Grafts in pelvic reconstructive surgery

Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 713-723

  Griffis, Kenneth ^a   Hale, Douglass S ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; MARLEX; MERSILENE; POLITEF; POLYESTER; POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATE; POLYGLACTIN; POLYGLYCOLIC ACID; POLYPROPYLENE;

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CONFERENCE PAPER; DERMIS; FASCIA LATA; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INCISIONAL HERNIA; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; PLASTIC SURGERY; POROSITY; RIGIDITY; SKIN ALLOGRAFT; SMALL INTESTINE MUCOSA; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TENSILE STRENGTH; THICKNESS; VAGINA RECONSTRUCTION;

BIOPROSTHESIS; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; PELVIS; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; SURGICAL MESH; TRANSPLANTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE PROLAPSE;

EID: 23644432032     PISSN: 00099201     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.grf.0000171738.50426.19     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. Kidney Transplantation. University of Edinburgh Medical School. Available at: www.portfolio.mvm.ed.ac.ulc/studentwebs/ session5/37/CL_otherhistory.htm. Accessed May 8, 2005.
2. Guidance for the Preparation of a Premarket Notification Application for a Surgical Mesh. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Devices Branch; Division of General and Restorative Devices. US Department of Health and Human Services; Document shelf number 2247. Available at: http:// www.fda.gov/cdrh/index.html.
3. Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, et al. Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg. 2004;240:578-583.
4. Benson JT, Lucente V, McClellan E. Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:1418-1421.
5. Sze EH, Kohli N, Miklos JR, et al. A retrospective comparison of abdominal sacrocolpopexy with Burch colposuspension versus sacrospinous fixation with transvaginal needle suspension for the management of vaginal vault prolapse and coexisting stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1999;10:390-393.
6. Cumberland VH. A preliminary report on the use of prefabricated nylon weave in the repair of ventral hernia. Med J Aust. 1952;1:143-144.
7. Scales JT. Material for hernia repair. Proc R Soc Med. 1953;46:647-652.
8. Sand PK, Koduri S, Lobel RW, et al. Prospective randomized trial of polyglactin 910 mesh to prevent recurrence of cystoceles and rectoceles. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184:1357-1362.
9. Weber AM, Walters MD, Piedmonte MR, et al. Anterior colporrhaphy: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:1299-1304.
10. Tyrell J, Silberman H, Chandrasoma P, et al. Absorbable versus permanent mesh in abdominal operations. SGO. 2003;168:227-233.
11. Cosson M, Debodinance P, Boukerrou M, et al. Mechanical properties of synthetic implants used in the repair of prolapse and urinary incontinence in women: which is the ideal material? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003;14:169-178.
12. Kobashi KC, Dmochowski R, Mee SL, et al. Erosion of woven polyester pubovaginal sling. J Urol. 1999;162:2070-2072.
13. Shuhaiber H, Chugh T, Burns G. In vitro adherence of bacteria to sutures in cardiac surgery. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1989;30:749-753.
14. Chu CC, Welch L. Characterization of morphologic and mechanical properties of surgical mesh fabrics. J Biomed Mater Res. 1985;19:903-916.
15. Rempen A, Kraus M. Measurement of head compression during labor: preliminary results. J Perinat Med. 1991;19:115-120.
16. Amid PK. Classification of biomaterials and their related complications in abdominal wall hernia surgery. Hernia. 1997;1:15-21.
17. Dietz HP, Vancaillie P, Svehla M, et al. Mechanical properties of urogynecologic implant materials. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003;14:239-243.
18. Cholhan HJ. Graft materials in urogynecologic and reconstructive pelvic surgery. American Urogynecologic Society Quarterly Report. 1999;18:1-4.
19. Walter AJ. Update on graft materials for pelvic reconstructive surgery. American Urogynecologic Society Quarterly Report. 2001;20:1-4.
20. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, et al. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:501-506.
21. Maher C, Baessler K, Glazener CMA, et al. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;18:4.
22. Bezerra CA, Bruschini H. Suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;CD001754.
23. Maher CF, Qatawneh AM, Dwyer PL, et al. Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a prospective randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:20-26.
24. Lo T-S, Wang AC. Abdominal colposacropexy and sacrospinous ligament suspension for severe uterovaginal prolapse: a comparison. J Gynecol Surg. 1998;14:59-64.
25. Hung MJ, Liu FS, Shen PS, et al. Factors that affect recurrence after anterior colporrhaphy procedure reinforced with four-corner anchored polypropylene mesh. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2004;15:399-406.
26. Julian TM. The efficacy of Marlex mesh in the repair of severe, recurrent vaginal prolapse of the anterior midvaginal wall. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:1472-1475.
27. Visco AG, Weidner AC, Barber MD, et al. Vaginal mesh erosion after abdominal sacral colpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184:297-302.
28. Culligan P, Blackwell L, Goldsmith LJ, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing fascia lata and synthetic mesh for sacral colpopexy. Accepted May 2005. Obstet Gynecol. Presented at the Annual American Urogynecologic Society Meeting; 2004; San Diego.
29. Cervigni M, Natale F. The use of synthetics in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Curr Opin Urol. 2001;11:429-435.
30. Klosterhalfen B, Klinge U, Hermanns B, et al. [Pathology of traditional surgical nets for hernia repair after long-term implantation in humans.] Chirurgie. 2000;71:43-51.
31. Coda A, Bendavid R, Botto-Micca F, et al. Structural alterations of prosthetic meshes in humans. Hernia. 2003;7:29-34.
32. FitzGerald MP, Mollenhauer J, Brubaker L. Failure of allograft suburethral slings. BJU Int. 1999;84:785-788.
33. Gandhi S, Kubba LA, Botros SM, et al. Histopathologic changes of porcine dermal implants used for transvaginal suburethral slings. Presented at the Annual American Urogynecologic Society Meeting; 2004; San Diego.
34. Ellerkman R, McBride A, Bent A. Comparison of long-term outcomes of autologous fascia lata slings to Suspend Tutoplast fascia lata allograft slings for stress incontinence. Presented at the Annual American Urogynecologic Society Meeting; 2004: San Diego.
35. Davis TL, Lukacz ES, Luber KM, et al. Determinants of patient satisfaction after the tension-free vaginal tape procedure. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:176-181.
36. Novi JM, Jeronis S, Morgan MA, et al. Sexual function in women with pelvic organ prolapse compared to women without pelvic organ prolapse. J Urol 2005;173:1669-1672.
37. Wren PA, Janz NK, Brubaker L, et al. Reliability of health-related quality-of-life measures 1 year after surgical procedures for pelvic floor disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:780-788.