The outcomes of using self-study modules in energy conservation education for people with multiple sclerosis

Clinical Rehabilitation

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 475-481

  Lamb, Alisa L ^a,c,d   Finlayson, Marcia ^a   Mathiowetz, Virgil ^b   Chen, Hua Yun ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c CARLE FOUNDATION HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; EDUCATION PROGRAM; ENERGY CONSERVATION; EXPERIENCE; FATIGUE; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPIST; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PATIENT EDUCATION; PHYSICAL CAPACITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RATING SCALE; SELF CONCEPT; SELF EVALUATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

ENERGY METABOLISM; FATIGUE; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDIES; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS;

EID: 23644445654     PISSN: 02692155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/0269215505cr851oa     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Krupp LB Mechanisms, measurement and management of fatigue in multiple sclerosis. In: Multiple sclerosis: clinical challenges and controversies. London: Martin Dunitz, 1997: 283-94.
2. Fisk JD, Pontefract A, Ritvo PG, Archibald CJ, Murray TJ. The impact of fatigue on patients with multiple sclerosis. Can J Neurol Sci 1994; 21: 9-14.
3. Mathiowetz V, Matuska KM, Murphy ME. Efficacy of an energy conservation course for persons with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 449-56.
4. Welham L. Occupational therapy for fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis. Br J Occup Ther 1995; 58: 507-509.
5. Punwar A J Occupational therapy principles and practice, second edition. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1994.
6. Multiple Sclerosis Council for Clinical Practice Guidelines. Fatigue and multiple sclerosis: evidence-based management strategies for fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Washington, DC: Paralyzed Veterans of America, 1998.
7. Ward N, Winters S. Results of a fatigue management programme in multiple sclerosis. Br J Nurs 2003; 12: 1075-1080.
8. Kinkel RP Fatigue in multiple sclerosis: reducing the impact through comprehensive management. Int J MS Care 2000; 2: 3-10.
9. Packer TL, Brink N Sauriol A. Managing fatigue: a six-week course for energy conservation. Tucson, AZ: Therapy Skill Builders, 1995.
10. Mathiowetz V, Finlayson M, Matuska K, Chen H, Lou P. Randomized controlled trial of an energy conservation for persons with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler (in press).
11. Ware JE, Snow K, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 health manual and interpretation guide. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 1993.
12. Little RJA, Yau L. Intent-to-treat analysis for longitudinal studies with drop-out. Biometrics 1996; 52: 1324-33.
13. SAS Institute Inc. SAS guide for personal computers, version 8.0. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 2000
14. Adler PK, Rawlinson M, Crabtree K Hallburg JC. Effectiveness of teaching methods for renal patients. AANNT J 1983; 10: 9-16.
15. Johnston JM, Jansen GR, Anderson J, Kendall P. Comparison of group diet instruction to a self-directed education program for cholesterol reduction. J Nutr Educ 1994; 26: 140-45.