Audits of crime and disorder: Some lessons from research

Crime Prevention and Community Safety

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 7-17

  Tierney, John ^a  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Audits; data; managerialism; mapping; partnerships; strategies

Indexed keywords

EID: 23444442348     PISSN: 14603780     EISSN: 17434629     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.cpcs.8140086     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. John Tierney is a Lecturer in Sociology in the Department of Sociology and Social Policy at the University of Durham, Elvet Riverside, New Elvet, Durham DH1 3JT.
2. There have been some less detailed evaluations and reviews: Home Office (1999) Statutory Partnerships: Pathfinder Sites Report. London: Home Office
3. National Association for the Care and Resettlement of Offenders (1999) Crime and Disorder Auditing. London: NACRO
4. Hayes, F. (1999) A Report on the First Audits and Strategies in the North East Region. Newcastle upon Tyne: Government Office for the North East.
5. For example, see, Hood, C. (1991) A Public Management for all Seasons? Public Administration. Vol. 69, No. 1, pp 3-19
6. Johnston, L. (2000) Policing Britain: Risk, Security and Governance. Harlow: Longman.
7. For example, see, Pearson, G., Blagg, H., Smith, D., Sampson, A. and Stubbs, P. (1992) Crime, Community and Conflict: The Multi-agency Approach. In Downes, D. (ed.) Unravelling Criminal Justice. London: Macmillan.
8. Home Office (1998) The Crime and Disorder Act: Guidance on Statutory Crime and Disorder Partnerships. Chapter Three: Auditing Crime and Disorder. London: Home Office, para. 3.11.
9. Hughes, G. (1998) Understanding Crime Prevention. Buckingham: Open University Press.
10. Morgan, J. (1991) Safer Communities: The Local Delivery of Crime Prevention through the Partnership Approach. Standing Conference on Crime Prevention. London: Home Office.
11. Hirschfield, A., Bowers, K., Pease, K. and Grundy, M. (1998) Counting on Crime: Results from a National Survey of Local Authorities and Police Forces. Municipal Review. December, pp 18-19.
12. Hough, M. and Tilley, N. (1998) Auditing Crime and Disorder: Guidance for Local Partnerships. Police Research Group, Crime Detection and Prevention Series, Paper 91. London: Home Office.
13. Home Office (1998) op cit, para. 3.42.
14. Home Office (1999) op cit.
15. For example, see, Clarkson, C., Cretney, A., Davis, G. and Shepherd, J. P. (1994) Assaults: The Relationship between Seriousness, Criminalisation and Punishment. Criminal Law Review. January.
16. For example, see, Trickett, A., Osborn, D. K., Seymour, J. and Pease, K. (1992) What is Different About High Crime Areas? British Journal of Criminology. Vol. 32, No. 1, pp 81-89
17. Home Office (1998) op cit
18. Crawford, A. (1999) The Local Governance of Crime: Appeals to Community and Partnerships. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Home Office (1999) op cit, para. 3.40.
20. For example, see, Farraro, K. (1995) Fear of Crime: Interpreting Victimization Risk. New York: SUNY Press
21. Walklate, S. (1998) Excavating the Fear of Crime: Fear, Anxiety or Trust? Theoretical Criminology. Vol. 2, No. 4, pp 403-418
22. Ditton, J. and Farrall, S. (eds.) (2000) The Fear of Crime. International Library of Criminology, Criminal Justice and Penology. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
23. Home Office (1998) op cit, para. 3.34.
24. Schmitter, P. C. (1974) Still the Century of Corporatism? Review of Politics. Vol. 36, pp 85-131.
25. Crawford, op cit.
26. Ericson, R. (1994) The Division of Expert Knowledge in Policing and Security. British Journal of Sociology. Vol. 45, No. 2, pp 149-175.
27. Feeley, M. and Simon, J. (1994) Actuarial Justice: The Emerging New Criminal Law. In Nelken, D. (ed.) The Futures of Criminology. London: Sage.
28. Sheptycki, J. (1997) Insecurity, Risk Suppression and Segregation: Some Reflections on Policing in the Transnational Age. Theoretical Criminology, Vol. 1, No. 3, p 306.
29. For example, see, Crawford, op cit.