Magnetic field interactions of orthodontic wires during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 1.5 Tesla;Magnetische Kräfte auf kieferorthopädische Drähte während Magnetresonanztomographie bei 1,5 Tesla

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 66, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 279-287

  Klocke, Arndt ^a   Kemper, Jörn ^a   Schulze, Dirk ^a,b   Adam, Gerhard ^a   Kahl Nieke, Bärbel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Magnetic resonance imaging; Orthodontic wires; Rotational force; Safety; Translational force

Indexed keywords

ALLOY; CHROMIUM; COBALT; METAL ION; MOLYBDENUM; NICKEL; TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; DENTURE; GRAVITY; HEALTH HAZARD; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETISM; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY; TORQUE;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, RADIATION; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; EQUIPMENT SAFETY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ORTHODONTIC WIRES; RADIOMETRY; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 23644461338     PISSN: 14345293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00056-005-0505-5     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). Designation: F2052-02. Standard test method for measurement of magnetically induced displacement force on medical devices in the magnetic resonance environment. In: Annual book of ASTM standards. Section 10. Medical devices and services. Volume 13.01: Medical devices: Emergency medical services. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM, 2002:1576-80.
2. Baker KB, Nyenhuis JA, Hrdlicka G, et al. Neurostimulation systems: assessment of magnetic field interactions associated with 1.5- and 3-Tesla MR systems. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;21:72-7.
3. Brandley WA. Orthodontic wires. In Brandley WA, Eliades T (eds.): Orthodontic materials: Scientific and clinical aspects. Stuttgart-New York: Thieme, 2001;77-103.
4. Carr JJ. Danger in performing MR imaging on women who have tattooed eyeliner or similar types of permanent injections. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;165:1546-7.
5. Chaljub G, Kramer LA, Johnson III RF, et al. Projectile cylinder accidents resulting from the presence of ferromagnetic nitrous oxide or oxygen tanks in the MR suite. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:27-30.
6. Chen DW. Boy, 6, dies of skull injury during MRI: Oxygen tank becomes fatal missile in hospital. New York Times; 31. Juli 2001, p. B1, 5.
7. Colletti PM. Size "H" oxygen cylinder: Accidental MR projectile at 1.5 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;19:141-3.
8. Edwards MB, Taylor KM, Shellock FG. Prosthetic heart valves: Evaluation of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 1.5 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:363-9.
9. Greatbatch W, Miller V, Shellock FG. Magnetic resonance safety testing of a newly-developed fiber-optic cardiac pacing lead. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:97-103.
10. Jackson JG, Acker H. Permanent eyeliner and MR imaging (letter). AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987;149:1080.
11. Kagetsu NJ, Litt AW. Important considerations in measurement of attractive force on metallic implants in MR imagers. Radiology 1991;179:505-8.
12. Kanal E, Shellock FG. Aneurysm clips: Effects of long-term and multiple exposures to a 1.5-T MR system. Radiology 1999;210:563-5.
13. Kangarlu A, Shellock FG. Aneurysm clips: Evaluation of magnetic field interactions with an 8.0 T MR system. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:107-11.
14. Kelly WM, Paglen PG, Pearson JA, et al. Ferromagnetism of intraocular foreign body causes unilateral blindness after MR study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1986;7:243-5.
15. Klocke A, Kemper J, Schulze D, et al. Orthodontic brackets and attachments: Evaluation of rotational and translational forces at 1.5 T (submitted).
16. Klucznik RP, Carrier DA, Pyka R, et al. Placement of a ferromagnetic intracerebral aneurysm clip in a magnetic field with a fatal outcome. Radiology 1993;187:855-6.
17. Kreidstein ML, Giguere D, Freiberg A. MRI interaction with tattoo pigments: Case report, pathophysiology, and management. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;99:1717-20.
18. Lund G, Wirtschafter JD, Nelson JD, et al. Tattooing of eyelids: magnetic resonance imaging artifacts. Ophthalmic Surg 1986;17:550-3.
19. New PFJ, Rosen BR, Brady TJ, et al. Potential hazards and artifacts of ferromagnetic and nonferromagnetic surgical and dental materials and devices in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Radiology 1982;147:139-48.
20. Nogueira M, Shellock FG. Otologic bioimplants: Ex vivo assessment of ferromagnetism and artifacts at 1.5T. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;163:1472-3.
21. Okano Y, Yamashiro M, Kaneda T, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of the temporomandibular joint in patients with orthodontic appliances. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;95:255-63.
22. Park SM, Nyenhuis JA, Smith CD, et al. Gelled versus nongelled phantom material for measurement of MRI-induced temperature increases with bioimplants. IEEE Trans Magn 2003;39:3367-71.
23. Sadowsky PL, Bernreuter W, Lakshminarayanan AV, et al. Orthodontic appliances and magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and temporomandibular joint. Angle Orthod 1988;58:9-20.
24. Sawyer-Glover AM, Shellock FG. Pre-MRI procedure screening: recommendations and safety considerations for biomedical implants and devices. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:92-106.
25. Schenck JF. The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med Phys 1996;23:815-50.
26. Shellock FG. Magnetic resonance procedures: Safety and health effects. Boca Raton, FL CRC Press, 2001:327-92.
27. Shellock FG. Metallic neurosurgical implants: Evaluation of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 1.5-Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;14:295-9.
28. Shellock FG. Magnetic resonance safety update 2002: Implants and devices. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:485-96.
29. Shellock FG, Crues JV. High-field-strength MR imaging and metallic biomedical implants: An ex vivo evaluation of deflection forces. AJR 1988;151:389-92.
30. Shellock FG, Crues JV. MR procedures: Biologic effects, safety, and patient care. Radiology 2004;232:635-52.
31. Shellock FG, Shellock VJ. Metallic stents: Evaluation of MR imaging safety. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;173:543-7.
32. Shellock FG, Tkach JA, Ruggieri PM, et al. Cardiac pacemakers, ICDs and loop recorder: Evaluation of translational attraction using conventional ("Long-Bore") and "Short-Bore" 1.5- and 3.0-Tesla MR systems. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2003;5:387-97.
33. Tope WD, Shellock FG. Magnetic resonance imaging and permanent cosmetics (tattoos): Survey of complications and adverse effects. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;15:180-4.
34. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) Medical Device Reports (MDR) data files. Zugang am 4. Februar 2005. Rockville, MD, USA, 2005: www.fda.gov/cdrh/.
35. Vahlensieck M. Tattoo-related cutaneous inflammation (burn grade I) in a mid-field MR scanner (letter). Eur J Radiol 2000;10:197.
36. Wagle WA, Smith M. Tattoo-induced skin burn during MR imaging (letter). AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:1795.