"Mind the gap": The size-distance dissociation in visual neglect is a cueing effect

Cortex

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 339-346

  McIntosh, Robert D ^a,b   McClements, Kevin I ^a   Dijkerman, H Chris ^c   Milner, A David ^a  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^c UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Line bisection; Neglect; Visual attention

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL OBSERVATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; ERROR; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; RELIABILITY; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL DEPRIVATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 2342472598     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70129-1     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bisiach E, Capitani E, Colombo A and Spinnler H. Halving a horizontal segment: A study on hemisphere-damaged patients with cerebral focal lesions. Archives Suisses de Neurologie, Neurochirurgie et de Psychiatrie, 118: 199-206, 1976.
2. Bisiach E, Geminiani G, Berti A and Rusconi ML. Perceptual and premotor factors in unilateral neglect. Neurology, 40: 1278-1281, 1990.
3. Bisiach E, Pizzamiglio L, Nico D and Antonucci G. Beyond unilateral neglect. Brain, 119: 851-857, 1996.
4. Bisiach E, Ricci R, Lualdi M and Colombo MR. Perceptual and response bias in unilateral neglect: Two modified versions of the Milner landmark task. Brain and Cognition, 37: 369-386, 1998.
5. Bisiach E, Rusconi ML, Peretti VA and Vallar G. Challenging current accounts of unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia, 32: 1431-1434, 1994.
6. Coslett HB, Bowers D, Fitzpatrick E, Haws B and Heilman KM. Directional hypokinesia and hemispatial inattention in neglect. Brain, 113: 475-486, 1990.
7. Critchley M. The Parietal Lobes. London: E. Arnold and Co., 1953.
8. Duncan, J. Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113: 501-517, 1997.
9. Fink GR, Dolan RJ, Halligan PW, Marshall JC and Frith CD. Space-based and object-based visual attention: Shared and specific neural domains. Brain, 120: 2013-2028, 1997.
10. Gainotti G, Messerli P and Tissot R. Qualitative analysis of spatial neglect in relation to laterality of cerebral lesions. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 35: 545-550, 1972.
11. Halligan PW and Marshall JC. Left visuo-spatial neglect: A meaningless entity? Cortex, 28: 525-535, 1992.
12. Harvey M, Milner AD and Roberts RC. An investigation of hemispatial neglect using the landmark task. Brain and Cognition, 27: 59-78, 1995.
13. Heilman KM and Valenstein E. Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect. Annals of Neurology, 5: 166-170, 1979.
14. Heilman KM and Watson RT. Mechanisms underlying the unilateral neglect syndrome. In EA Weinstein and RP Friedland (Eds), Hemi-inattention and hemisphere specialization. Advances in Neurology, Vol. 18. New York: Raven Press, 1977, pp. 93-107.
15. Humphreys GW. Neural representation of objects in space: A dual coding account. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 353: 1341-1351, 1998.
16. Humphreys GW and Heinke D. Spatial representation and selection in the brain: Neuropsychological and computational constraints. Visual Cognition, 5: 9-47, 1998.
17. Humphreys GW and Riddoch MJ. Attention to within-object and between-object spatial representations: Multiple sites for visual selection. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11: 207-242, 1994.
18. Humphreys GW and Riddoch MJ. Separate coding of space within and between perceptual objects: Evidence from unilateral visual neglect. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12: 283-311, 1995.
19. Irving-Bell L, Small M and Cowey A. A distortion of perceived space in patients with right-hemisphere lesions and visual hemineglect. Neuropsychologia, 37: 919-925, 1999.
20. Karnath H-O and Ferber S. Is space representation distorted in neglect? Neuropsychologia, 37: 7-15, 1999.
21. Kerkhoff G. Multiple perceptual distortions and their modulation in leftsided visual neglect. Neuropsychologia, 38: 1073-1086, 2000.
22. Kerkhoff G, Schindler I, Keller I and Marquardt C. Visual background motion reduces size distortion in spatial neglect. Neuroreport, 10: 319-323, 1999.
23. Marshall JC and Halligan PW. Within- and between-task dissociations in visuo-spatial neglect: A case study. Cortex, 31: 367-376, 1995.
24. Mattingley JB, Pierson JM, Bradshaw JL, Phillips JG and Bradshaw JA. To see or not to see - the effects of visible and invisible cues on line bisection judgements in unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia, 31: 1201-1215, 1993.
25. Milner AD and Harvey M. Distortion of size perception in visuospatial neglect. Current Biology, 5: 85-89, 1995.
26. Milner AD, Harvey M and Pritchard CL. Visual size processing in spatial neglect. Experimental Brain Research, 123: 192-200, 1998.
27. Nichelli P, Rinaldi M and Cubelli R. Selective spatial attention and length representation in normal subjects and in patients with unilateral spatial neglect. Brain and Cognition, 9: 57-70, 1989.
28. Reuter-Lorenz PA and Posner MI. Components of neglect from right-hemisphere damage - an analysis of line bisection. Neuropsychologia, 28: 327-333, 1990.
29. Riddoch MJ and Humphreys GW. The effect of cueing on unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia, 21: 589-599, 1983.
30. Riddoch MJ, Humphreys GW, Luckhurst L, Burroughs E and Bateman A. Paradoxical neglect - spatial representations, hemisphere-specific activation, and spatial cueing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12: 569-604, 1995.
31. Wilson B, Cockburn J and Halligan P. Behavioural Inattention Test. Titchfield, Hampshire: Thames Valley Test Co., 1987.