A repeated measures approach for simultaneous modeling of multiple neurobehavioral outcomes in newborns exposed to cocaine in utero

American Journal of Epidemiology

Volumn 159, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 891-899

  Das, Abhik ^a   Poole, W Kenneth ^a   Bada, Henrietta S ^b  

^a RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Binary data; Generalized estimating equation; Generalized linear mixed model; Multiple comparisons; Repeated measures; Simultaneous inference; Syndrome

Indexed keywords

DRUG USER; PREGNANCY;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; AUTONOMIC DYSFUNCTION; CALCULATION; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DISEASE; CLINICAL FEATURE; COCAINE DEPENDENCE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HUMAN; LIFESTYLE; MATERNAL BEHAVIOR; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRENATAL EXPOSURE; REPEATED MEASURES APPROACH; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; SYMPTOM; SYNDROME; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CHEMICALLY INDUCED DISORDER; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; NEWBORN; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREVALENCE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK FACTOR; UNITED STATES; VALIDATION STUDY; WITHDRAWAL SYNDROME;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COCAINE-RELATED DISORDERS; DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEONATAL ABSTINENCE SYNDROME; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRENATAL EXPOSURE DELAYED EFFECTS; PREVALENCE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK FACTORS; SYNDROME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 2342472729     PISSN: 00029262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwh114     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. McCullagh P, Nelder J. Generalized linear models. London, United Kingdom: Chapman and Hall, 1989.
2. Stewart AL, Ware JE. Measuring functioning and well-being: the Medical Outcomes Study approach. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1992.
3. Bandeen-Roche K, Miglioretti DL, Zeger SL, et al. Latent variable regression for multiple outcomes. J Am Stat Assoc 1997; 92:1375-86.
4. Liang KY, Zeger SL. Regression analysis for correlated data. Annu Rev Public Health 1993;14:43-68.
5. Fitzmaurice GM, Laird NM, Zahner GE, et al. Bivariate logistic regression analysis of childhood psychopathology ratings using multiple informants. Am J Epidemiol 1995;142:1194-203.
6. Bauer CR, Shankaran S, Bada HS, et al. The Maternal Lifestyle Study: drug exposure during pregnancy and short-term maternal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:487-95.
7. Bada H, Bauer CR, Shankaran S, et al. Central and autonomic nervous systems (CNS/ANS) signs associated with in-utero cocaine/opiate exposure. Arch Dis Child 2002;87:106-12.
8. Rosen TS, Pippenger CE. Pharmacologic observations on the neonatal withdrawal syndrome. J Pediatr 1976;88:1044-8.
9. Zelson C, Rubio E, Wasserman E. Prenatal narcotic addiction 10 year observation. Pediatrics 1971;48:178-89.
10. Napiorkowski B, Lester BM, Freier C, et al. Effects of in utero substance exposure on infant neurobehavior. Pediatrics 1996; 98:71-5.
11. Oro AS, Dixon SD. Perinatal cocaine and methamphetamine exposure: maternal and neonatal correlates. J Pediatr 1987;111: 571-8.
12. Roberts RJ. Fetal and infant intoxication. In: Drug therapy in infants: pharmacologic principles and clinical experience. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 1984:322-83.
13. Neuhaus JM. Statistical methods for longitudinal and clustered designs with binary responses. Stat Methods Med Res 1992;1: 249-73.
14. Legler J, Lefkopoulou M, Ryan L. Efficiency and power of tests for multiple binary outcomes. J Am Stat Assoc 1995;90: 680-93.
15. Liang KY, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 1986;73:13-22.
16. Breslow NE, Clayton DG. Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. J Am Stat Assoc 1993;88:9-25.
17. Stiratelli R, Laird N, Ware JH. Random effects models for serial observations with binary response. Biometrics 1984;40: 961-71.
18. Hardin JW, Hilbe JM. Generalized estimating equations. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2003.
19. Horton NJ, Lipsitz SR. Review of software to fit generalized estimating equation (GEE) regression models. Am Stat 1999; 53:160-9.
20. Lipsitz SR, Laird NM, Harrington DP. Generalized estimating equations for correlated binary data: using the odds ratio as a measure of association. Biometrika 1991;78:153-60.
21. Zhou XZ, Perkins AJ, Hui SL. Comparisons of software packages for generalized linear multilevel models. Am Stat 1999; 53:282-90.
22. Brown H, Prescott R. Applied mixed models in medicine. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, 1999.
23. Diggle PJ, Liang KY, Zeger SL. Analysis of longitudinal data. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1994.
24. Carey V, Zeger SL, Diggle P. Modelling multivariate binary data with alternating logistic regressions. Biometrika 1993;80: 517-26.
25. Neuhaus JM, Kalbfleisch JD, Hauck WW. A comparison of cluster-specific and population-averaged approaches for analyzing correlated binary data. Int Stat Rev 1991;59:25-35.