Technical note: Determining peeling order using sparse matrix algorithms

Journal of Dairy Science

Volumn 85, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 1623-1629

  Fernandez S A ^a   Fernando, R L ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Peeling order; Sparse matrices

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BREEDING; CATTLE; FEMALE; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; MALE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PEDIGREE; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BREEDING; CATTLE; FEMALE; GENOTYPE; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; LINKAGE (GENETICS); MALE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PEDIGREE;

EID: 2342590085     PISSN: 00220302     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74233-1     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Beever, J. E., P. D. George, R. L. Fernando, and H. A. Lewin. 1990. Effects of genetic markers on growth and carcass traits in a paternal half-sib family of beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 68:337-344.
2. Bonney, G. E. 1992. Compound regressive models for family data. Hum. Hered. 42:28-41.
3. Cannings, C., E. A. Thompson, and E. Skolnick. 1978. Probability functions on complex pedigrees. Adv. Appl. Prod. 10:26-61.
4. Elston, R. C. 1990. Models for discrimination between alternative modes of inheritance. Pages 49-50 in Advances in Statistical Methods for Genetic Improvement of Livestock. D. Gianola and K. Hammond, eds. Springer-Verlag, New York.
5. Elston, R. C., K. K. Namboordiri, C. J. Glueck, R. Fallat, R. Tsang, and V. Leuba. 1975. Study of the genetic transmission of hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia in a 195 member kindred. Ann. Hum. Genet. 39:67-87.
6. Elston, R. C., and J. Stewart. 1971. A general model for the genetic analysis of pedigree data. Hum. Hered. 21:523-542.
7. Fernández, S. A. 2001. An algorithm to sample genotypes in complex pedigrees. Ph.D. Thesis. Iowa State University, Ames.
8. Fernández, S. A., R. L. Fernando, and A. L. Carriquiry. 1999. An algorithm to sample marker genotypes in a pedigree with loops. Section on Bayesian Statistical Science. Pages 60-65 in Proc. Am. Stat. Assoc., Alexandria, VA.
9. Fernández, S. A., R. L. Fernando, B. Guldbrandtsen, L. R. Totir, and A. L. Carriquiry. 2001. Sampling genotypes in large pedigrees with loops. Genet. Sel. Evol. 33:337-367.
10. Fernando, R. L., C. Stricker, and R. C. Elston. 1993. An efficient algorithm to compute the posterior genotypic distribution for every member of a pedigree without loops. Theor. Appl. Genet. 87:89-93.
11. Fernando, R. L., C. Stricker, and R. C. Elston. 1994. The finite polygenic mixed model: An alternative formulation for the mixed model of inheritance. Theor. Appl. Genet. 88:573-580.
12. Fernando, R. L., C. Stricker, and T. Wang. 1998. Detection and utilization of single genes without DNA assays. J. Dairy Sci. 81:62-75.
13. George, A., and J. W. H. Liu. 1981. Computer Solution of Large Positive Definite Systems. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
14. Hasstedt, S. J. 1982. A mixed model approximation for large pedigrees. Comput. Biomed. Res. 15:195-307.
15. Hasstedt, S. J. 1991. A variance components/major locus likelihood approximation on quantitative data. Genet. Epidemiol. 8:113-125.
16. Heath, S. C. 1997. Markov Chain Monte Carlo segregation and linkage analysis for oligogenic models. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 61:748-760.
17. Janss, L. L. G., R. Thompson, and J. A. M. Van Arendonk. 1995. Application of Gibbs sampling for inference in a mixed major gene-polygenic inheritance model in animal populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 91:1137-1147.
18. Janss, L. L., J. A. M. van Arendonk, and E. W. Brascamp. 1997a. Bayesian statistical analyses for presence of single genes affecting meat quality traits in a crossed pig population. Genetics 145:395-408.
19. Janss, L. L., J. A. M. van Arendonk, and E. W. Brascamp. 1997b. Segregation analyses for presence of major genes to affect growth, backfat and litter size in Dutch Meishan crossbreds. J. Anim. Sci. 75:2864-2876.
20. Jensen, C. S., A. Kong, and U. Kjærulff. 1995. Blocking Gibbs sampling in very large probabilistic expert systems. Int. J. Hum. Comp. Stud. 42:647-666.
21. Lange, K., and M. Boehnke. 1983. Extensions to pedigree analysis. V. Optimal calculation of Mendelian likelihoods. Hum. Hered. 33:291-301.
22. Lange, K., and R. C. Elston. 1975. Extensions to pedigree analysis. I. Likelihood calculations for simple and complex pedigrees. Hum. Hered. 25:95-105.
23. Rothschild, M. F., C. Jacobson, D. A. Vaske, C. Tuggle, L. Wang, T. Short, G. Eckardt, S. Sasaki, A. Vincent, D. G. McLaren, O. Sowthwood, H. van der Steen, A. Mileham, and G. Plastow. 1996. The Estrogen Receptor locus is associated with a major gene influencing litter size in pigs. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 93:201-205.
24. Sheehan, N. 1990. Genetic restoration on complex pedigrees. Ph.D. thesis. University of Washington, Seattle.
25. Sheehan, N., and A. Thomas. 1993. On the irreducibility of a Markov Chain defined on a space of genotype configurations by a sampling scheme. Biometrics 49:163-175.
26. Stricker, C., R. L. Fernando, and R. C. Eltson. 1995. An algorithm to approximate the likelihood for pedigree data with loops by cutting. Theor. Appl. Genet. 91:1054-1063.
27. Thomas, A. 1986a. Approximate computation of probability functions for pedigree analysis. 1986. IMA J. Math. Appl. Med. Biol. 3:157-166.
28. Thomas, A. 1986b. Optimal computation of probability functions for pedigree analysis. IMA J. Math. Appl. Med. Biol. 3:167-178.
29. Thomas, D., and V. Cortessis. 1992. A Gibbs sampling approach to linkage analysis. Hum. Hered. 42:63-76.
30. Wang, T., R. L. Fernando, C. Stricker, and R. C. Elston. 1996. An approximation to the likelihood for a pedigree with loops. Theor. Appl. Genet. 93:1299-1309.
31. Weller, J. I., M. Soller, and T. Brody. 1988. Linkage analysis of quantitative traits in an interspecific cross of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum x Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium) by means of genetic markers). Genetics 118:329-339.