![]() |
Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 272-273
|
Common Herbal Supplements Did Not Produce False-Positive Results on Urine Drug Screens Analyzed by Enzyme Immunoassay
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
AMPHETAMINE;
BARBITURIC ACID;
BENZODIAZEPINE;
CANNABINOID;
COCAINE;
CRANACTIN;
ELEUTHEROCOCCUS SENTICOSUS EXTRACT;
GARLIC EXTRACT;
GINKGO BILOBA EXTRACT;
HYPERICUM PERFORATUM EXTRACT;
KIRA;
PHENCYCLIDINE;
PLANT EXTRACT;
PROSTACTIVE;
SABAL EXTRACT;
VALERIAN;
CRANBERRY;
DIAGNOSTIC ERROR;
DRUG ABUSE;
DRUG SCREENING;
DRUG URINE LEVEL;
ELEUTHEROCOCCUS SENTICOSUS;
ENZYME IMMUNOASSAY;
FLUORESCENCE POLARIZATION IMMUNOASSAY;
GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY;
GINKGO BILOBA;
HERBAL MEDICINE;
HUMAN;
HYPERICUM PERFORATUM;
LETTER;
MASS SPECTROMETRY;
RADIOIMMUNOASSAY;
SABAL;
TEA;
VALERIANA OFFICINALIS;
ALLIUM SATIVUM;
ELEUTHEROCOCCUS;
ELEUTHEROCOCCUS SENTICOSUS;
GINKGO BILOBA;
HYPERICUM;
HYPERICUM PERFORATUM;
SABAL;
VACCINIUM MACROCARPON;
VALERIANA;
VALERIANA OFFICINALIS;
|
EID: 2342508442
PISSN: 01464760
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1093/jat/28.4.272 Document Type: Letter |
Times cited : (7)
|
References (7)
|