Student and Cooperating Teachers: Contrasting Experiences in Teacher Preparation Programs

Action in Teacher Education

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 54-65

  Sandholtz, Judith Haymore ^a   Wasserman, Kathleen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2342585834     PISSN: 01626620     EISSN: 21586098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01626620.2001.10463075     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Berliner, D. C., 1988. “ Implications of studies in pedagogy for teacher education and evaluation ”. In New directions for teacher assessment, Edited by: Pfleiderer, J., 39–68. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
2. Bullough, R. V., 1990. Supervision, mentoring, and self-discovery: A case study of a first year teacher. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 5: 338–360.
3. Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy. 1986. A nation prepared: Teachers for the 21st century, New York: Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy.
4. Dadlez, S. H., and Sandholtz, J. H., 2001. “ The link between teacher education and beginning teachers' development ”. In Research on the effects of teacher education on teacher performance: Teacher education yearbook IX, Edited by: Rainer, J., and Guyton, E. M., 153–168. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
5. Darling-Hammond, L., 1994. “ Developing professional development schools: Early lessons, challenge and promise ”. In Professional development schools: Schools for developing a profession, Edited by: Darling-Hammond, L., 1–27. New York: Teachers College Press.
6. Fleener, C., 1998. A comparison of attrition rates, Commerce, Texas: Texas A & M University. Unpublished doctoral dissertation
7. Fuller, F., 1969. Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal, 6: 207–226.
8. George, A. A., 1978. Measuring self, task, and impact concerns: A manual for use on the teacher concerns questionnaire, Austin: Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, University of Texas at Austin. (ERIC Document No. 175 845)
9. Griffin, G. A., 1985. Teacher induction: Research issues. Journal of Teacher Education, 36 (1): 42–46.
10. Griffin, G. A., 1989. “ Clinical teacher education ”. In Reality and reform in clinical teacher education, Edited by: Hoffman, J. V., and Edwards, S. A., 1–24. New York: Random House.
11. Grossman, P., 1994. “ In pursuit of a dual agenda: Creating a middle level professional development school ”. In Professional development schools: Schools for developing a profession, Edited by: Darling-Hammond, L., 50–73. New York: Teachers College Press.
12. Holmes Group. 1990. Tomorrow's schools: Principles for the design of professional development schools, East Lansing, MI: Author.
13. Kagan, D., 1992. Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62 (2): 129–169.
14. Kennedy, M. M., 1990. “ Choosing a goal for professional education ”. In Handbook of research on teacher education, Edited by: Houston, W. R., Haberman, M., and Sikula, J., 813–825. New York: Macmillan.
15. Lanier, J., and Little, J. W., 1986. “ Research on teacher education ”. In Handbook of research on teaching, 3rd ed., Edited by: Wittrock, M., 527–568. New York: Macmillan.
16. Levine, M., 1992. “ A conceptual framework for professional practice ”. In Professional practice schools: Linking teacher education and school reform, Edited by: Levine, M., 8–24. New York: Teachers College Press.
17. Lewison, M., and Holliday, S., 1999. “ Investigating a school-university partnership through the lenses of relationship, self-determination, reciprocal influence, and expanding power ”. In Research on professional development schools: Teacher education yearbook VII, Edited by: Byrd, D., and McIntyre, D. J., 79–96. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
18. Lieberman, A., 1992. School/university collaboration: A view from the inside. Phi Delta Kappan, 74 (2): 147–155.
19. Miles, M. B., and Huberman, A. M., 1984. Qualitative data analysis, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20. Miller, L., and Silvernail, D., 1994. “ Wells Junior High School: Evolution of professional development school ”. In Professional development schools: Schools for developing a profession, Edited by: Darling-Hammond, L., 28–49. New York: Teachers College Press.
21. National Commission on Excellence in Education. 1983. A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
22. National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. 1996. What matters most: Teaching for America's future, New York: Author.
23. National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. 2001. Standards for professional development schools http://www.ncate.org/standard/m_stds.htm
24. Reinhartz, J., and Stetson, R., 1999. “ Teachers as leaders: A question or an expectation? ”. In Research on professional development schools: Teacher education yearbook VII, Edited by: Byrd, D., and McIntyre, D. J., 157–172. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
25. Sandholtz, J., and Dadlez, S., 2000. Professional development school trade-offs in teacher preparation and renewal. Teacher Education Quarterly, 27 (1): 7–28.
26. Sandholtz, J., and Merseth, K., 1992. Collaborating teachers in a professional development school: Inducements and contributions. Journal of Teacher Education, 43 (4): 308–317.
27. Sarason, S., Davidson, K., and Blatt, B., 1986. The preparation of teachers: An unstudied problem in education, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
28. Skillings, M. J., and Robbins, V., 1997. Competent and confident teachers: The legacy of professional development school training models. Issues in Teacher Education, 6 (1): 33–48.
29. Snyder, J., 1994. “ Perils and potentials: A tale of two professional development schools ”. In Professional development schools: Schools for developing a profession, Edited by: Darling-Hammond, L., 98–125. New York: Teachers College Press.
30. Task Force on Professional Development Schools. 1995. Professional development schools: What are they? What are the issues and challenges? How are they funded? How should they be evaluated? A Report of the Task Force on Professional Development Schools: Association of Colleges and Schools of Education in State Universities and Land-grant Colleges
31. Teitel, L., 1997. Professional development schools and the transformation of teacher leadership. Teacher Education Quarterly, 24 (1): 9–22.
32. Teitel, L., 2001. As assessment framework for professional development schools: Going beyond the leap of faith. Journal of Teacher Education, 52 (1): 57–69.
33. The Education Trust. 1998. Good teaching matters: How well-qualified teachers can close the gap, Washington, D.C.: Author.
34. Veenman, S., 1984. Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54: 143–178.
35. Winitzky, N., Stoddart, T., and O'Keefe, P., 1992. Great expectations: Emergent professional development schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 43 (1): 3–18.
36. Yerian, S., and Grossman, P. L., 1997. Preservice teachers' perceptions of their middle level teacher education experience: A comparison a of traditional and PDS model. Teacher Education Quarterly, 24 (4): 85–101.