping rules in principal components analysis: a comparison of heuristical and statistical approaches. Ecology, New York, v. 74, n. 8, p. 2204-2214, 1993.
13. LANG-BERTALOT, H. Pollution tolerance of diatoms as a criteria for water quality estimation. Nova Hedwigia. São Paulo, v.64, p. 285-304, 1979.
14. LEANDRINI, J.A. Estudo taxonômico de Navicula Bory da região de captação de água da SANEPAR, rio Pirapó, Maringá, Paraná. 1996. Monografia (Bacharelado) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, 1996.
15. LEANDRINI, J.A. Diatomáceas perifíticas da região de captação de água da SANEPAR, Maringá-Paraná (córrego Sarandi e rio Pirapó). 1999. Dissertação (Mestrado em Botânica) - Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, 1999.
16. LEANDRINI, J.A. et al. Espécies perifíticas de Navicula Bory de dois sistemas lóticos do município de Maringá, Estado do Paraná - Brasil. Hoehnea, São Paulo, v. 29, n. 1, p. 49-56, 2002.
17. LOBO, E.; LEIGHTON, G. Estructuras de las fitocenosis planctónicas de los sistemas de desembocaduras de rios y esteros de la zona central de Chile. Rev. Biol. Mar., v.22, n.1, p.1-29, 1986.
18. LUND, J.W.G. et al. The inverted microscope method of estimating algal number and the statistical basis of estimating by couting. Hydrobyologea, Dordrecht, v. 11, p. 143-170, 1958.
19. MACKERETH, F.Y.H. et al. Water analysis: some revised methods for limnologists. Cumbria: Fresh. Biological Assoc., (Scientific publication 36), 1978.
20. MCCUNE, B.; MEFFORD, M.J. PC-Ord. Multivariate analysis of ecological data, version 3.0. MjM Software Design, USA: Oregon, 1995.
21. MELO, S.; HUSZAR, V.L.M. Phytoplankton in an Amazonian flood-plain lake (Lago Batata, Brazil): deil variation and species strategies. J. Plankton Res., v. 22, p.63-76, 2000.
22. MORO, R.S.; FÜRSTENBERGER, C.B. Catálogo dos principais parâmetros ecológicos de diatomáceas não-marinhas. Ponta Grossa: UEPG Press, 1997.
23. NÜRNBERG, G.K. Trophic state of clear and colored, soft and hardwater lakes with special consideration of nutrients, anoxia, phytoplankton and fish. Lake Rese. Manag., Medison, v.4, n. 12, p. 432-447, 1996.
24. REYNOLDS, C.S. Functional morphology and the adaptative strategies of freshwater phytoplankton. In SANDGREN, C. Growth and reproductive strategies of freshwater phytoplankton. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988. chap. 10, p.388-433.
25. REYNOLDS, C.S. The role of fluid motion in the dinamics of phytoplankton in lakes and rivers. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publication, 1994.
26. REYNOLDS, C.S. Vegetation process in the pelagic: A model for ecosystem theory. Oldendorf: Ecology Institute, 1997.
27. ROJO, C. Differential attributes of phytoplankton across the trophic gradient: a conceptual landscape with gaps. Hydrobiologia, Dordrecht, v. 369/370, p. 1-9, 1998.
28. SIVONEN, K.; JONES, G. Cyanobacterial toxin. In: CHORUS, I.; BARTRAM, J. Toxic Cyanobacteria in water: A guide to their public health consequences, monitoring and management. London and New York: E & FN Spon, 1999. chap. 3, p. 41-111.
29. SLADÉCEK, V. system of water quality from the biological point of view. Arch. Hydrobiol. Beih. Ergebn Limnol., Stuttgart, v. 7, n.1, p.1-128, 1973.
30. SHOEMAN, F.R. A systematical and ecological study of the diatom flora of Lesotho with special reference to the water quality. Pretoria: V & R Printers, 1973.
31. SHANNON, C.E.; WEAVER, W. A mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, Illinois: University Press, 1963.
32. SOMMER, U. Growth and survival strategies of planktonic diatoms. In: SANDGREN, C. Growth and reproductive strategies of freshwater phytoplankton. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988. chap. 6, p.227-260.
33. TRAIN, S. Diatomoflórula do Córrego Moscados, Maringá-PR. 1990. Dissertação (Mestrado) - Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, 1990.
34. TRAIN, S.; RODRIGUES, L.C. Distribuição espaço- temporal da comunidade fitoplanctônica. In: VAZZOLER; A.E.A.M. et al. A planície de inundação do alto rio Paraná: aspectos físicos, biológicos e socioeconômicos. Maringá: EDUEM, 1997. chap.II-1, p.105-116.
35. TRAIN, S.; RODRIGUES, L.C. Temporal fluctuations of the phytoplankton community of the Baía River, in the upper Paraná River floodplain, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Hydrobiologia, Dordrecht, v.361, p.125-134, 1998.
36. TRAIN, S. et al. Dinâmica Sazonal da Comunidade Fitoplanctônica de um Canal Lateral (Canal Cortado) do Alto Rio Paraná (PR, Brasil). Acta Scientiarum, Maringá, v.22, p.389-395, 2000.
37. TILMAN, D. et al. Green, bluegreen and diatom algae: Taxonomic differences in competitive ability from phosphorus, silicon and nitrogen. Archi. Hydrobiol., Stuttgart, v. 106, p.473-485, 1986.
38. TUNDISI, J.G. Key factors of reservoir functioning and geographical aspects of reservoir limnology Chairman's overview. Arch. Hydrobiol. Beih. Ergebn. Limnol., Stuttgart, v. 33, p.645-646, 1990.
39. UTERMOHL, H. Zur Vervollkommnung der quantitativen phytoplankton- methodic. Mitt. Int. Ver. Limnol., Hichory Corners, n.9, p.1-39, 1958.
40. WETZEL, R.G.; LINKENS, G.E. Limnological analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1991.
41. WHITE, L. C. Relatório Final da Comissão de estudos das Minas de Carvão de Pedra do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Imprensa Nacional, 1908,.