Comparison of various vacuum mixing systems and bone cements as regards reliability, porosity and bending strength

Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica

Volumn 75, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 160-172

  Mau, Hans ^a   Schelling, Katrin ^a   Heisel, Christian ^a   Wang, Jian Shang ^b   Breusch, Steffen J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; IMPLANTATION; POROSITY; RELIABILITY; SHEAR STRENGTH; TENSILE STRENGTH; VACUUM;

BONE CEMENTS; MATERIALS TESTING; POROSITY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TENSILE STRENGTH; VACUUM;

EID: 2342582169     PISSN: 00016470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016470412331294415     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Alkire M J, Dabezies E J, Hastings P R. High vacuum as a method of reducing porosity of polymethylmethacrylate. Orthopedics 1987; 10: 1533-9.
2. Askew M J, Kufel M F, Fleissner P R, Gradisar I A, Salstrom S J, Tan J S. Effect of vacuum mixing on the mechanical properties of antibiotic-impregnated PMMA bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res 1990; 24: 573-80.
3. Bishop N E, Ferguson S, Tepic S. Porosity reduction in bone cement at the cement-stem interface. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1996; 78: 349-56.
4. Breusch S J, Berghof R, Schneider U, Weiß G, Simank H G, Lukoschek M, Ewerbeck V. Der Stand der Zementiertechnik bei Hüfttotalendoprothesen in Deutschland. Z Orthop 1999; 137: 101-7.
5. Charnley J. Acrylic cement in orthopaedic surgery. E&S Livingstone, Edinburgh and London 1970; 10-19: 23-35.
6. Draenert K. Zur Praxis der Zementverankerung. In: Forschung und Fortbildung in der Chirurgie des Bewegungsapparates 2 (Ed. Draenert K). München: Art and Science: 1988: 9-40.
7. Draenert K, Draenert Y, Garde U, Ulrich C. In: Manual of cementing technique. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York 1999.
8. Eyerer P, Jin R. Influence of mixing technique on some properties of PMMA bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res 1986; 20: 1057-94.
9. Geiger M H, Keating E M, Ritter M A, Ginther J A, Fans P M, Meding J B. The clinical significance of vacuum mixing bone cement. Clin Orthop 2001; 382: 258-66.
10. Hahn M, Engelbrecht E, Delling G. Eine quantitative Analyse zur Bestimmung der Porosität von vorkomprimiertem und unter Vakuum gemischtem Knochenzement. Chirurg 1990; 61: 512-7.
11. James S P, Jasty M, Davies J, Piehler H. A fractographic investigation of PMMA bone cement focusing on the relationship between porosity reduction and increased fatigue life. J Biomed Mater Res 1992; 26: 651-62.
12. Jasty J, Maloney W J, Bragdon C R, O'Connor D O, Haire T, Harris W H. The initiation of failure in cemented femoral components of hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1991; 73: 551-8.
13. Jasty M, Jiranek W, Harris W H. Acrylic fragmentation in total hip replacements and its biological consequences. Clin Orthop 1992; 285: 116-28.
14. Kühn K-D. Up-to-date comparison of physical and chemical properties of commercial materials. In: Bone cements. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York 2000.
15. Kurdy N M G, Hodgkinson J P, Haynes R. Acrylic bone cement: influence of mixer design and unmixed powder. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11: 813-9.
16. Lewis G. Effect of two variables on the fatigue performance of acrylic bone cement: mixing method and viscosity. Biomed Mater Eng 1999; 9 (4): 197-207.
17. Lewis G. Relative roles of cement molecular weight and mixing method on the fatigue performance of acrylic bone cement: Simplex P versus Osteopal. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 53 (1): 119-30.
18. Lewis G, Austin G E. Mechanical properties of vacuum-mixed acrylic bone cement. J Appl Biomat 1994; 5: 307-14.
19. Lidgren U, Drar H, Möller J. Strength of polymethylmethacrylate increased by vacuum mixing. Acta Orthop Scand 1984; 55: 536-41.
20. Lidgren U, Bodelind B, Möller J. Bone cement improved by vacuum mixing and chilling. Acta Orthop Scand 1987; 57: 27-32.
21. Linden U. Fatigue properties of bone cement. Comparison of mixing techniques. Acta Orthop Scand 1989; 60: 431-3.
22. Ling R S M, Lee A J C. Porosity reduction is clinically irrelevant. Clin Orthop 1998; 355: 249-53.
23. Malchau H, Herberts P, Söderman P, Odén A. Prognosis of total hip replacement: Update and validation of results from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register. 67th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, March 15-19, Orlando, USA 2000.
24. Maltry J A, Noble P C, Kamaric E, Tullos H S. Factors influencing pressurization of the femoral canal during cemented total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1995; 10: 492-7.
25. Müller-Wille P, Lidgren L. Boiling of monomer during high vacuum mixing of bone cement does not increase cement porosity, 6th EORS Conference, Bergen, Norway 1996: 50.
26. Müller-Wille P, Wang J S, Lidgren L. Integrated system for preparation of bone cement and effects on cement quality and environment. J Biomed Mater Res 1997; 38: 135-42.
27. Schreurs B W, Spierings P, Huiskes R, Slooff T. Effects of preparation techniques on the porosity of acrylic cements. Acta Orthop Scand 1988; 59: 403-9.
28. Smeds S, Goertzen D, Ivarsson I. Influence of temperature and vacuum mixing on bone cement properties. Clin Orthop 1997; 334: 326-34.
29. Wang J S, Kjellson F. Bone cement porosity in vacuum mixing systems. In: Bone cement and cementing technique (Eds. Walenkamp G H I M, Murry D W). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York 2001.
30. Wang J S, Franzen H, Jonsson E, Lidgren L. Porosity of bone cement reduced by mixing and collecting under vacuum. Acta Orthop Scand 1993; 64: 143-6.
31. Wang J S, Franzen H, Toksvig-Larsen S. A comparison of eight bone cement mixing systems. Acta Orthop Scand (Suppl 260) 1994; 65: 62.
32. Wang J S, Toksvig-Larsen S, Müller-Wille P, Franzen H. Is there any difference between vacuum mixing systems in reducing bone cement porosity? J Biomed Mater Res 1996; 33: 115-9.
33. Wilkinson J M, Eveleigh R, Hamer A J, Milne A, Miles A W, Stockley I. Effect of mixing technique on the properties of acrylic bone cement: a comparison of syringe and bowl mixing systems. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15: 663-7.
34. Wixson R L, Lautenschlager E P, Novak M A. Vacuum mixing of acrylic bone cement. J Arthroplasty 1987; 2: 141-9.