A Comparison of Digital Cameras: Features Essential for the Orthopaedic Surgeon

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 421, Issue , 2004, Pages 10-16

  Andres, Brett M ^a   Khanna, A Jay ^a   Wenz Sr , James F ^a   Faust, Alfred F ^a   Frassica, Frank J ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAMERA; COMPUTER; CONFERENCE PAPER; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; IMAGE QUALITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ORTHOPEDIC EQUIPMENT; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; PHOTOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; X RAY FILM;

EID: 2342575628     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000126867.07063.fb     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Snapshots without film. Consumer Reports November: 22-27, 2000.
2. Askey P, Askey J (eds): Digital photography review. Available at www.dpreview.com, 2001. Accessed July 2002.
3. Elbeshbeshy B, Trepman E: Digital photography in orthopaedic surgery. Foot Ankle Int 22:67-74, 2001.
4. Galdino GM, Swier P, Manson PN, Vander Kolk CA: Converting to digital photography: A model for a large group or academic practice. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:119-124, 2000.
5. Helm TN, Wirth PB, Helm KF: Inexpensive digital photography in clinical dermatology and dermatologic surgery. Cutis 65:103-106, 2000.
6. Howard B: Digital cameras: Is film dead? PC Magazine November 7:178-201, 2000.
7. Keller J, Barrus D, Baird A: (eds): Digital camera resource page. Available at www.dcresoume.com, 2001. Accessed July 2002.
8. Long B: One-megapixel cameras: Low-priced models deliver a range of features and image quality. Macworld October: 95-96, 2000.
9. McClelland D: Digital cameras develop. Macworld September: 78-84, 1999.
10. Wade FA, Oliver CW, McBride K: Digital imaging in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: Is it worth it? J Bone Joint Surg 82B:791-794, 2000.