Relationships between tattling, likeability, and social classification: A preliminary investigation of adolescents in residential care

Behavior Modification

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 331-348

  Friman, Patrick C ^a,g,h   Woods, Douglas W ^b   Freeman, Kurt A ^c   Gilman, Rich ^d   Short, Mary ^e   McGrath, Ann M ^f   Handwerk, Michael L ^g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

^c OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^g Girls and Boys Town   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Peer reporting; Relational aggression; Residential care; Social rejection; Social skills; Tattling

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGGRESSION; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; BEHAVIOR; CAREGIVER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GROUP PSYCHOLOGY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; JUVENILE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERCEPTION; RATING SCALE; RESIDENTIAL CARE; SCHOOL CHILD; SOCIAL ADAPTATION; SOCIAL CLASS; SOCIAL ISOLATION; SOCIAL STATUS; SPEECH ARTICULATION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; CHILD; COOPERATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; PEER GROUP; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DISCLOSURE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PEER GROUP; RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; SOCIAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 2342529026     PISSN: 01454455     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0145445503258985     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Asher, S. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1986). Identifying children who are rejected by their peers. Developmental Psychology, 22, 444-449.
2. Beherman, R. E., Kliegman, R. M., & Arvin, A. M. (Eds.). (1996). Nelson textbook of pediatrics (15th ed.). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
3. Bornstein, M. H. (Ed.). (1995). Handbook of parenting (Vols. 1-4). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Bowers, F. E., McGinnis, J. C., Ervin, R. A., & Friman, P. C. (1999). Merging research and practice: The example of positive peer reporting applied to social rejection. Education and Treatment of Children, 22, 218-226.
5. Bowers, F. E., Woods, D. W., Carlyon, W. D., & Friman, P. C. (2000). Using positive peer reporting to improve the social interactions and acceptance of socially isolated adolescents in residential care: A systematic replication. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 239-242.
6. Coie, J. D., & Dodge, K. A. (1983). Continuities and changes in children's social status: A five year longitudinal study. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 29, 261-281.
7. Coie, J. D., & Dodge, K. A. (1988). Multiple sources of data on social behavior and social class. Child Development, 59, 815-829.
8. Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557-570.
9. Coughlin, D., & Shanahan, D. (1991). Boys Town Family Home Program training manual (3rd ed.). Boys Town, NE: Boys Town Press.
10. Daly, D. L., & Dowd, T. P. (1992). Characteristics of effective, harm-free environments for children in out-of-home care. Child Welfare, 71, 487-496.
11. Damon, W. (Ed.). (1998). Handbook of child psychology (5th ed., Vols. 1-4). New York: John Wiley.
12. den Bak-Lammers, I. M., & Ross, H. S. (1996). I'm telling! The content, context, and consequences of children's tattling on their siblings. Social Development, 5, 292-309.
13. Dishion, T. J., McCord, J., & Poulin, F. (1999). When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior. American Psychologist, 54, 755-764.
14. Dodge, K. (1983). Behavioral antecedents of peer social status. Child Development, 54, 1386-1399.
15. Dodge, K., Coie, J. D., Pettit, G. S., & Price, J. M. (1990). Peer status and aggression in boys groups: Developmental and contextual analyses. Child Development, 61, 1289-1309.
16. Dunn, J., & Munn, P. (1985). Becoming a family member: Family conflict and the development of social understanding in the second year. Child Development, 56, 480-492.
17. Ervin, R. A., Miller, P. M., & Friman, P. C. (1996). Feed the hungry bee: Using positive peer reports to improve the social interaction and acceptance of a socially rejected girl in residential care. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 251-253.
18. Franzoi, S. L., Davis, M. H., & Vasquez-Suson, K. A. (1994). Two social worlds: Social correlates and stability of adolescent status groups. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 67, 462-473.
19. Friman, P. C. (2000). Behavioral family style residential care for troubled out of home adolescents: Recent findings. In J. Austin and J. E. Carr (Eds.), Handbook of applied behavior analysis (pp. 187-210). Reno, NV: Context Press.
20. Grieger, T., Kauffman, J. M., & Grieger, R. M. (1976). Effects of peer reporting on cooperative play and aggression of kindergarten children. Journal of School Psychology, 14, 307-313.
21. Handwerk, M. L., Field, C., & Friman, P. C. (2000). The iatrogenic effects of group intervention for antisocial youth: Premature extrapolations? The Journal of Behavioral Education, 10, 223-228.
22. Jones, K. M., Young, M. M., & Friman, P. C. (2000). Increasing peer praise of socially rejected delinquent youth: Effects on cooperation and acceptance. School Psychology Quarterly, 15, 30-39.
23. Koch, H. L. (1933). Popularity in pre-school children: Some related factors and a technique for its measurement. Child Development, 4, 164-175.
24. Kupersmidt, J. B., Coie, J. D., & Dodge, K. (1990). The role of peer relationships in the development of disorder. In S. R. Asher & J. D. Coie (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood (pp. 274-308). New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Lancelotta, G. X., & Vaughn, S. (1989). Relation between types of aggression and sociometric status: Peer and teacher perceptions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 86-90.
26. Newcomb, A. F., & Bukowski, W. M. (1983). Social impact and social preference as determinants of children's peer group status. Developmental Psychology, 19, 856-867.
27. Newcomb, A. F., Bukowski, W. M., & Pattee, L. (1993). Children's peer relations: A metaanalytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 99-128.
28. Noshpitz, J. D. (Ed.). (1997). Handbook of child and adolescent psychiatry (Vols. 1-6). New York: John Wiley.
29. Parker, J. G., & Asher, S. R. (1987). Peer relations and later personal adjustment: Are low accepted children at risk? Psychological Bulletin, 102, 357-389.
30. Patterson, G. R., Reid, J. B., & Dishion, T. J. (1992). Antisocial boys. Eugene, OR: Castalia.
31. Ross, H. S., & den Bak-Lammers, I. M. (1998). Consistency and change in children's tattling on their siblings: Children's perspectives on the moral rules and procedures of family life. Social Development, 7, 275-300.
32. Short, M., Woods, D. W., Freeman, K. A., Friman, P. C., & Fuqua, W. (1999, April). Evaluation of the effects of positive peer reporting procedures on social status and interactions in socially rejected youth: Preliminary results. Paper presented at the annual convention for the Mid-West Association of Behavior Analysis and Therapy, Mankato, MN.
33. Terry, R., & Coie, J. D. (1991). A comparison of methods for defining sociometric status among children. Developmental Psychology, 27, 867-880.
34. Underwood, M. K., Kupersmidt, J. B., & Coie, J. D. (1996). Childhood peer status and aggression as predictors of adolescent childbearing. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 6, 201-223.
35. Walker, C. E., & Roberts, M. C. (1992). Handbook of clinical child psychology (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
36. Williams, M. (1989). You can curtail tattling. Learning 89, 17, 53.