Attitudes to independent dental hygiene practice: Dentists and dental hygienists in Ontario

Journal of the Canadian Dental Association

Volumn 70, Issue 8, 2004, Pages

  Adams, Tracey L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Dentistry manpower; Dissent and disputes; Interprofessional relations; Professional autonomy

Indexed keywords

CANADA; DENTAL ASSISTANT; DENTIST; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MALE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PUBLIC RELATIONS; REVIEW;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; DENTAL HYGIENISTS; DENTISTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; MALE; ONTARIO; PROFESSIONAL AUTONOMY;

EID: 23444437489     PISSN: 14882159     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. Landry D. Who's giving the orders? Probe 1994; 28(3):83.
2. Brownstone E. A qualitative study of the occupational status and culture of dental hygiene in Canada [PhD thesis]. Winnipeg (MB): University of Manitoba; 1999. p. 151.
3. CDHA. CDHA presents a brief to the commission on the future of health care. Probe 2002; 36(1):8.
4. Adams TL. Inter-professional conflict and professionalization: dentistry and dental hygiene in Ontario. Soc Sci Med 2004; 58(11):2243-52.
5. Health Professions Regulatory Advisory Council. Advice to the Minister of Health: Dental Hygiene Referral, May, 1996.
6. Manga, P. The independent practice of dental hygiene: political economy, professionalism and policy. Probe 1997; 31(1):16-8, 20-1.
7. ODA membership survey results revealed. ODA News 1994; (Sept):24.
8. ODA membership survey results: Part II. ODA News 1994; (Oct):56.
9. Kaldenberg DO, Smith JC. The independent practice of dental hygiene: a study of dentists' attitudes. Gen Dent 1990; 38(4):268-71.
10. Dillman DA. Mail and Internet surveys: the tailored design method. 2nd ed. New York (NY): John Wiley and sons; 2000.
11. Adams, T. Professionalization, gender and female-dominated professions: dental hygiene in Ontario. Cdn Rev of Soc and Anthro 2003; 40(3):267-89.