Motes and beams: Some observations on an IR(ME)R inspection in radiotherapy

British Journal of Radiology

Volumn 77, Issue 916, 2004, Pages 273-275

  Munro, A J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; IONIZING RADIATION; PALLIATIVE THERAPY; PREOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; RADIATION BEAM; RADIATION DOSE FRACTIONATION; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIOLOGIST; RADIOTHERAPY; RECTUM CANCER; LEGAL ASPECT; NOTE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION MONITORING; RADIATION PROTECTION; STANDARD;

HUMANS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIATION MONITORING; RADIATION PROTECTION; RADIOTHERAPY; RADIOTHERAPY DOSAGE;

EID: 2342655692     PISSN: 00071285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/96768668     Document Type: Editorial

References (5)

1. Nisbet A, Cocker M. Experiences of a proactive IR(ME)R inspection in radiotherapy. Br J Radiol 2004;77:329-32.
2. Board of the Faculty of Clinical Oncology. Equipment, workload and staffing for radiotherapy in the UK 1997-2002. London, UK: Royal College of Radiologists, 2003.
3. Verellen D, Vinh-Hung V, Bijdekerke P, Nijs F, Linthout N, Bel A, et al. Characteristics and clinical application of a treatment simulator with CT-option. Radiother Oncol 1999;50: 355-66.
4. Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations 2000 (Statutory Instrument 2000 No. 1059). London, UK: HMSO, 2000. [www.legislation.hmso.gov.uk/si/si2000/20001059.htm, accessed 6 January 2004.]
5. Department of Health. The Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations 2000, together with notes on good practice. [www.doh.gov.uk/irmer.htm, accessed 6 January 2004.]