Historical Archaeology: An Outlook from the Argentinean Pampas

International Journal of Historical Archeology

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 113-131

  Pedrotta, Victoria ^a   Romero, Facundo Gómez ^a  

^a Prog Estud Arqueologicos P   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Archaeological remains; Fortlet Mi ana; Written evidence

Indexed keywords

EID: 2342619642     PISSN: 10927697     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1022666314752     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Albuquerque, M. (1996). Assentamentos militates: uma perspectiva de abordagem. Historical Archaeology in Latin America 14: 19-38.
2. Archivo General De La Nación (AGN) Consulta de documentos varios, Sección Coman dancia de Fronteras, Sala X del Período Nacional Gobierno, Buenos Aires.
3. Babits, L. (1988). Military records and historical archaeology. In Beaudry, M. C. (ed), Documentary Archaeology in the New World, Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, pp. 119-125.
4. Barros, A. (1957). Fronteras y territorios federales de las pampas del sud, Editorial Hachette, Buenos Aires, (Originally published in 1872).
5. Barros, A. (1975). Indios, Fronteras y seguridad interior, Editorial Hachette. Buenos Aires. (Originally published in 1876.)
6. Beaudry, M. (1988). Introduction. In Beaudry, M. C. (ed), Documentary Archaeology in the New World, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1-3.
7. Binford, L. (1962). Archaeology as anthropology. American Antiquity 28: 217-225.
8. Binford, L. (1972). An Archaeological Perspective, Seminar Press, New York.
9. Binford, L. (1983). Historical Archaeology: Is Historical or Archaeological? Working at Archaeology, Academic Press, New York, pp. 169-179.
10. Binford, L. (1989). The new archaeology then and now. In Lamberg-Karlovsky, C. C. (ed.), Archaeological thought in America, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 50-62.
11. Braudel, F. (1980). On History, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
12. Burke, P. (1992). History and Social Theory, Polity Press, Cambridge.
13. Burke, P. (1993). La revolución historiográfica francesa, la escuela de los annales: 1929-1989, Editorial Gedisa, Barcelona.
14. Champion, T. C. (ed.) (1989). Center and Periphery, Comparative Studies in Archaeology. Routledge, London.
15. Champion, T., Gamble, C., Shennan, S., and Whittle, A. (1988). Prehistoria de Europa, Editorial Critica, Barcelona.
16. Charlton, T. H. (1981). Archaeology, ethnohistory, and ethnology. Interpretive interfaces. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.), Advances in Archaeology Method and Theory, Vol. 4, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 129-175.
17. Clarke, D. (1973). Archaeology: The loss of innocence. Antiquity 47: 6-18.
18. Cleland, C., and Fitting, J. (1968). The crisis of identity: Theory in historic sites archaeology. The Conference on Historic Site Archaeology Papers 2: 124-138.
19. Crivelli Montero, E. (1990). Un campo de huesos secos: la arqueología argentina en el último decenio. In Berbeglia, E. (ed.), Propuesta para una Antropología Argentina, Editorial Biblos, Buenos Aires.
20. Curbelo, C. (1996). Una tentativa de análisis espacial en arqueología histórica: la Bahía de Maldonado. Historical Archaeology in Latin America, 16: 103-119.
21. Curbelo, C., and Cabrera, L. (1993). Arqueología histórica en Isla Gorriti. Revista Patrimonio Cultural. MEC 2: 7-38 (Montevideo).
22. Darcy Ribeiro (1971). Fronteras indígenas de la civilización, Editorial Siglo XXI, México.
23. Deagan, K. (1982). Avenues of inquiry in historical archaeology. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.), Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 2, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 151-173.
24. Deagan, K. (1988). Neither history nor prehistory: The questions that count in historical archaeology. Historical Archaeology 22(1): 7-12.
25. Deagan, K. (1991). Historical Archaeology's contributions to our understanding of early America. In Falk, L. (ed.), Historical Archaeology in Global Perspective, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 97-112.
26. Deetz, J. (1988). History and archaeological theory: Walter Taylor revisited. American Antiquity 53: 13-22.
27. Deetz, J. (1991). Archaeological evidence of sixteenth and seventeenth century encounters. In Falk, L. (ed.), Historical Archaeology in Global Perspective, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 1-10.
28. Earle, T., and Preucel, R. (1987). Processual archaeology and the radical critique. Current Anthropology 28: 501-538.
29. Ebelot, A. (1968). Recuerdos y relatos de la guerra de fronteras, Editorial Hachette, Buenos Aires. (Originally published in 1876).
30. Fairbanks, C. (1984). The plantation archaeology of the southeastern coast. Historical Archaeology 18: 1-14.
31. Feinman, G. (1997). Thoughts on new approaches to combining the archaeological and historical records. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 4: 367-377.
32. Ferguson, L. (1977). Historical archaeology and the importance of material things. In Ferguson, L. (ed.) (19xx). Historical Archaeology and the Importance of Material Things, Society for Historical Archaeology, Special Publication 2, pp. 5-8.
33. Flannery, K. (1972). The cultural evolution of civilizations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 3: 399-426.
34. Fletcher, R. (1993). Time perspectivism, Annales, and the potential of archaeology. In Knapp, B. (ed.), Archaeology, Annals and Ethnohistory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 35-49.
35. Fox, R. (1993). Archaeology, History and Custer's Last Battle, University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.
36. Funari, P. P. (1995). A cultura material de Palmares: o estudo das relaçioes sociais de um quilombo pe la arqueología. Idéias 27: 37-42.
37. Funari, P. P. (1996). Arqueología e Historia, arqueologia mundial y de América del Sur. II Jornadas de Etnolinguistica, Rosario.
38. Funari, P. P. (1997). Archaeology, history and historical archaeology in South America. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 1: 189-206.
39. Fusco Zambetogliris, N. (1996). Crónica de un impacto anunciado. Historical Archaeology in Latin America 16: 1-10.
40. García Enciso, I. (1980). Tolderías, fuertes y fortines, EMECÉ Editores, Buenos Aires.
41. Geier, C. (1994). Toward a social history of the civil war: The Hatcher Cheatham site. In Geier, C., and Winter, S. (eds.) Look to the Earth: Historical Archaeology and the American Civil War, University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, pp. 191-214.
42. Geier, C., and Winter, S. (eds.) (1994). Look to the Earth: Historical Archaeology and the American Civil War, University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.
43. Gómez Romero, F. (1995). El caballo en la frontera del Sud (1855-1875). Historical Archaeology in Latin America 7: 62-92.
44. Gómez Romero, F. (1996). Un piso de ocupación del Fortín Miñana, Historical Archaeology in Latin America 14: 137-142.
45. Gómez Romero, F. (1997). Arqueología histórica en sitios militares de campaña: el caso el Fortín Miñana (1860-1869). IX Congreso Nacional de Arqueología Uruguaya, Colonia del Sacramento (in press).
46. Gómez Romero, F., and Ramos, M. (1994). Miñana's fortlet: Historical archaeology research. Historical Archaeology in Latin America 2: 15-30.
47. Goñi, R., and Madrid, P. (1996). Arqueología sin hornear: Sitios arqueológicos históricos y el Fuerte Blanca Grande. Revista Intersecciones 2: 1-24 (Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Olavarría).
48. Hodder, I. (1991). Archaeological theory in contemporary European societies: The emergence of competing traditions. In Hodder I. (ed.) Archaeological Theory in Europe, the Last Three Decades. Routledge, London, pp. 1-24.
49. Kelly, K. (1997). Using historically informed archaeology: Seventeenth and eighteenth century Hueda/European interaction on the coast of Benin. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 4: 353-366.
50. Kern, A. A. (1993). A arqueologia histórica e a sua contribuicão a pesquisa de história do Brasil, Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Histórica (SBPH), Anais da XIII Reuniao, Florianopolis, pp. 29-31.
51. Kern, A. A. (1996). O papel das teorias como instrumental heurístico para a reconstituição do passado. Histórica 1: 7-22 (PUCRS, Porto Alegre).
52. Knapp, B. (1993). Archaeology and Annales: time, space and change. In Knapp, B. (ed.), Archaeology, Annals, and Ethnohistory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1-22.
53. Lamberg-Karlovsky, C. C. (1989). Introduction, Archaeological Thought in America, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1-16.
54. Leonard, R. (1993). The persistence of an explanatory dilemma in contact period studies. In Rogers, J. D., and Wilson, S. M. (eds.) Ethnohistory and Archaeology, Approaches to Postcontact Change in the Americas, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 31-43.
55. Leone, M. (1986). Symbolic, structural and critical archaeology. In Meltzer, D. J., Fowler, D. D., and Sabloff, J. A. (eds), American Archaeology, Past and Future, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 415-438.
56. Lightfoot, K. (1995). Culture contact studies: Redefining the relationship between prehistoric and historical archaeology. American Antiquity 60: 199-217.
57. Little, B. (1994). People with history: an update on historical archaeology in the United States. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1: 5-40.
58. Little, B., and Shackel, P. (1996). The importance of historical archaeology in the United States. World Archaeological Bulletin 7: 97-107.
59. Luna, M. (1996). Delitos y delincuentes. Historia de ilícitos en el Azul del siglo XIX, Azul, Unpublished manuscript.
60. Majewski, T., and O'Brien, M. J. (1987). The use and misuse of nineteenth-century English and American ceramic in archaeological analysis. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.), Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 11, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 97-209.
61. Miller, G. (1991). Classification and economic scaling of 19th-century ceramics. In Miller, G. L., Jones, O., Ross, L., and Majewski, T (comps.), Approaches to Material Culture Research for Historical Archaeologists, Society for Historical Archaeology, Tucson, pp. 37-58.
62. Noble, V. (1996). Yesterday, today and tomorrow: A plea for change in the practice of historical archaeology. Historical Archaeology 30(2): 74-84.
63. Noël Hume, I. (1964). Archaeology: Handmaiden to history. North Carolina Historical Review 41: 215-225.
64. Orser, C. E., Jr. (1990). Archaeological approaches to New World plantation slavery. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.), Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 2, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 111-154.
65. Orser, C. E., Jr. (1996). A Historical Archaeology of the Modern World, Plenum Press, New York.
66. Otto, J. (1977). Artifacts and status differences: a comparison of ceramics from planter, overseer, and slave sites on an Antebellum Plantation. In South, S. (ed.), Research Strategies in Historical Archaeology, Academic Press, New York, pp. 91-118.
67. Patterson, T. (1990). Algunas tendencias teóricas de la posguerra en la arqueología estadounidense. Boletin de Antropología Americana 21: 5-23.
68. Pedrotta, V., and Gómez Romero, F. (1997). El roi de los datos escritos en las investigaciones de Arqueología Histórica. I Jornadas Regionales de Historia y Arqueología del Siglo XIX, Tapalqué, Pcia. de Buenos Aires pp. 41-50.
69. Politis, G. (1995). The socio-politics of the development of archaeology in hispanic South America. In Ucko, P. J. (ed.), Theory in Archaeology: A World Perspective. Routledge, London, pp. 197-228.
70. Ramos, M., and Gómez Romero, F. (1994). El Fortín Miñana: una investigación de arqueología histórica, noticia preliminar. In Actas del XI Congreso Nacional de Arqueología Argentina, San Rafael, Mendoza.
71. Ratto, S. (1994). Indios amigos e indios aliados, orígenes del "Negocio Pacífico" en la Provincia de Buenos Aires (1829-1832). Cuadernos del Instituto Ravignani 5, Ffyl (UBA), Buenos Aires.
72. Rojas Lagarde, J. (1984). El malón de 1870 a Bahía Blanca y la colonia Sauce Grande. Ediciones Culturales Argentinas, Buenos Aires.
73. Rubertone, P. (1996). Matters of inclusion: Historical archaeology and Native Americans. World Archaeological Bulletin 7: 77-86.
74. Sarramone, A. (1993). Catriel y los indios pampas de Buenos Aires, Editorial Biblos, Azul.
75. Schávelzon, D. (1988). Tipología de la loza arqueológica de Buenos Aires (1780-1900), Programa de Arqueología Urbana, Buenos Aires.
76. Schávelzon, D. (1991). Arqueología Historica de Buenos Aires: La cultura material porteña de los siglos XVIII y XIX, Editorial Corregidor, Buenos Aires.
77. Schiffer, M. (1972). Archaeological context and systemic context. American Antiquity 37: 156-165.
78. Schiffer, M. (1976). Behavioral Archaeology, Academic Press, New York.
79. Schiffer, M. (1987). Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.
80. Schuyler, R. (ed.) (1980). Archeological Perspectives on Ethnicity in America, Baywood Press, New York.
81. Scott, D., Fox, R., Conner, M., and Harmon, D. (1989). Archaeological Perspectives on the Battle of Little Big Horn, University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.
82. Senatore, M. X. (1995). Tecnologías nativas y estrategias de ocupación española en la región del Rio de la Plata. Historical Archaeology in Latin America 11: 1-120.
83. Servicio Histórico del Ejército (1852-1870): Consulta de documentos varios, Buenos Aires.
84. Singleton, T. (ed.) (1985). The Archaeology of Slavery and Plantation Life, Academic Press, New York.
85. Smith, M. (1993). Braudel's temporal rhythms and chronology theory in archaeology. In Knapp, B. (ed), Archaeology, Annals, and Ethnohistory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 23-34.
86. Smith, S. (1991). A comparison of the documentary evidence of material culture and the archaeological record: Store ledgers and two black tenant sites, Waverly Plantation, Mississippi. Volumes in Historical Archaeology, XII. University of South Carolina, Columbia.
87. Smith, S. (1994), Archaeological perspectives on the Civil War: The challenge to achieve relevance. In Geier, C., and Winter, S. (eds.), Look to the Earth: Historical Archaeology and the American Civil War. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, pp. 3-20.
88. South, S. (1977). Method and Theory in Historical Archaeology, Academic Press, New York.
89. South, S. (1978). Pattern recognition in historical archaeology. American Antiquity 43: 223-230.
90. South, S. (ed.) (1994). Pioneers in Historical Archaeology: Breaking a New Ground, Plenum Press, New York.
91. Stone, G. (1988). Artifacts are not enough. In Beaudry, M. C. (ed.), Documentary Archaeology in the New World, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 68-77.
92. Stone, L. M. (1974). Fort Michilimackinac 1715-1781: An Archaeological Perspective on the Revolutionary Frontier, Publications of the Museum, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
93. Thurston, T. (1997). Historians, prehistorians, and the tyranny of the historical record: Danish state formation through documents and archaeological data. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 4: 239-263.
94. Trigger, B. (1982). La arqueologia como ciencia histórica. Teorías, Métodos y Técnicas en Aqueoloǵa, Reimpresion de Antropologia Americana, Instituto Panamericano de Geografía e Historia, México, pp. 231-265.
95. Trigger, B. (1989). History and contemporary American archaeology. In Lamberg-Karlovsky, C. C. (ed.), Archaeological Thought in America, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 19-34.
96. Trigger, B. (1989). A History of Archaeological Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
97. Vargas Arenas, I. (1995). Arqueología, ciencia y sociedad: ensayo sobre teoría arqueológica y la formación económico social tribal en Venezuela, Editorial Abre Bretchas, Caracas.
98. Walther, J. C. (1964). La conquista del desierto, Eudeba, Buenos Aires.
99. Wilson, S. (1993). Structure and history: Combining archaeology and ethnohistory the contact period Caribbean. In Rogers, J. D., and Wilson, S. M. (eds.), Ethnohistory and Archaeology: Approaches to Postcontact Change in the Americas. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 19-30.
100. Zarankin, A. (1994). Arqueología urbana: hacia el desarrollo de una nueva especialidad. Historical Archaeology in Latin America 2: 31-40.