E-health and the Universitas 21 organization: 3. Global policy

Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 225-229

  Scott, Richard E ^a   Lee, Anna ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; HEALTH; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; REVIEW; TELEMEDICINE;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; HEALTH POLICY; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; TELEMEDICINE; WORLD HEALTH;

EID: 23644449561     PISSN: 1357633X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/1357633054471867     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Mechael PN. Integrating Information and Communication Technology to Improve Global Health: A Conceptual Framework. UK Partnership for Global Health and Nuffield Trust, 2002. See http://www.ukglobalhealth.org/content/Text/ Integrating_Information_and_Communication_Technology_to_Improve_Global_Health. doc (last checked 25 March 2005)
2. United Nations Development Programme. Today's technological transformations - creating the network age. In: Ross-Larson B, Leites J, eds. Human Development Report 2001 - Making New Technologies Work for Human Development. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001:27-64
3. Giorgianni SJ, Grana J, Scipioni L. Impact of technology on global health: perspectives and promise. Pfizer J 2001;5:4-37
4. Wang X, Turner L, Scott RE. Technology solutions - saving the day? Sixth Annual Canadian Society of Telehealth Conference, Halifax, Nova Scotia, 5-7 October 2003
5. European Commission. e-Health - Making Healthcare Better for European Citizens: An Action Plan for a European e-Health Area, 2004. See http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/pri/en/dpi/cnc/doc/2004/com2004_0356en01.doc (last checked 23 March 2005)
6. Simpson RL. Issues in telemedicine: why is policy still light-years behind technology? Nurs Adm Q 2002;26:81-4
7. Rigby M. The management and policy challenges of the globalization effect of informatics and telemedicine. Health Policy 1999;46:97-103
8. Scott RE, Palacios MF. e-Health: challenges of going global. In: Scott CM, Thurston WE, eds. Collaboration in Context. Calgary, Alberta: Institute for Gender Research and Health Promotion Research Group, University of Calgary, 2003:45-55
9. Loane M, Wootton R. A review of guidelines and standards for telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare 2002;8:63-71
10. Nohr LE. Global medicine and licensing. J Telemed Telecare 2000;6(suppl. 1):170-2
11. Jennett PA, Scott RE, Affleck Hall L, et al. Policy implications associated with the socioeconomic and health system impact of telehealth: a case study from Canada. Telemed J E-Health 2004;10:77-83
12. Bilimoria NM. Telemedicine: laws still need a dose of efficiency. J Med Pract Manage 2003;18:289-94
13. Scott RE, Chowdhury MF, Varghese S. Telehealth policy: looking for global complementarity. J Telemed Telecare 2002;8(suppl. 3):55-7
14. Kickbusch I. Global+local=glocal public health. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999;53:451-2
15. Bridges.org. Spanning the Digital Divide - Understanding and Tackling the issues. A Report by bridges.org. See http://www.bridges.org/spanning/pdf/ spanning_the_digital_divide.pdf (last checked 8 February 2005)
16. Ho K, Sharman Z. E-health and the Universitas 21 organization: 1. Global e-health through synergy. J Telemed Telecare 2005;11:218-20
17. Johnson G, Scholes K, Sexty RW. Exploring Strategic Management. Scarborough, Ontario: Prentice Hall, 1989
18. Casebeer A. Application of SWOT analysis. Br J Hosp Med 1993;49:430-1
19. Kaul I, Faust M. Global public goods and health: taking the agenda forward. Bull World Health Organ 2001;79:869-74
20. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Guidelines on the Protection of Privacy and Transborder Flows of Personal Data. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 1981. See http://www.oecd.org/document/18/0%2C2340%2Cen_2649_34255_1815186_1_1_1_1%2C00. html (last checked 23 March 2005)
21. European Commission. Council Directive of 24 July 1995 on the Protection of Individuals with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data, 1995. See http://145.18.106.100/doc/telecomrecht/eu/en/ 95_46_EC.pdf (last checked 25 March 2005)
22. Legislative Assembly of British Columbia. Fourth Session, Thirty-Sixth Parliament. Special Committee on Information Privacy in the Private Sector. Report. See http://www.legis.gov.bc.ca/cmt/36thParl/priv_ps/Reports/ report010320.htm (last checked 25 March 2005)
23. European Commission. eEurope 2005: An Information Society for All. 2002. See http://europa.eu.int/information_society/eeurope/2002/news_library/ documents/eeurope2005/eeurope2005_en.pdf (last checked 23 March 2005)
24. Scott R. Investigating e-health policy - tools for the trade. J Telemed Telecare 2004;10:246-8
25. Scott RE, Jennett PA, Hebert MA, Rush B. Telehealth and e-Health Policy Considerations for Alberta (revised). Alberta Health and Wellness, August 2004. See http://www.fp.ucalgary.ca/telehealth/Team%20Members/Publications/ Alberta%20e-Health%20Policy%20Report-Ver2-FIN%20FIN.pdf (last checked 24 March 2005)
26. Scott RE, Jennett PA, Yeo M. Access and authorization in a glocal e-health policy context. Int J Med Inform 2004;73:259-66
27. Labonte R, Spiegel J. Setting Global Health Research Priorities. Précis of a Discussion Paper Prepared for the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Institute of Population and Public Health. SPHERU, 2001. See http://www.spheru.ca/PDF%20Files/IPPH%20Long%20Complete%20PDF.pdf (last checked 23 March 2005)