Monitoring nasal conductance by bilateral nasal cannula pressure transducers

Physiological Measurement

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 577-584

  Thurnheer, Robert ^a   Bloch, Konrad E ^b  

^a Cantonal Hospital of Münsterlingen   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Chronic rhinitis; Nasal airflow resistance; Non invasive monitoring; Physiological monitoring

Indexed keywords

AIRFLOW RESISTANCE; CHRONIC RHINITIS; CROSS-CORRELATIONS; NASAL AIRFLOW RESISTANCE; NASAL AIRFLOWS; NON-INVASIVE MONITORING; OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT; PHYSIOLOGICAL MONITORING; PRESSURE SWING; WELL BEING;

PATIENT MONITORING;

HISTAMINE; XYLOMETAZOLINE;

ADULT; AIRWAY CONDUCTANCE; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BREATHING; CANNULATION; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MONITORING; NASAL CONDUCTANCE; NASOPHARYNX; NORMAL HUMAN; PNEUMOTACHYGRAPHY; PRESSURE TRANSDUCER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC;

EID: 2342504602     PISSN: 09673334     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/25/2/014     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Clement P A 1984 Committee report on standardization of rhinomanometry Rhinology, 22 151-5
2. Cole P 1989 Stability of nasal airflow resistance Clin. Otolaryngol. 14 177-82
3. Cole P, Ayiomanimitis A and Ohki M 1989 Anterior and posterior rhinomanometry Rhinology 27 257-62
4. Cole P and Haight J S 1986 Posture and the nasal cycle Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 95 233-7
5. Eccles R 2000 Nasal airflow in health and disease Acta Otolaryngol 120 580-95
6. Fernandes F R, Sole D, Naspitz C and Munoz-Lopez F 1996 Diagnostic value of nasal provocation testing and rhinomanometry in allergic rhinitis J. Investig. Allergol. Clin. Immunol. 6 184-8
7. Hanley J A and McNeil B J 1982 The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve Radiology 143 29-36
8. Hilberg O, Jackson A C, Swift D L and Pedersen O F 1989 Acoustic rhinometry: evaluation of nasal cavity geometry by acoustic reflection J. Appl. Physiol. 66 295-303
9. Kirkness J P, Wheatley J R and Amis T C 2000 Nasal airflow dynamics: mechanisms and responses associated with an external nasal dilator strip Eur. Respir. J. 15 929-36
10. Lofaso F, Coste A, d'Ortho M P, Zerah-Lancner F, Delclaux C, Goldenberg F and Harf A 2000 Nasal obstruction as a risk factor for sleep apnoea syndrome Eur. Respir. J. 16 639-43
11. Montserrat J M, Farré R, Ballester E, Felez M A, Pastó M and Navajas D 1997 Evaluation of nasal prongs for estimating nasal airflow Am. J. Respir Crit. Care Med. 155 211-5
12. Perez W and Tobin M J 1985 Separation of factors responsible for changes in breathing pattern induced by instrumentation J. Appl. Physiol. 59 1515-20
13. Thurnheer R, Xie X and Bloch K E 2001 Accuracy of nasal cannula pressure recordings for assessment of ventilation during sleep Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 164 1914-9
14. Young T, Finn L and Kim H 1997 Nasal obstruction as a risk factor for sleep-disordered breathing The University of Wisconsin Sleep and Respiratory Research Group J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 99 S757-62
15. Young T, Finn L and Palta M 2001 Chronic nasal congestion at night is a risk factor for snoring in a population-based cohort study Arch. Intern. Med. 161 1514-9