Outcomes for Cochlear Implant Users with Significant Residual Hearing: Implications for Selection Criteria in Children

Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

Volumn 130, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 575-581

  Dowell, Richard C ^a,b,c,d   Hollow, Rod ^b,d   Winton, Elizabeth ^b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b ROYAL VICTORIAN EYE AND EAR HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c BIONIC EAR INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^d Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; PATIENT SELECTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; CHILD; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; HEARING IMPAIRED PERSONS; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; PATIENT SELECTION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 2342608525     PISSN: 08864470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.130.5.575     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Shallop JK, Arndt PL, Turnacliff KA. Expanded indications for cochlear implantation: perceptual results in seven adults with residual hearing. J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol. 1992;16:141-148.
2. Fraysse B, Dillier N, Klenzner T, et al. Cochlear implants for adults obtaining marginal benefit from acoustic amplification: a European study. Am J Otol. 1998; 19:591-597.
3. Blamey P, Arndt P, Bergeron F, et al. Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol. 1996; 1:293-306.
4. Dowell RC. Speech perception for adults using cochlear implants. In: Plant P, Spens KE, eds. Profound Deafness and Speech Communication. London, England: Whurr Publishers; 1995:262-284.
5. Summerfield AQ, Marshall DH. Preoperative predictors of outcomes from cochlear implantation in adults: performance and quality of life. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1995;166:105-108.
6. Gantz BJ, Woodworth GG, Knutson JF, Abbas PJ, Tyler RS. Multivariate predictors of audiological success with multichannel cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1993;102:909-916.
7. Geers AE, Brenner C, Davidson L. Factors associated with the development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five. EarHear. 2003;24(1, suppl):24S-35S.
8. Dowell RC, Dettman SJ, Blamey PJ, Barker EJ, Clark GM. Speech perception in children using cochlear implants: prediction of long term outcomes. Cochlear Implants Int. 2002;3:1-18.
9. Shea JJ, Domico EH, Orchik DJ. Speech recognition as a function of duration of deafness in multichannel cochlear implant patients. Laryngoscope. 1990;100: 223-226.
10. Geier L, Barker M, Fisher L, Opie J. The effect of long-term deafness on speech recognition in postingually deafened adult CLARION cochlear implant users. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1999;177:80-83.
11. Waltzman SB, Cohen NL, Shapiro WH. The benefits of cochlear implantation in the geriatric population. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;108:329-333.
12. Buchman CA, Fucci MJ, Luxford WM. Cochlear implants in the geriatric popuation: benefits outweigh the risks. Ear Nose Throat J. 1999;78:489-494.
13. Shipp DB, Nedzelski JM. Prognostic indicators of speech recognition performance in adult cochlear implant users: a prospective analysis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1995;166:194-196.
14. Zwolan TA, Zimmerman-Phillips S, Ashbaugh CJ, et al. Cochlear implantation of children with minimal open set speech recognition skills. Ear Hear. 1997;18: 240-251.
15. Dawson PW, Blamey PJ, Rowland LC, et al. Cochlear implants in children, adolescents, and prelinguistically deafened adults: speech perception. J Speech Hear Res. 1992;35:401-417.
16. Boothmyd A, Hanin L, Hnath T. A Sentence Test of Speech Perception: Reliability, Set Equivalence and Short Term Learning: Internal Report RCI 10. New York: Speech and Hearing Sciences Research Centre, City University of New York; 1985.
17. Peterson GE, Lehiste I. Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. J Speech Hear Disord. 1962;27:62-70.
18. Skinner M, Fourakis M, Holden T, Holden L, Demorest M. Identification of speech by cochlear implant recipients with the Multipeak (MPEAK) and Spectral Peak (SPEAK) speech coding strategies. Ear Hear. 1996;17:182-197.
19. Plant KL, Whitford LA, Psarros CE, Vandali AE. Parameter selection and programming recommendations for the ACE and CIS speech-processing strategies in the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. Cochlear Implants Int. 2002;3:104-125.
20. Ching TYC, Psarros C, Hill M, Dillon H, Incerti P. Should children who use cochlear implants wear hearing aids in the opposite ear? Ear Hear. 2001;22:365-380.