The challenges of following patients and assessing outcomes in teledermatology

Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 21-24

  Krupinski, Elizabeth A ^a   Engstrom, Mike ^a   Barker, Gail ^a   Levine, Norman ^a   Weinstein, Ronald S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOPSY; CONSULTATION; CONTROL GROUP; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MEDICAL RECORD; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT REFERRAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; RURAL POPULATION; TELECOMMUNICATION; TELEDERMATOLOGY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ARTICLE; DERMATOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; SKIN DISEASE; STATISTICS; TELEMEDICINE;

DERMATOLOGY; HUMANS; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SKIN DISEASES; TELEMEDICINE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 2342562463     PISSN: 1357633X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/135763304322764149     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Krupinski EA, LeSueur B, Ellsworth L, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and image quality using a digital camera for teledermatology. Telemedicine Journal 1999;5:257-63
2. Whited JD, Hall RP, Simel DL, et al. Reliability and accuracy of dermatologists' clinic-based and digital image consultations. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 1999;41:693-702
3. Pak HS. Teledermatology and teledermatopathology. Seminars in Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery 2002;21:179-89
4. Nordal EJ, Moseng D, Kvammen B, Lochen ML. A comparative study of teleconsultations versus face-to-face consultations. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2001;7:257-65
5. Krupinski E, Barker G, Rodriguez G, et al. Telemedicine versus in-person dermatology referrals: an analysis of case complexity. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health 2002;8:143-7
6. Loane MA, Bloomer SE, Corbett R, et al. A randomized controlled trial to assess the clinical effectiveness of both realtime and store-and-forward teledermatology compared with conventional care. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2000;6 (suppl. 1):1-3
7. Taylor P. An assessment of the potential effect of a teledermatology system. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2000;6 (suppl. 1):74-6
8. Wootton R, Bloomer SE, Corbett R, et al. Multicentre randomised control trial comparing real time teledermatological with conventional outpatient dermatology care: societal cost-benefit analysis. British Medical Journal 2000;320:1252-6
9. Loane MA, Bloomer SE, Corbett R, et al. A randomized controlled trial assessing the health economics of realtime teledermatology compared with conventional care: an urban versus rural perspective. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2001;7:108-18
10. Whited JD. Teledermatology: current status and future directions. American Journal of Clinical Dermatology 2001;2:59-64
11. Eedy DJ, Wootton R. Teledermatology: a review. British Journal of Dermatology 2001;144:696-707
12. Pak HS. A teledermatology outcomes study: a prospective randomized evaluation. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health 2003;9 (suppl. 1):37
13. Krupinski EA, Webster P, Dolliver M, Weinstein RS, Lopez AM. Efficiency analysis of a multi-specialty telemedicine service. Telemedicine Journal 1999;5:265-71
14. Eberhardt MS, Ingram DD, Makuc DM, et al. Urban and Rural Health Chartbook. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2001