An international perspective of privatization: The need to balance economic and social performance

American Review of Public Administration

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 316-332

  Prizzia, Ross ^a  

^a University of Hawaii West Oahu   (United States)

Author keywords

Balance; Economic; International; Privatization; Social

Indexed keywords

EID: 2342568436     PISSN: 02750740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0275074003252072     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. Adala, M. A. (1992). Distributional impact evaluation of divestiture in high inflation economy: The case of ENTEL Argentina. Doctoral dissertation, Boston University, Boston, MA.
2. Auster, B. B. (2000, April 24). The art of the (raw) deal. U.S. News and World Report, 22.
3. Ayres, R. (1995). Privatization and distributional equity: The case of Brazil. International Journal of Social Economics, 22(12), 36-48.
4. Bishop, M., Kay, J., & Mayer, C. (1994). Privatization and economic performance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
5. Bouton, L., & Sumlinski, M. (1997). Trends in private investment in developing countries: Statistics for 1970-95 (IFC Discussion Paper No. 31). Washington, DC: World Bank.
6. Centre for Public Services. (1995). Corruption increases with spread of CCT. Public Service Action, 49(50), 43-67.
7. Cunha, R. C. E., & Cooper, C. L. (1998). Privatization and the human factor. Journal of Applied Management Studies, 7(2), 201-211.
8. Domberger, S. (1993). Privatization: What does the British experience reveal? Economic Papers, 12(2), 58-68.
9. Domberger, S., Farago, S., Hall, C., & Li, E. (1993). Competitive tendering and contracting in the NSW public sector: 1993 findings. Sydney, Australia: University of Sydney, Graduate School of Business.
10. Duncan, I., & Bollard, A. (1992). Corporatisation and privatization. Auckland, New Zealand: Oxford University Press.
11. Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of the 21st century business. Oxford, UK: New Society Press.
12. Engen, J. R. (1994). Knowing better. World Trade, 7(2), 42-46.
13. Greene, J. D. (1994). Does privatization make a difference? The impact of private contracting on municipal efficiency. International Journal of Public Administration, 17(1), 1299-1325.
14. Greene, J. D. (1996). How much privatization? Policy Studies Journal, 24(4), 662-640.
15. Heracleous, L. (1999). Privatization global trends and implications of the Singapore experience. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 12(5), 432-444.
16. Hodge, G. A. (2000). Privatization: An international review of performance. Boulder, CO: Westview.
17. Hutchinson, G. A. (1991). Efficiency gains through privatization of UK industries. In A. F. Ott & K. Hartley (Eds.), Privatization and economic efficiency: A comparative analysis of developed and developing countries (pp. 87-107). Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.
18. Institute for Southern Studies. (2000). Private gain; public gain: How privatization harms communities. Durham, NC: Institute for Southern Studies Publications.
19. International Labor Organization. (1999, November). Managing the privatization and restructuring of public utilities (water, gas, electricity) Paper presented at the Tripartite Meeting on Managing the Privatization and Restructuring of Public Utilities, Geneva.
20. Johnson, B. T. (1994). Water privatization in the UK and the effects on consumers, public sector report (Newsletter of the Public Sector Research Centre). Sydney, Australia: University of New South Wales.
21. Kelsey, J. (1993). Rolling back the state: Privatization of power in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: Bridget Williams Books.
22. Lensing, W. C. (1994). A case study of social transformation in medical care at the community level. Doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas, Denton, TX.
23. Lorch, K. (1991). Privatization through private sale: The Bangladeshi textile industry. In R. Ramamurti & R. Vernon (Eds.), Privatization and control of state-owned enterprises (pp. 126-151). Washington DC: World Bank.
24. Martin, B. (2000). The social and employment consequences of privatization in transition economies: Evidence and guidelines (Working paper IPPREP-4). Geneva, Switzerland: International Labor Organization.
25. Martin, D. L., & Stein, R. M. (1993). An empirical analysis of contracting out local government services. In G. Bowman, S. Hakim, & P. Seidenstat (Eds.), Privatizing the United States justice system: Police, adjudication, and corrections services from the private sector (pp. 82-106). Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
26. McAndrew, B., Boyle, T., & Brennan, R. (2000, July 8). Before Walkerton, it was unthinkable that Ontario drinking water was anything but safe. Did provincial cutbacks help turn this precious natural resource into a potential killer? The Toronto Star, p. 23A.
27. McCollum, J. K., & Gentle-Marsh, M. (1995). Privatization in eight former socialist countries of eastern Europe. International Journal of Public Administration, 18(6), 941-986.
28. Megginson, W. L., & Bouchkoua, M. K. (1999). Privatization and the financing of enterprise: A comparative overview of the evidence. Paris: Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development.
29. Moussios, A. (1994). Hybrid status, regulation and performance: An empirical analysis of the denationalization of British Telecom. Doctoral thesis, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
30. Paddon, M. (1993). Taking contracting seriously: The current debate in the UK and Europe. In J. Coulter (Ed.), Doing more with less? Contracting out and efficiency in the public sector (n.p.). Kensington, New South Wales: University of New South Wales, Public Sector Research Centre.
31. Parker, D. (1995). Privatization and agency status: Identifying the critical factors for performance improvement. British Journal of Management, 6(1), 29-44.
32. Parker, D., & Hartley, K. (1991, February). Organizational status and performance: The effects on employment. Applied Economics, 23(2), 403-416.
33. Parker, D., & Martin, S. (1993, August). Testing time for privatization. Management Today, 44-47.
34. Pimentel, D., Westra, L., & Noss, R. (Eds.). (2000). Ecological integrity: Integrating environment, conservation, and health. Washington, DC: Island Press.
35. Poopat, T. (2000a, April 14). NGO's attack terms set for bail out loans. The Nation, p. 2A.
36. Poopat, T. (2000b, May 1). Thai push to privatize hits new law for old labor. World Paper, p. 3A.
37. Potts, N. (1999). Privatization: A false hope. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 12(5), 388-409.
38. Psacharopoulos, G., & Nguyen, N. X. (1997). The role of government and the private sector infighting poverty (Technical Paper No. 346). Washington, DC: World Bank.
39. Rimmer, S. (1993). Aspects of competitive tendering and contracting in local government administration. Doctoral dissertation, University of New England, Armidale, Australia.
40. Savas, E. S. (1987). Privatization: the key to better government. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
41. Savas, E. S. (2000). Privatization and public-private partnerships. New York: Chatham House.
42. Shultz, J. (2000, July 15). World Bank forced water privatization on Cochabamba. Minneapolis (Minneapolis) Star Tribune, p. 21A.
43. Siham, E. K., & Scrimgeour, F. (2002, June 18-22). The TQM/TBL dichotomy? Paper presented at the Hawaii International Conference on Business, Honolulu, HI.
44. Sinha, P. K. (1993). Analysis of privatization through public offerings. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Harrisburg, PA.
45. Soden, D. L., & Hennessey, T. M. (1999). Ecosystem management: The governance approach. In D. L. Soden & B. S. Steel (Eds.), Handbook of global environmental policy and administration (pp. 29-48). New York: Marcel Dekker.
46. Tyler Norris Associates. (1997). The community indicators handbook: Measuring progress toward healthy and sustainable communities. San Francisco: Author.
47. World Bank. (1995a). Contracting: What works, what doesn't, and why. Bureaucrats in business. Washington, DC: Author.
48. World Bank. (1995b). Labor and economic reforms in Latin America and the Caribbean (World Development Report Series). Washington, DC: Author.
49. World Bank. (1996). World Bank participation sourcebook. Washington, DC: Author.
50. World Bank. (1997). Bureaucrats are still in business. Bureaucrats in business. Washington, DC: Author.
51. World Bank. (1998). Privatization and labor: What happens to workers when governments divest? (World Bank Technical Paper No. 396). Washington, DC: Author.
52. World Bank. (1999a). Environmental implications of the economic crisis and adjustment in East Asia (East Asia Environment and Social Development Unit Discussion Paper Series No. 1). Washington, DC: Author.
53. World Bank. (1999b). The Manila social forum overview and future directions: Setting the new social agenda/or Central, East, and Southeast Asia. Social policy & governance in East Asia. Washington, DC: Author.
54. World Bank. (1999c). Privatization of the power and natural gas industries in Hungary and Kazakhstan (World Technical Paper No. 451). Washington, DC: Author.
55. World Bank. (2000). The quality of growth. New York: Oxford University Press.
56. World Bank. (2002). World development indicators [CD-ROM]. Washington, DC: Author.