Comparison of similarity coefficients used for cluster analysis with dominant markers in maize (Zea mays L)

Genetics and Molecular Biology

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 83-91

  da Silva Meyer, Andréia ^a   Garcia, Antonio Augusto Franco ^a   Pereira de Souza, Anete ^b   Lopes de Souza Jr , Cláudio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

AFLP; Genetic divergence; Heterotic groups; Multivariate analysis; RAPD

Indexed keywords

AMPLIFIED FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIABILITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAIZE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PLANT BREEDING; PLANT GENETICS; RANDOM AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNA; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ZEA; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 2342577533     PISSN: 14154757     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s1415-47572004000100014     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Anderberg MR (1973) Clustering analysis for applications. London, Academic Press, 359 pp.
2. Barbosa AMM, Geraldi IO, Benchimol LL, Garcia AAF, Souza Jr CL and Souza AP (2003) Relationship of intra- and inter-population tropical maize single cross hybrid performance and genetic distances computed from AFLP and SSR markers. Euphytica 130:87-99.
3. Benchimol LL, Souza Jr. CL, Garcia AAF, Kono PMS, Mangolin CA, Barbosa AMM, Coelho ASG and Souza AP (2000) Genetic diversity in tropical maize inbred lines: heterotic group assignment and hybrid performance determined by RFLP markers. Plant Breeding 119:491-496.
4. Cruz CD and Viana JMS (1994) A Methodology of genetic divergence analysis based on sample unit projection on two-dimensional space. Revista Brasileira de Genética 17:69-73.
5. Cruz CD and Regazzi AJ (1997) Modelos biométricos aplicados ao melhoramento genético. Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, 390 pp.
6. Cruz CD (2001) Programa Genes: versão Windows; aplicativo computacional em genética e estatística. Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, 648 pp.
7. Dice LR (1945) Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 26:297-302.
8. Duarte MC, Santos JB and Melo LC (1999) Comparison of similarity coefficients based on RAPD markers in the common bean. Genetics and Molecular Biology 22:427-432.
9. Garcia AAF, Benchimol LL, Barbosa AMM, Geraldi IO, Souza Jr. CL and Souza AP (2004) Comparison of RAPD, RFLP, AFLP and SSR markers for diversity studies in tropical maize inbred lines. Genetics and Molecular Biology (submitted).
10. Hollander M (1973) Nonparametric statistical methods. New York, Wiley, 503 pp.
11. Jaccard P (1901) Étude comparative de la distribuition florale dans une portion des Alpes et des Jura. Bull Soc Vandoise Sci Nat 37:547-579.
12. Jackson AA, Somers KM and Harvey HH (1989) Similarity coefficients: measures for co-occurrence and association or simply measures of occurrence? American Naturalist 133:436-453.
13. Johnson RA and Wichern DW (1988) Applied multivariate statistical analysis. New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, 607 pp.
14. Kruskal JB (1964) Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nom-metric hypothesis. Psychometrika 29: 1-27.
15. Lanza LLB, Souza Jr. CL, Ottoboni LMM, Vieira MLC and Souza AP (1997) Genetic distance of inbred lines and prediction of maize single-cross performace using RAPD markers. Theoretical and Genetics Journal 94:1023-1030.
16. Ochiai A (1957) Zoogeographic studies on the soleoid fishes found in Japan and its neighbouring regions. Bull Jnp Soc Sci Fish 22:526-530.
17. Pinto RMC, Garcia AAF and Souza Jr. CL (2001) Alocação de linhagens de milho derivadas das populações BR - 105 e BR - 106 em grupos heteróticos. Scientia Agricola 3:541-548.
18. Rao RC (1952) Advanced statistical methods in biometric reserch. New York, J. Wiley, 390 pp.
19. Rogers JS and Tanimoto TT (1960) A computer program for classying plants. Science 132:1115-1118.
20. Rohlf FJ (1982) Consensus indices for comparing classifications. Mathematical Bioscience 59:131-144.
21. Rohlf FJ (1992) Program Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Version 1.70, New York.
22. Russel PF and Rao TR (1940) On habitat and association of species of anophelinae larvae in south-eastern Madras. J Malaria Inst India 3:153-178.
23. Sas Institute Inc. (1992) Statistical analysis system. Release 6.08, Cary, NC.
24. Skroch P, Tivang J and Nienhuis J (1992) Analysis of genetic relationships using RAPD marker data. In: Applications of RAPD technology to plant breeding. Symposia series, Madison, CCSA, ASHS, and AGMA, Minneapolis, pp 26-30.
25. Sneath PHA and Sokal RR (1973) Numeric taxonomy: the principles and practice of numerical classification. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, 573 pp.
26. Sokal RR and Michener CD (1958) A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. Univ Kans Sci Bull 38:1409-1438.
27. Sokal RR and Sneath PHA (1963) Principles of numeric taxonomy. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, 359 pp.
28. Sorensen T (1948) A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species content and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons. Vidensk Selsk Biol Skr 5:1-34.
29. Statistica Stat Soft Inc. '99 Edition (1999) - Quick reference. Tulsa, OK, USA.
30. Victória DC, Garcia AAF, Souza Jr. CL and Souza AP (2001) Desenvolvimento de um programa SAS para cálculo de coeficiente de similaridade de dados de marcadores moleculares utilizando bootstrap. (compact disc) Congresso Nacional de Genética 47, Aguas de Lindóia.
31. Vos P, Rogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, Van de Lee T, Homes M, Frijters A, Pot J, Peleman J, Kuipe M and Zabeau M (1995) AFLP: a new tecnique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Research 23:4407-4414.
32. Weir BS (1996) Genetic data analysis II. Mass, Sinuar Associates. 445 pp.
33. Willians JGK, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalski JA and Tingey SV (1990) DNA polimorfisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Research 18:7213-7218.