Is precise discrimination of low level motion needed for heading discrimination?

NeuroReport

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 1013-1017

  Royden, Constance S ^a   Vaina, Lucia M ^b,c  

^a Department of Biology   (United States)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Heading; Optic flow; Structure from motion; Visual psychophysics

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; AGED; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION;

AGED; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION;

EID: 2342587532     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200404290-00016     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Royden CS, Crowell JA and Banks MS. Estimating heading during eye movements. Vis Res 34, 3197-3214 (1994).
2. Crowell JA and Banks MS. Perceiving heading with different retinal regions and types of optic flow. Percept Psychophys 53, 325-337 (1993).
3. Warren WH and Hannon DJ. Direction of self-motion is perceived from optical flow. Nature 336, 162-163 (1988).
4. Warren WH and Hannon DJ. Eye movements and optical flow. J Opt Soc Am A 7, 160-169 (1990).
5. Cutting JE, Springer K, Braren PA and Johnson SH. Wayfinding on foot from information in retinal, not optical, flow. J Exp Psychol Gen 121, 41-72 (1992).
6. Warren WH, Mestre DR, Blackwell AW and Morris MW. Perception of circular heading from optical flow. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perf 17, 28-43 (1991).
7. Warren WH, Blackwell AW, Kurtz KJ, Hatsopoulos NG and Kalish ML. On the sufficiency of the velocity field for perception of heading. Biol Cybern 65, 311-320 (1991).
8. van den Berg AV. Robustness of perception of heading from optic flow. Vis Res 32, 1285-1296 (1992).
9. Hildreth EC and Royden CS. Computing observer motion from optic flow. In: Watanabe T (ed.). High-level Visual Motion Processing. Computational, Neurobiological and Psychophysical Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1998. pp. 269-293.
10. Perrone JA and Stone LS. A model of self-motion estimation within primate extrastriate visual cortex. Vis Res 34, 2917-2938 (1994).
11. Longuet-Higgins HC and Prazdny K. The interpretation of a moving retinal image. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 208, 385-397 (1980).
12. Royden CS. Mathematical analysis of motion-opponent mechanisms used in the determination of heading and depth. J Opt Soc Am A 14, 2128-2143 (1997).
13. Heeger DJ and Jepson AD. Subspace methods for recovering rigid motion I: Algorithm and implementation. Int J Comput Vision 7, 95-117 (1992).
14. Lappe M and Rauschecker JP. A neural network for the processing of optic flow from ego-motion in man and higher mammals. Neural Comput 5, 374-391 (1993).
15. Vaina LM, Royden CS, Bienfang DC, Makris N and Kennedy D. Normal perception of heading in a patient with impaired structure-from-motion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 37(Suppl.): S137 (1996).
16. Vaina LM, Makris N, Kennedy D and Cowey A. The selective impairment of the perception of first-order motion by unilateral cortical brain damage. Vis Neurosci 15, 333-348 (1998).
17. Vaina L, Cowey A and Kennedy D. The neuroanatomical damage producing selective deficits to first or second order motion in stroke patients. Hum Brain Mapp 7, 67-77 (1999).
18. Dale A, Fischl B and Sereno M. Cortical surface-based analysis I: Segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage 9, 179-194 (1999).
19. Talairach J and Tournoux P. Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 1988.
20. Vaina LM and Soloviev S. First-order and Second-order Motion: Neurological Evidence for Neuroanatomically Distinct Systems. In: Heywood CH, Milner AD and Blakemore C (eds). The Roots of Visual Awareness. Progress in Brain Res, Vol. 144. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2004. pp. 197-213.
21. Newsome WT and Pare EB. A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT). J Neurosci 8, 2201-2211 (1988).
22. Hildreth EC. Recovering heading for visually-guided navigation. Vis Res 32, 1177-1192 (1992).
23. Beintema JA and van den Berg AV. Heading detection using motion templates and eye velocity gain fields. Vis Res 38, 2155-2179 (1998).
24. Beusmans JM. Perceived object shape affects the perceived direction of self-movement. Perception 27, 1079-1085 (1998).
25. Li L and Warren WH. Perception of heading during rotation: sufficiency of dense motion parallax and reference objects. Vis Res 40, 3873-3094 (2000).