Antidumping jumping: Reciprocal antidumping and industrial location

Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv

Volumn 134, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 340-362

  Haaland, Jan I ^a   Wooton, Ian ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2342628368     PISSN: 00432636     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/bf02708100     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Anderson, J. E. (1992). Domino Dumping, I: Competitive Exporters. American Economic Review 82 (1) 65-83.
2. Anderson, S. P., N. Schmitt, and J.-F. Thisse (1995). Who Benefits from Antidumping Legislation? Journal of International Economics 38 (3/4): 321-337.
3. Belderbos, R. A. (1997). Antidumping and Tariff Jumping: Japanese Firms' DFI in the European Union and the United States. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 133 (3): 419-457.
4. Bhagwati, J. N., E. Dinopoulos, and K.-Y. Wong (1992). Quid Pro Quo Foreign Investment. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 82 (2): 186-190.
5. Brander, J. A., and P. R. Krugman (1983). A 'Reciprocal Dumping' Model of International Trade. Journal of International Economics 15 (3/4): 313-323.
6. Brander, J. A., and B. J. Spencer (1987). Foreign Direct Investment with Unemployment and Endogenous Taxes and Tariffs. Journal of International Economics 22 (3/4): 257-279.
7. Clarida, R. H. (1993). Entry, Dumping, and Shakeout. American Economic Review 83 (1): 180-202.
8. Cordella, T., and I. Grilo (1995). 'Social Dumping' and Delocalization: Is There a Case for Imposing a Social Clause? Paper presented at the European Research Workshop in International Trade, Thessaloniki.
9. Cuevas, A. (1992). The Invisible Grip of Antidumping Laws: A Model of 'Reciprocal Antidumping' Enforcement. Discussion Paper 161. Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University.
10. Devault, J. M. (1993). Economics and the International Trade Commission. Southern Economic Journal 60 (2): 463-478.
11. Dixit, A. (1988). Antidumping and Countervailing Duties under Oligopoly. European Economic Review 32 (1): 55-68.
12. Gruenspecht, H. K. (1988). Dumping and Dynamic Competition. Journal of International Economics 25 (3/4): 225-248.
13. Haaland, J. I., and I. Wooton (1992). Market Integration, Competition, and Welfare. In L. A. Winters (ed.), Trade Flows and Trade Policy After '1992'. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Hartigan, J. C. (1996). Perverse Consequences of the GATT: Export Subsidies and Switching Costs. Economica 63 (February): 153-161.
15. Horstmann, I. J., and J. R. Markusen (1992). Endogenous Market Structures in International Trade (natura facit saltum). Journal of International Economics 32 (1/2): 109-129.
16. Pinto, B. (1986). Repeated Games and the 'Reciprocal Dumping' Model of Trade. Journal of International Economics 20 (3/4): 357-366.
17. Prusa, T. J. (1992). Why Are so Many Antidumping Petitions Withdrawn? Journal of International Economics 33 (1/2): 1-20.
18. Reitzes, J. D. (1993). Antidumping Policy. International Economic Review 34 (4): 745-763.
19. Smith, A., and A. J. Venables (1988). Completing the Internal Market in the European Community: Some Industry Simulations. European Economic Review 32 (7): 1501-1525.
20. Staiger, R. W., and F. A. Wolak (1992). The Effects of Antidumping Law in the Presence of Foreign Monopoly. Journal of International Economics 32 (3/4): 265-287.
21. Vandenbussche, H. (1994). 'Twin Cases' Cartels and European Antidumping Policy. Report 94/307, SESO, Universitaire Faculteiten St.-Ignatius te Antwerpen.
22. Webb, M. (1987). Antidumping Laws, Production Location and Prices. Journal of International Economics 22 (3/4): 363-368.
23. _ (1992). The Ambiguous Consequences of Antidumping Laws. Economic Inquiry 30 (3): 437-448.