Integrating ERP using EAI: A model for post hoc evaluation

European Journal of Information Systems

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 162-174

  Sharif, Amir M ^a   Irani, Zahir ^a   Love, Peter E D ^b  

^a BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b EDITH COWAN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

EAI; ERP; ERPII; Evaluation; Post hoc model; Tailorability

Indexed keywords

EID: 23444443365     PISSN: 0960085X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000533     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. AKKERMANS H and VAN HELDEN K (2002) Vicious and virtuous cycles in ERP implementation: a case study of interrelations between critical success factors. European Journal of Operational Research 11, 35-46.
2. AL-MUDIMIGH A, ZAIRI M and AL-MASHARI M (2000) ERP software implementation: an integrative framework. European Journal of Information Systems 10(4), 216-226.
3. ASH CG and BURN JM (2003) Assessing the benefits from e-business transformation through effective enterprise management. European Journal of Information Systems 12(6), 297-308.
4. BAKHT A (2003) Get ready for ERP, Part II Available, [on-line], http://www.tribuneindia.com/2003/20031201/login/guest.htmDecember 1st, 2003.
5. BLINCOE AJ (2001) The CRM vs ERP Showdown CompterWeekly.Com. Available [on-line]. http://www.computerweekly.co.uk/Article12728.htmJanuary 5th, 2001.
6. BOND B, GENOVESE Y, MIKLOVIC D, ZRIMSEK B and RAYNER N (2000) ERP is dead - long live ERP II. Gartner Group Research Note, Strategic Planning Assumption SPA-12-0420 4th October 2000, Gartner Group, Inc.
7. BONOMA TV (1985) Case research in marketing: opportunities, problems, and a process, Journal of Marketing Research 12, 199-208.
8. BREHM L, HEINZL A and MARKUS ML (2001) Tailoring ERP systems: a spectrum of choices and their implications. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Information Systems. Hawaii January 2001.
9. BUNNELL D (2000) Making the Cisco Connection : The Story Behind the Real Internet Superpower. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
10. CONNOR M (2001) Can you get more from your enterprise technologies? e-Business Advisor October/November 2001, pp. 16-19.
11. DAVIS D (1995) State of a new art: manufacturing and trading partners learn as they go. Manufacturing Systems 13(8), 2-10.
12. ECONOMIST (1999) ERP RIP? Economist Survey Ltd, The Economist (U.S. Edition), 26th June 1999.
13. ERICSON J (2001) What the heck is ERPII? Available, [on-line], http://www.line56.com/articles/default.asp?ArticleID = 285August 16th, 2001.
14. FIEDLER J (1978) Field Research: A Manual for Logistics and Management of Scientific Studies in Natural Settings. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, U.S.A.
15. GEISHECKER L (1999) ERP vs Best-of-Breed. Strategic Finance 80, 62-67.
16. HAKIM C (1987) Research design: Strategies and Choice in the Design of Social Research. Allen & Unwin, London, UK.
17. HIRT SC and SWANSON ER (1999) Adopting SAP at Siemens Corporation. Journal of Information Technology 14, 243-251.
18. IRANI Z, JONES S, LOVE PED, ELLIMAN T and THEMISTOCLEOUS M (2005) Evaluating information system investments in local government: drawing lessons from two welsh cases. Information Systems Journal 15(1), 61-82.
19. IRANI Z and LOVE PED (2001) The propagation of technology management taxonomies for evaluating information systems, Journal of Management Information Systems 17(3), 161-177.
20. IRANI Z, SHARIF AM and LOVE PED (2001) Transforming failure into success through organizational learning: an analysis of a manufacturing information system. European Journal of Information Systems 10(1), 55-66.
21. IRANI Z, THEMISTOCLEOUS M and LOVE PED (2003) The impact of enterprise application integration on information system lifecycles'. Information and Management 41 (2), 177-188.
22. LARSEN MA and MYERS MD (1999) When success turns into failure: a package-driven business process re-engineering project in the financial services industry, Journal of Strategic Information Systems 8, 395-417.
23. LEE J, SIAU K and HONG S (2003) Enterprise integration with ERP and EAI. Communications of the ACM 46(2), 54-60.
24. LI C (1999) [Electronic version] Information Systems Management 16(3), 31-36.
25. LINTHICUM D (1999) Enterprise Application Integration. Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts; MA, U.S.A.
26. LINTHICUM D (2001) Solve the integration puzzle: choose the right architecture. e-Business Advisor October/November 2001, pp 24-27.
27. MARKUS ML (2004) Technochange management : using IT to drive organizational change, Journal of Information Technology. 19, 3-19.
28. MCVITTIE L (2001) Buckle up: implementing ERP takes time and patience Network Computing. Available, [on-line]. http://www.networkcomputing.com/.
29. NELSON E and RAMSTAD E (1999) Trick or treat: Hershey's biggest dud has turned out to be new computer system. Wall Street Journal October 29, p.11.
30. PARR AN and SHANKS G (2002) A taxonomy of ERP implementation approaches. In Proceedings of 33rd Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences (HICSS), 2002.
31. PATEL NV and IRANI Z (1999) Evaluating information technology in dynamic environments: a focus on tailorable information systems. Logistics Information Management 12(1/2), 32-40.
32. PATEL NV and PAUL RJ (1998) Towards systems tailorability: a comparative analysis of business change and systems flexibility. Proc. Assoc. Information Systems, Americas Conference 14-16 August 1998, Baltimore, U.S.A.
33. POULOUDI A and SERAFEIMIDIS V (1999) Stakeholders in information systems evaluation:experience from a case study. In Proceedings of the 6th European IT Evaluation Conference November 4-5th, London, U.K pp 90-98.
34. SERAFEIMIDIS V and SMITHSON S (2000) Information systems evaluation in practice: a case study of organisational change. Journal of Information Technology 15(2), 93-106.
35. SHARIF AM, ELLIMAN T and BADII A (2004a) Integrating the IS with the Enterprise: key EAI research challenges. Journal of Enterprise Information Management 17(1/2), 164-170.
36. SHARIF AM, IRANI Z and THEMISTOCLEOUS M (2004b) Using ERP as a basis for enterprise application integration. In Proc. European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems 2004 (EMCIS 04) (Irani Z, Ed) June 2004, Tunis, Tunisia.
37. SHAUGHNESSY JJ and ZECHMEISTER EB (1994) Research methods in Psychology. 3rd edition. McGraw Hill: New York.
38. SPROTT D (2000) Componentizing the enterprise application packages. Communications of the ACM 43(4), 63-69.
39. STEFANOU CJ (2001) A framework for the ex-ante evaluation of ERP software. European Journal of Information Systems : 10(6), 204-215.
40. STONE FM (2002) The Oracle of Oracle: The Story of Volatile CEO Larry Ellison and the Strategies Behind His Company's Phenomenal Success. Amacom, New York, NY, USA.
41. TAPSCOTT D, TICOLL G and LOWY F (2000) Digital Capital. McGraw-Hill, New York.
42. THEMISTOCLEOUS M (2004) Justifying the decisions for EAI implementations. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. 17(2), 85-104.
43. THEMISTOCLEOUS M, IRANI Z and O'KEEFE RM (2001) ERP problems and application integration: exploratory survey. Business Process Management Journal 7(3), 195-204.
44. YIN RK (1994) Case study research: Design and Methods - 2nd Ed. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, U.S.A.
45. ZRIMSEK B (2003) Client issues for ERPII, supply chain and manufacturing. Gartner Group Article Top View, AV-20-959. Gartner Group Inc, Stanford, CT, USA.
46. ZRIMSEK B and BRANT K (2000) ERP adjustments - short-term friend, long-term foe. Gartner Group Commentary, COM-11-8900 20th September 2000, Gartner Group, Inc, Stanford, CT, USA.