Retailer- vs. Vendor-managed inventory and brand competition

Management Science

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 445-457

  Mishra, Birendra K ^a   Raghunathan, Srinivasan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Inventory management; Product substitution; Retailing; Supply chain management

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COSTS; DATA PROCESSING; DECISION MAKING; ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE; HEURISTIC METHODS; INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; INVENTORY CONTROL; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MONITORING; REAL TIME SYSTEMS;

INVENTORY MANAGEMENT; PRODUCT SUBSTITUTION; RETAILING; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; VENDOR-MANAGED INVENTORY (VMI);

INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT;

EID: 2342488080     PISSN: 00251909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0174     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Anupindi, R., Y. Bassok. 1999. Centralization of stocks: Retailers vs. manufacturer. Management Sci. 45 178-191.
2. Anupindi, R., Y. Bassok, E. Zemel. 1999. Study of decentralized distribution systems: Part I - A general framework. Working paper, Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
3. Bassok, Y., R. Anupindi, R. Akella. 1999. Single period multi-product inventory models with substitution. Oper. Res. 4 632-642.
4. Bitran, G., S. Dasu. 1992. Ordering policies in an environment of stochastic yields and substitutable demand. Oper. Res. 50 999-1017.
5. Bourland, K., S. Powell, D. Pyke. 1996. Exploring timely demand information to reduce inventories. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 92 239-253.
6. Butz, D. 1997. Vertical price controls with uncertain demand. J. Law Econom. 35 433-459.
7. Cachon, G., M. Fisher. 2000. Supply chain inventory management and the value of shared information. Management Sci. 46 1032-1048.
8. Chen, F. 1998. Echelon reorder points, installation reorder points, and value of centralized demand information. Management Sci. 44 221-234.
9. Drezner, Z., J. K. Ryan, D. Simchi-Levi. 2000. Quantifying the bullwhip effect in a simple supply chain: The impact of forecasting, lead times, and information. Management Sci. 46 436-443.
10. Gallego, G., Y. Huang, K. Katircioglu, Y. T. Leung. 2000. When to share demand information in a simple supply chain. Working paper, Columbia University, New York.
11. Gavirneni, S., R. Kapuscinski, S. Tayur. 1999. Value of information in capacitated supply chains. Management Sci. 45 16-24.
12. Heyman, D. P., M. J. Sobel. 1984. Stochastic Models in Operations Research, Vol. 11: Stochastic Optimization. McGraw-Hill, New York.
13. Hsu, A., Y. Bassok. 1999. Multiproduct inventory problem with substitution and random yield. Oper. Res. 47 277-290.
14. Kandel, E. 1996. The right to return. J. Law Econom. 29 329-356.
15. Lee, H. L., P. Padmanabhan, S. Whang. 1997. Distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Sci. 43 546-558.
16. Lee, H. L., K. C. So, C. S. Tang. 2000a. The value of information sharing in a two-level supply chain. Management Sci. 46 626-643.
17. Lee, H. L., V. Padmanabhan, T. A. Taylor, S. Whang. 2000b. Price protection in the personal computer industry. Management Sci. 46(4) 467-482.
18. Lippman, S. A., K. F. McCardle. 1997. The competitive newsboy. Oper. Res. 45 54-65.
19. Mahajan, S., G. van Ryzin. 2001. Stocking retail assortments under dynamic consumer substitution. Oper. Res. 49 334-351.
20. McGillivray, A., E. Silver. 1978. Some concepts for inventory control under substitutable demand. INFOR 16 47-63.
21. Moorthy, K. 1987. Managing channel profits: Comment. Marketing Sci. 6 375-379.
22. Narayanan, V. G., A. Raman. 2000. Assignment of stocking decision rights under incomplete contracting. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
23. Netessine, S., N. Rudi, Y. Wang. 2001. Dynamic inventory competition and customer retention. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
24. Padmanabhan, V., I. P. L. Png. 1997. Manufacturer's return policies and retail competition, Marketing Sci. 16 81-94.
25. Parlar, M. 1988. Game theoretic analysis of the substitutable product inventory problem with random demands. Naval Res. Logist. 35 397-409.
26. Parlar, M., S. Goyal. 1984. Optimal ordering decisions for two substitutable products with stochastic demand. OPSEARCH 21 1-15.
27. Pasternack, B. A. 1985. Optimal pricing and return policies for perishable commodities. Marketing Sci. 4 166-176.
28. Pasternack, B., Z. Drezner. 1991. Optimal inventory policies for two substitutable commodities with stochastic demand. Naval Res. Logist. 38 221-240.
29. Pentico, D. 1974. The assortment problem with stochastic demand. Management Sci. 21 268-290.
30. Petruzzi, N., M. Dada. 1999. Pricing and the newsvendor problem: A review with extensions. Oper. Res. 47(2) 183-194.
31. Raghunathan, S. 2001. Information sharing in a supply chain: A note on its value when demand is non-stationary. Management Sci. 47(4) 605-610.
32. Raghunathan, S., A. Yeh. 2001. Beyond EDI: Impact of continuous replenishment program (CRP) networks between a manufacturer and its retailers. Inform. Systems Res. 12(4) 406-419.
33. Rajaram, K., C. Tang. 2000. The impact of product substitution on retail merchandising. Working paper, Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
34. Rao, U., J. Swaminathan, J. Zhang. 1998. Managing multi-product inventory systems with setup costs using downward conversion. Working paper, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
35. Rudi, N., S. Netessine. 1999. Demand substitution in retail: Centralization and competition. Working paper, Simon School of Business Administration, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
36. Smith, S. A., N. Aggrawal. 2000. Management of multi-item retail inventory systems with demand substitution. Oper. Res. 4(8) 50-64.