Density-functional based modeling of the intermediate in the water production reaction on Pt(111)

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 92, Issue 13, 2004, Pages

  Karlberg, G S ^a   Wahnstrom G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINDING ENERGY; CHEMICAL BONDS; DISSOCIATION; ELECTROCHEMISTRY; FLOW INTERACTIONS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PLATINUM; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; SCANNING TUNNELING MICROSCOPY; SINGLE CRYSTALS; WATER;

DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY (DFT); HIGH RESOLUTION ELECTRON ENERGY LOSS SPECTROSCOPY (HREELS); LOW TEMPERATURE REACTIONS; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROCESSES;

SURFACE CHEMISTRY;

EID: 2342544672     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.136103     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. M. A. Henderson, Surf. Sci. Rep. 46, 1 (2002).
2. N. M. Markovic and P. N. Ross, Jr., Surf. Sci. Rep. 45, 117 (2002).
3. K. Bedürftig et al., J. Chem. Phys. 111, 11147 (1999).
4. S. Völkening et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2672 (1999).
5. C. Sachs et al., Science 293, 1635 (2001); J. Chem. Phys. 116, 5759 (2002).
6. C. Sachs et al., Science 293, 1635 (2001); J. Chem. Phys. 116, 5759 (2002).
7. S. Raimondeau and D. G. Vlachos, Chem. Eng. Sci. 58, 657 (2003).
8. C. Stampfl et al., Phys. Rev. Lett 83, 2993 (1999).
9. A. Michaelides and P. Hu, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 513 (2001); J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 4235 (2001).
10. A. Michaelides and P. Hu, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 513 (2001); J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 4235 (2001).
11. A. P. Seitsonen et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 7347 (2001).
12. G. S. Karlberg et al., J. Chem. Phys. 119, 4865 (2003).
13. P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. 136, B864 (1964).
14. W. Kohn and L. Sham, Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965).
15. G. Kresse and J. Furthmuller, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996); Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15 (1996).
16. G. Kresse and J. Furthmuller, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996); Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15 (1996).
17. J. P. Perdew et al., Phys. Rev. B 46, 6671 (1992).
18. D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. B 41, 7892 (1990).
19. The corresponding k-point meshes were 6 × 6 × 1, 6 × 6 × 1, and 6 × 3 × 1, respectively.
20. N. Metropolis et al., J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1087 (1953).
21. S. Meng et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 176104 (2002).
22. H. Ogasawara et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 276102 (2002).