Optimisation of the fatigue resistance of 2024-T351 aluminium alloys by controlled shot peening - Methodology, results and analysis

International Journal of Fatigue

Volumn 26, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 849-856

  Rodopoulos, C A ^a   Curtis, S A ^b   De Los Rios, E R ^b   SolisRomero, J ^c  

^a SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^c Inst Technologico de Tlalnepantla   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Controlled shot peening; Fatigue life; Residual stresses; Surface roughness

Indexed keywords

CRACK PROPAGATION; CRACKS; CYCLIC LOADS; DATABASE SYSTEMS; FATIGUE OF MATERIALS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MODULATORS; PLASTIC DEFORMATION; RESIDUAL STRESSES; SHOT PEENING; SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

CONTROLLED SHOT PEENING (CSP); GRAIN ORIENTATION; HIGH CYCLE FATIGUE; STRESS MODULATORS;

ALUMINUM ALLOYS;

EID: 2342481721     PISSN: 01421123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Miller K.J. Materials science perspective of metals fatigue resistance. Mater Sci Technol. 9:1993;453-462.
2. Dörr T, Hilpert M, Beckmerhagen P, Kiefer A, Wagner L. Influence of shot peening on fatigue performance of high strength aluminium and magnesium alloys. In: 7th International Conference on Shot Peening, Warsaw, 1999. p. 153-60.
3. Martin U., Altenberger I., Scholtes B., Kremmer K., Oettel H. Cyclic deformation and near surface microstrutures of normalised shot peened steel SAE 1045. Mater Sci Engng A. 246:1998;69-80.
4. Romero Solis J, de los Rios ER, Fam HY, Levers A. Optimisation of the shot peening process in terms of fatigue resistance. In: 7th International Conference on Shot Peening, Warsaw, 1999. p. 117-26.
5. Jaensson B. The influence of the fatigue strength of aluminium alloy parts of the relationship between the surface residual stress state and the load induces stress state. In: 1st International Conference on Shot Peening, Paris, 1981. p. 435-44.
6. de los Rios E.R., Trull M., Levers A. Modelling fatigue crack growth in shot peened components of 2024-T351. Fatigue Fract Engng Mater Struct. 23:2000;709-716.
7. Ohji K., Kubo S., Tsuji M., Ogawa H., Sakurai K. Methods of predicting fatigue crack growth lives in residual stress fields. Trans JSME. 53:(492):1992;1516-1524.
8. Eckersley JS. Shot peening process controls ensure repeatable results. In: 2nd International Conference on Shot Peening, Chicago, 1984.
9. Sharp P.K., Clayton J.Q., Clark G. The fatigue resistance of peened 7075-T7451 aluminium alloy: repair and re-treatment of the component surface. Fatigue Fract Engng Mater Struct. 19:1994;243-252.
10. Boyer H.E., Gail T.L. Metals handbook. 9th ed :1997;American Society of Metals, Metals Park, OH.
11. Callister W.D. Jr. Materials science and engineering - an introduction. 2nd ed :1991;Wiley, USA.
12. Airbus Industrie Test Method, (AITM 1-0011) Constant amplitude fatigue testing of metallic materials, AIRBUS INDUSTRIE, Editor. Airbus Industrie, Engineering Directorate, Blagnac cedex, France, 1996. p. 1-24.
13. Romero Solis J. Optimisation of the shot peening process in terms of fatigue resistance. PhD Thesis, The University of Sheffield, 2002.
14. Fisher R.A. The design of experiments. 9th ed :1974;Hafner, New York.
15. Kackar R.N. Off-line quality control, parameter design and the tagushi method. J Quality Technol. 17:(4):1985;176-188.
16. Baragetti S. Shot peening optimisation by means of DOE: Numerical simulation and choice of treatment parameters. Int J Mater Prod Technol. 12:1997;83-109.
17. Curtis S., de los Rios E.R., Rodopoulos C.A., Levers A. Analysis of the effects of controlled shot peening on fatigue damage of high strength aluminium alloys. Int J Fatigue. 25:2003;59-66.
18. Li J.K., Yao M., Wang D., Wang R. An analysis of stress concentrations caused by shot peening and its application in predicting fatigue strength. Fatigue Fract Engng Mat Struct. 15:(12):1992;1271-1279.
19. Vallellano C., Navarro A., Domínguez J. Fatigue crack growth threshold conditions at notches. Part I: Theory. Fatigue Fract Engng Mater Struct. 23:2000;113-121.
20. Navarro A., de los Rios E.R. Fatigue crack growth modelling by successive blocking of dislocations. Proc Royal Soc London. A437:1992;375-390.
21. Curtis S.A., Romero Solis J., de los Rios E.R., Rodopoulos C.A., Levers A. Predicting the interfaces between fatigue crack growth regimes in 7150-T651 aluminium alloy using the fatigue damage map. Mater Sci Engng. A344:2003;79-85.
22. E837-95, ASTM. Standard test method for determining residual stresses by the hole-drilling strain-gage method. Annual book of ASTM standards, Vol. 03.01. Philadelphia: ASTM; 1985. p. 642-8.
23. de los Rios ER, Trooll M, Levers A. Improving the fatigue crack resistance of 2024-T351 aluminium alloy by shot peening. In: Proc On Life Extensions/Technology-Opportunities, London, 1999. p. 261-8.
24. Rodopoulos C.A., Romero J.S., Curtis S.A., de los Rios E.R., Peyre P. Effect of controlled shot peening and laser shock peening on the fatigue performance of 2024-T351 aluminium alloy. J Mater Engng Perform. 12:(4):2003;414-419.