Self-regulatory trajectories in the shadow of public power: Resolving digital dilemmas in Europe and the United States

Governance

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 387-413

  Newman, Abraham L ^a   Bach, David ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b IE BUSINESS SCHOOL   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2342662845     PISSN: 09521895     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0952-1895.2004.00251.x     Document Type: Review

References (89)

1. Alter, Karen J. 1996. The European Court's Political Power: The Emergence of the European Court as an Influential Actor in Europe. West European Politics 19: 458-487.
2. Andrews, Edmund L. 1999. U.S.-European Union Talks on Privacy Are Sputtering. The New York Times, May 27, C6.
3. Bach, David. 2000. International Cooperation and the Logic of Networks: Europe and the Global System of Mobile Communications (GSM). BRIE Working Paper 139.
4. Badaracco, Joseph L. Jr. 1985. Loading the Dice. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
5. Beesom, Ann, and Chris Hansen. 1997. Fahrenheit 451.2: Is Cyberspace Burning? Wye Mills, MD: American Civil Liberties Union.
6. Bennett, Colin J. 1992. Regulating Privacy: Data Protection and Public Policy in Europe and the United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
7. Bolkestein, Frits. 2002. Closing Remarks. Presented at the European Commission Conference on Data Protection, Brussels, October 1.
8. Burley, Anne-Marie, and Walter Mattli. 1993. Europe Before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration. International Organization 1:41-76.
9. Castells, Manuel. 1996. The Rise of the Network Society. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
10. Clinton, William J., and Albert Gore. 1997. A Framework for Global Electronic Commerce. Washington, DC.
11. Coase, Ronald. 1960. The Problem of Social Cost. The Journal of Law and Economics 1:1-44.
12. Cohen, Stephen S., J. Bradford DeLong, and John Zysman. 2000. Tools for Thought: What Is New and Important about the "E-conomy." Berkeley: BRIE, University of California, Berkeley.
13. Commission of the European Communities. 1996. Illegal and Harmful Content on the Internet. Brussels: European Communities.
14. _. 1998. Globalization and the Information Society: The Need for Strengthened International Co-ordination. Brussels: European Communities.
15. _. 2000. Commission Issues Reports on Parental Control Technology Aimed at Enhancing Safety of Internet. RAPID, June 15.
16. _. 2003a. Safer Internet. Luxembourg: European Communities. Available online at http://europa.eu.int/information_society/programmes/iap/ index_en.htm.
17. _. 2003b. Information Society Technologies. Luxembourg: European Communities.
18. Dart, Bob. 1997. Summit Aims to Make Internet Safe for Kids. The Atlanta Journal and Constitution, November 30, C3.
19. de Jonquie'res, Guy. 1998. Rifts Remain on Internet Rules. The Financial Times, October 12, 4.
20. European Communities. 1999. Decision No. 276/1999/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 January 1999 Adopting a Multiannual Community Action Plan on Promoting Safer Use of the Internet by Combating Illegal and Harmful Content on Global Networks.
21. European Information Service. 1998. Data Protection: No EU Plan to Impose upon Non-Community Countries. European Report, March 7.
22. Evans, Peter B. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23. Farrell, Henry. 2001. Negotiating Privacy Across Arenas: The EU-US "Safe Harbor" Discussions. In Adrienne Héritier, ed., The Provision of Common Goods: Governance across Multiple Arenas, pp. 101-123. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield.
24. _. 2003. Constructing the International Foundations of E-commerce: The EU-US Safe Harbor Arrangement. International Organization 2:277-306.
25. Federal Trade Commission. 1999. Self-Regulation and Privacy Online: A Report to Congress. Washington, DC: Federal Trade Commission.
26. _. 2000. Privacy Online: Fair Information Practices in the Electronic Marketplace: A Federal Trade Commission Report to Congress. Washington, DC: Federal Trade Commission.
27. Froomkin, A. Michael. 2000. Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA and the Constitution. Duke Law Journal 17-184.
28. George, Alexander L. 1979. Case Studies and Theory Development: The Method of Structured, Focused Comparison. In Paul Gordon Lauren, ed., Diplomacy: New Approaches in History, Theory, and Policy, pp. 43-68. New York: Free Press.
29. Glimstedt, Hendrik. 2001. Competitive Dynamics of Technological Standardization: The Case of Third Generation Cellular Communications. Industry and Innovation 1:49-78.
30. Goodison, Donna. 2002. Web Ad Service Ends Privacy Flak; DoubleClick Settlement Changes Policy. The Boston Herald, August 27, 33.
31. Gunningham, Neil, and Joseph Rees. 1997. Industry Self-Regulation: An Institutionalist Perspective. Law & Policy 4:363-414.
32. Hall, Peter A. 1999. The Political Economy of Europe in an Era of Interdependence. In Herbert Kitschelt, Peter Lange, Gary Marks, and John D. Stephens, eds., Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism, pp. 135-156. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
33. Hall, Peter A., and Daniel W. Gingerich. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Complementarities in the Macroeconomy: An Empirical Analysis. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, CA.
34. Hall, Peter A., and David Soskice. 2001. An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism. In Peter A. Hall and David Soskice, eds., Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, pp. 1-68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Hargreaves, Deborah, and J. Leffall. 2000. Brussels in Push for VAT on Internet Sales. The Financial Times, June 5, 9.
36. Harvard Law Review. 1999. Developments - The Law of Cyberspace. Harvard Law Review: 1574-1704.
37. Hentoff, Nat. 1995. Senate's Cybercensors. Washington Post, July 1, A27.
38. Hooghe, Liesbet. 2001. The European Commission and the Integration of Europe: Images of Governance. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
39. Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks. 1999. The Making of a Polity: The Struggle over European Integration. In Herbert Kitschelt, Peter Lange, Gary Marks, and John D. Stephens, eds., Continuity and change in contemporary capitalism, pp. 70-100. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
40. _. 2000. Multi-level Governance and European Integration. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
41. Iversen, Torben, Jonas Pontusson, and David W. Soskice, eds. 2000. Unions, Employers, and Central Banks: Macroeconomic Coordination and Institutional Change in Social Market Economies. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
42. Kagan, Robert A. 1997. Should Europe Worry about Adversarial Legalism, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 2:165-184.
43. _. 2000. How Much Do National Styles of Law Matter? In Robert A. Kagan and Lee Axelrad, eds., Regulatory Encounters: Multinational Corporations and American Adversarial Legalism, pp. 1-32. Berkeley: University of California Press.
44. _. 2001. Adversarial Legalism: The American Way of Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45. Knill, Christoph. 2000. Private Governance Across Multiple Arenas: European Interest Associations as Interface Actors. Bonn: Max-Planck- Projektgruppe Recht der Gemeinschaftsgüter.
46. _. 2001. The Europeanisation of National Administrations: Patterns of Institutional Change and Persistence. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
47. Knill, Christoph, and Dirk Lehmkuhl. 2002a. Private Actors and the State: Internationalization and Changing Patterns of Governance. Governance 1:41-63.
48. _. 2002b. Governance and Globalization: Conceptualizing the Role of Public and Private Actors. In Adrienne Héritier, ed., Common Goods: Reinventing European and International Governance, pp. 85-104. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
49. Lane, Charles. 2002. Justices Partially Back Cyber Pornography Law. Washington Post, May 14, A3.
50. Lessig, Lawrence. 1998. What Things Regulate Speech: CDA 2.0 vs. Filtering. Jurimetrics Journal 629-670.
51. Levy, Jonah D., Robert Kagan, and John Zysman. 1997. The Twin Restorations: The Political Economy of the Reagan and Thatcher 'Revolutions.' In Lee-Jay Cho and Yoon Hyung Kim, eds., Ten Paradigms, of Market Economies, pp. 3-58. Seoul: Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements.
52. Lewis, Peter H. 1996. Limiting a Medium Without Boundaries: How Do You Let the Good Fish Through the Net While Blocking the Bad? The New York Times, January 15.
53. Locke, Richard, and Kathleen Thelen. 1998. Problems of Equivalence in Comparative Politics: Apples and Oranges, Again. APSA-CP Newsletter 1:9-12.
54. Lohr, Steve. 2000. Survey Shows Few Trust Promises on Online Privacy. The New York Times, April 17.
55. Lundvall, Bengt-Åke, ed. 1992. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. New York: St. Martin's Press.
56. Majone, Giandomenico. 1996. Regulating Europe. New York: Routledge.
57. Marks, Gary, Liesbet Hooghe, and Kermit Blanck. 1996. European Integration from the 1980s: State-Centric vs. Multi-Level Governance. Journal of Common Market Studies 3:341-378.
58. Marsden, Christopher T., ed. 2000. Regulating the Global Information Society. New York: Routledge.
59. Mayntz, Renate, and Fritz W. Scharpf, eds. 1995. Gesellschaftliche Selbstregelung und Politische Steuerung [Societal Self-Regulation and Political Governance.]. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
60. Migdal, Joel S. 1988, Strong Societies and Weak States: State-Society Relations and State Capabilities in the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
61. Mitchener, Brandon. 2002. Increasingly, Rules of Global Economy Are Set in Brussels. The Wall Street Journal, April 23, A1.
62. Newman, Abraham L., and David Bach. 2003. Privacy and Regulation in a Digital Age. In Harry Bouwman, Brigitte Preissl, and Charles Steinfield, eds., E-Life after the Dot.Com Bust, pp. 249-270. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
63. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 1980. Guidelines on the Protection of Privacy and Transborder Flows of Personal Data. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
64. Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
65. Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
66. Regan, Priscilla. 1995. Legislating Privacy. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
67. Risse, Thomas. 1996. Exploring the Nature of the Beast: International Relations Theory and Comparative Policy Analysis Meet the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies 1:53-80.
68. Ruggie, John Gerard. 1993. Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations. International Organization 1:139-174.
69. Sandholtz, Wayne. 1992. High-Tech Europe: The Politics of International Cooperation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
70. _. 1993. Institutions and Collective Action: The New Telecommunications in Western Europe. World Politics 2:242-270.
71. Scharpf, Fritz W., ed. 1993. Games in Hierarchies and Networks: Analytical and Empirical Approaches to the Study of Governance Institutions. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
72. _. 1994. Community and Autonomy: Multi-Level Policy Making in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 2:219-242.
73. _. 1997. Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
74. Schauer, Frederick. 1998. Internet Privacy and The Public-Private Distinction. Jurimetrics 4:555-564.
75. Schwartz, John. 1995. On-line Obscenity Bill Gains in Senate; Panel Backs Legislation; Critics See Threat to First Amendment. Washington Post, March 24, A1.
76. Shapiro, Carl, and Hal R. Varian. 1999. Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
77. Simitis, Spiros. 1995. From the Market to the Polis: The EU Directive on the Protection of Personal Data. Iowa Law Review 445+.
78. Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
79. Soskice, David. 1999. Divergent Production Regimes: Coordinated and Uncoordinated Market Economies in the 1980s and 1990s. In Herbert Kitschelt, Peter Lange, Gary Marks, and John D. Stephens, eds., Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism, pp. 101-134. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
80. Stone Sweet, Alec, Wayne Sandholtz, and Neil Fligstein. 2001. The Institutionalization of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
81. Streeck, Wolfgang, and Philippe C. Schmitter, eds. 1985. Private Interest Government: Beyond Market and State. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
82. Swire, Peter P., and Robert E. Litan. 1998. None of Your Business: World Data Flows, Electronic Commerce, and the European Privacy Directive. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
83. Swisher, Kara. 1995. Ban on On-Line Smut Opposed: High-Tech Coalition Pushes Software Allowing Parents to Decide. Washington Post, July 18, D3.
84. The BRIE-IGCC E-conomy Project, ed. 2001. Tracking a Transformation: E-Commerce and the Terms of Competition in Industries. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
85. Verrue, Robert. 1999. Electronic Commerce in Europe: The Present Situation. Presented at the Seminar on Electronic Commerce, Kangaroo Group-European Parliament, Brussels, January 20.
86. Vogel, David. 1986. National Styles of Regulation: Environmental Policy in Britain and the United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
87. _. 1995. Trading Up: Consumer and Environmental Regulation in a Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
88. Waldmeir, Patti. 2001. Good Intentions that Could Kill E-Commerce: A Treaty to Enforce Laws in Cross-Border Disputes Threatens an Unwieldy Solution to a Manageable Problem. The Financial Times, May 31, 16.
89. Wallace, Helen, and William Wallace. 2000. Policy-Making in the European Union, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.