Drought tolerance is associated with rooting depth and stomatal control of water use in clones of Coffea canephora

Annals of Botany

Volumn 96, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 101-108

  Pinheiro, Hugo A ^a   DaMatta, Fábio M ^a   Chaves, Agnaldo R M ^a   Loureiro, Marcelo E ^a   Ducatti, Carlos ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF VIÇOSA   (Brazil)

^b SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Carbon isotope ratio; Elastic and osmotic adjustments; Robusta coffee; Vapour pressure deficit; Water potential; Water relations; Water use efficiency

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; DROUGHT RESISTANCE; OSMOREGULATION; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; WATER RELATIONS; WATER USE EFFICIENCY;

COFFEA CANEPHORA;

WATER;

ARTICLE; COFFEE; HISTOLOGY; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT LEAF; PLANT ROOT; TIME;

COFFEA; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT ROOTS; TIME FACTORS; WATER;

EID: 23644458579     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mci154     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Blake TJ, Bevilacqua E, Zwiazek JJ. 1991. Effects of repeated stress on turgor pressure and cell elasticity changes in bleak spruce seedlings. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 21: 1329-1333.
2. DaMatta FM. 2003. Drought as a multidimensional stress affecting photosynthesis in tropical tree crops. In: Hemantaranjan A, ed. Advances in plant physiology. Vol. 5. Jodhpur: Scientific Publishers, 227-265.
3. DaMatta FM. 2004a. Ecophysiological constraints on the production of shaded and unshaded coffee: a review. Field Crops Research 86: 99-114.
4. DaMatta FM. 2004b. Exploring drought tolerance in coffee: a physiological approach with some insights for plant breeding. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology 16: 1-6.
5. DaMatta FM, Rena AB. 2001. Tolerância do café à seca. In: Zambolim L, ed. Tecnologias de produção de café com qualidade. Viçosa: Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 65-100.
6. DaMatta FM, Maestri M, Barros RS, Regazzi AJ. 1993. Water relations of coffee leaves (Coffea arabica and C. canephora) in response to drought. Journal of Horticultural Science 68: 741-746.
7. DaMatta FM, Maestri M, Mosquim PR, Barros RS. 1997. Photosynthesis in coffee (Coffea arabica and C. canephora) as affected by winter and summer conditions. Plant Science 128: 43-50.
8. DaMatta FM, Silveira JSM, Ducatti C, Loureiro ME. 2000. Eficiência do uso da água e tolerância à seca em Coffea canephora. In: I Simpósio de Pesquisa dos Cafés do Brasil. Vol. 2. Brasília: EMBRAPA, 907-910.
9. DaMatta FM, Loos RA, Silva EA, Loureiro ME, Ducatti C. 2002. Effects of soil water deficit and nitrogen nutrition on water relations and photosynthesis of pot-grown Coffea canephora Pierre. Trees 16: 555-558.
10. DaMatta FM, Chaves ARM, Pinheiro HA, Ducatti C, Loureiro ME. 2003. Drought tolerance of two field-grown clones of Coffea canephora. Plant Science 164: 111-117.
11. Donovan LA, West JB, McLeod KW. 2000. Quercus species differ in water and nutrient characteristics in a resource-limited fall-line sandhill habitat. Tree Physiology 20: 929-936.
12. Fan S, Blake TJ, Blumwald E. 1994. The relative contribution of elastic and osmotic adjustment to turgor maintenance of woody plants. Physiologia Plantarum 90: 414-419.
13. Farquhar GD, Ehleringer JR, Hubick KT. 1989. Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 40: 503-537.
14. Ferrão RG, Fonseca AFA, Ferrão MAG, Santos LP. 2000a. Avaliação de clones elites de café Conilon em condição de estresse hídrico no estado do Espirito Santo. In: I Simpósio de Pesquisa dos Cafés do Brasil. Vol. 1. Brasília: EMBRAPA, 402-404.
15. Ferrão RG, Fonseca AFA, Ferrão MAG, Santos LP. 2000b. Comportamento de clones elites de café Conilon em condições de alta tecnologia no estado do Espírito Santo. In: I Simpósio de Pesquisa dos Cafés do Brasil. Vol. 2. Brasília: EMBRAPA, 769-771.
16. Fuchs EE, Livingston NJ. 1996. Hydraulic control of stomatal conductance in Douglas fir [Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco] and alder [Alnus rubra (Bong)] seedlings. Plant, Cell and Environment 19: 1091-1098.
17. Gucci R, Massai R, Xiloyannis C, Flore JA. 1996. The effect of drought and vapour pressure deficit on gas exchange of young kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa var. deliciosa) vines. Annals of Botany 77: 605-613.
18. Gutiérrez MV, Meinzer FC, Grantz DA. 1994. Regulation of transpiration in coffee hedgerows: Covariation of environmental variables and apparent responses of stomata to wind and humidity. Plant, Cell and Environment 17: 1305-1313.
19. Hinckley TM, Duhme F, Hinckley AR, Richter H. 1980. Water relations of drought hardy shrubs: osmotic potential and stomatal reactivity. Plant, Cell and Environment 3: 131-140.
20. Hubbard RM, Bond BJ, Ryan MG. 1999. Evidence that hydraulic conductance limits photosynthesis in old Pinus ponderosa trees. Tree Physiology 19: 165-172.
21. Jones HG. 1998. Stomatal control of photosynthesis and transpiration. Journal of Experimental Botany 49: 387-398.
22. th International Scientific Colloquium on Coffee. Paris: Association Scientifique Internationale du Café, 520-527.
23. Kozlowski TT, Pallardy SG. 1997. Physiology of woody plants. San Diego: Academic Press.
24. Kramer PJ, Boyer JS. 1995. Water relations of plants and soils. San Diego: Academic Press.
25. Landsberg JJ. 1986. Physiological ecology of forest production. San Diego: Academic Press.
26. Lima ALS, DaMatta FM, Pinheiro HA, Totola MR, Loureiro ME. 2002. Photochemical responses and oxidative stress in two clones of Coffea canephora under water deficit conditions. Environmental and Experimental Botany 47: 239-247.
27. Meinzer FC, Goldstein G, Grantz DA. 1990a. Carbon isotope discrimination in coffee genotypes grown under limited water supply. Plant Physiology 92: 130-135.
28. Meinzer FC, Grantz DA, Goldstein G, Saliendra NZ. 1990b. Leaf water relations and maintenance of gas exchange in coffee cultivars grown in drying soil. Plant Physiology 94: 1781-1787.
29. Melkonian JJ, Wolfe J, Steponkus PL. 1982. Determination of the volumetric modulus of elasticity of wheat leaves by pressure-volume relations and the effects of drought conditioning. Crop Science 22: 116-123.
30. Munns R. 1988. Why measure osmotic adjustment? Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 5: 207-218.
31. Neter J, Wasserman W. 1974. Applied linear statistical models. Regression, analysis of variance and experimental designs. Illinois: Richard D. Irwin Inc.
32. Pinheiro HA, DaMatta FM, Chaves ARM, Fontes EPB, Loureiro ME. 2004. Drought tolerance in relation to protection against oxidative stress in clones of Coffea canephora subjected to long-term drought. Plant Science 167: 1307-1314.
33. Praxedes SC, DaMatta FM, Loureiro ME, Ferrão MAG, Cordeiro AT. 2005. Effects of long-term soil drought on photosynthesis and carbohydrate metabolism in mature robusta coffee (Coffea canephora Pierre var. kouillou) leaves. Environmental and Experimental Botany, in press.
34. Rezende AM, Rosado PL. 2004. A informação no mercado de café. In: Zambolim L, ed. Produção integrada de café. Viçosa: Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 1-46.
35. Tausend PC, Goldstein G, Meinzer FC. 2000. Water utilization, plant hydraulicproperties and xylem vulnerability in three contrasting coffee (Coffea arabica) cultivars. Tree Physiology 20: 159-168.
36. Turner NC. 1997. Further progress in crop water relations. Advances in Agronomy 58: 293-338.
37. White DA, Turner NC, Galbraith JH. 2000. Leaf water relations and stomatal behavior of four allopatric Eucalyptus species planted in Mediterranean southwestern Australia. Tree Physiology 20: 1157-1165.
38. Willson KC. 1999. Coffee, cocoa and tea. Cambridge: CABI Publishing.