Psychometric evaluation of the Motor Readiness Questionnaire for Stroke

Clinical Rehabilitation

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 531-537

  Page, Stephen J ^a   Garner, Christopher ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services of the Berkshires   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MOTIVATION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; REHABILITATION CENTER; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF REPORT; STROKE; THEORETICAL MODEL; TIME; UNITED STATES;

CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSYCHOMETRICS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REHABILITATION CENTERS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 23644447056     PISSN: 02692155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/0269215505cr847oa     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change in smoking: toward an integrative model change. J Consult Clin Psychol 1983; 21: 390-95.
2. Marcus BH, Forsyth LH. The challenge of behaviour change. Med Health RI 1997; 80: 300-302.
3. Prochaska JO, Velcier WF. The transtheoretical model of health behaviour change. Am J Health Promot 1997; 12: 38
4. Marcus BH, Selby VC, Niaura RS et al. Self-efficacy and the stages of exercise behaviour change. Res Q Exerc Sport 1992; 63: 60-66.
5. Bandura A. Editorial. Am J Health Promot 1997; 12: 8-10.
6. Prochaska JO, Norcross JC, Fowler JL, Follick, MJ, Abrams DB. Attendance and outcome in a work site weight control program: Processes and stages of change as process and predictor variables. Add Behav 1992; 11: 5-45.
7. Prochaska JO, Redding CA, Harlow LL, Rossi JS, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of change and HIV prevention: A review. Health Educ Q 1994; 21: 471-86.
8. Marcus BH, Owen N. Motivational readiness, self-efficacy, and decision making for exercise. J Appl Soc Psychol 1992; 22: 3-16.
9. Ockene JK. Ockene JK. Primary care-based smoking interventions. Nicotine Tob Res 1999; 1 (suppl 2): S189-93; discussion S207-10.
10. Kerns RD, Rosenberg R, Jamison RN, Caudill MA, Haythornthwaite I. Readiness to adopt a self-management approach to chronic pain: the Pain Stages of Change Questionnaire. Pain 1997; 12: 327-34.
11. Bombardier CH, Heinemann AW. The construct validity of the readiness to change questionnaire for persons with TBI. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2000; 15: 696-709.
12. Bombardier CH, Rimmele CT. Alcohol use and readiness to change after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988; 12: 1110-15.
13. Duncan PW. Synthesis of intervention trails to improve motor recovery following stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 1997; 3: 1-20.
14. Page, SJ, Sisto S, Johnston MJ, Levine P. Modified constraint-induced therapy after subacute stroke: A preliminary study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002; 16: 290-95.
15. Werner C, Von Frankenberg S, Treig T, Konrad M, Hesse S. Treadmill training with partial body weight support and an electromechanical gait trainer for restoration of gait in subacute stroke patients: a randomized crossover study. Stroke 2002; 33: 2895-901.
16. Page SJ, Levine P, Sisto S, Bond Q, Johnston MV. Stroke patients' and therapists' opinions of constraint-induced movement therapy. Clin Rehabil 2002; 16: 55-60
17. Schaumburg S, Pierce S, Gaffney K, Gershkoff A. Constraint-induced therapy: moving research into practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine, Orlando, FL, 16 October, 1999.
18. Prochaska JO, Norcross JC, Fowler JL, Follick MJ, Abrams DB. Attendance and outcome in a work site weight control program: processes and stages of change as process and predictor variables. Addict Behav 1992; 11: 5-45.
19. Maclean N, Pound P, Wolfe C, Rudd A. The concept of patient motivation: a qualitative analysis of stroke professionals' attitudes. Stroke 2002; 33: 444-48.
20. Teng EL, Chui HC. The Modified Mini-Mental State Exam. J Clin Psychiatry 1987; 48: 314-18.
21. Wright BD. Rasch models overview. J Appl Meas 2000; 1: 83-106.
22. Bode RK, Heinemann AW, Semik P. Measurement properties of the Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test and improvement patterns during rehabilitation. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2000; 15: 637-55.
23. Anderson EM. Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81: S15-20.
24. Page, SJ Assessing stroke patients' readiness to begin motor rehabilitation: pilot results of a new questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 1492 (abstract).
25. Marcus BH, Rakowski W, Rossi JS. Assessing motivational readiness and decision making for exercise. Health Psychol 1992; 11: 257-61.
26. Marcus BH, Simkin LH. The transtheoretical model: applications to exercise behaviour. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1993; 26: 1400-404.
27. Peterson TR, Aldana SG. Improving exercise behaviour: an application of the stages of change model in a worksite setting. Am J Health Promot 1999; 13: 229-32.
28. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory, third edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
29. Cattell RB. The scientific use of factor analysis. New York: Plenum, 1978.