Analysis of factors influencing pregnancy rates in homologous intrauterine insemination

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 81, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 1308-1313

  Ibérico, Gilberto ^a   Vioque, Jesús ^b   Ariza, Nuria ^a   Lozano, Jose Manuel ^a   Roca, Manuela ^a   Llácer, Joaquín ^a   Bernabeu, Rafael ^a  

^a Instituto Bernabeu   (Spain)

^b MIGUEL HERNÁNDEZ UNIVERSITY   (Spain)

Author keywords

Homologous intrauterine insemination; human menopausal gonadotropin; motile spermatozoa count; pregnancy rate; prognostic factors

Indexed keywords

CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN; HUMAN MENOPAUSAL GONADOTROPIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DOSE RESPONSE; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFERTILITY; INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MATERNAL AGE; MULTIPLE PREGNANCY; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; OVARY FOLLICLE CELL; PREGNANCY RATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPERMATOZOON; SPERMATOZOON COUNT; SPONTANEOUS ABORTION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COUNSELING; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INSEMINATION, ARTIFICIAL, HOMOLOGOUS; MALE; MATERNAL AGE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 2342471963     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.09.062     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Zayed F., Lenton E.A., Cooke I.D. Comparison between stimulated in vitro fertilization and stimulated intrauterine insemination for the treatment of unexplained and mild male factor infertility. Hum Reprod. 12:1997;2408-2413
2. Melis G.B., Paoletti A.M., Ajossa S., Guerriero S., Depau G.F., Mais V. Ovulation induction with gonadotropins as sole treatment in infertile couples with open tubes a randomized prospective comparison between intrauterine insemination and timed vaginal intercourse. Fertil Steril. 64:1995;1088-1093
3. Zeyneloglu H.B., Arici A., Olive D.L., Duleba A.J. Comparison of intrauterine insemination with timed intercourse in superovulated cycles with gonadotropins a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 69:1998;486-491
4. Carroll N., Palmer J.R. A comparison of intrauterine versus intracervical insemination in fertile single women. Fertil Steril. 75:2001;656-660
5. Hughes E.G. The effectiveness of ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of persistent infertility a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 12:1997;1865-1872
6. Guzick D.S., Sullivan M.W., Adamson G.D., Cedars M.I., Falk R.J., Peterson E.P., et al. Efficacy of treatment for unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril. 70:1998;207-213
7. Van Wely M, Westergaard LG, Bossuyt PMM, Van der Veen F. Human menopausal gonadotropin versus recombinant follicle stimulation hormone for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive cycles (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library 2003;2. Oxford: Update Software
8. Tomlinson M.J., Amissah-Arthur J.B., Thompson K.A., Kasraie J.L., Bentick B. Prognostic indicators for intrauterine insemination (IUI) statistical model for IUI success. Hum Reprod. 11:1996;1892-1896
9. Stone B.A., Vargyas J.M., Ringler G.E., Stein A.L., Marrs R.P. Determinants of outcome of intrauterine insemination analysis of outcomes of 9, 963 consecutive cycles. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 180:1999;1522-1534
10. Khalil M.R., Rasmussen P.E., Erg K., Larsen S.B., Rex S., Westergaard L.G. Homologous intrauterine insemination. An evaluation of prognostic factors based on a review of 2473 cycles. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 80:2001;74-81
11. Van Voorhis B.J., Barnett M., Sparks A.E., Syrop C.H., Rosenthal G., Dawson J. Effect of total motile sperm count on the efficacy and cost effectiveness of intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 75:2001;661-668
12. Nuojua-Huttunen S., Tomas C., Bloigu R., Tuomivaara L., Martikainen H. Intrauterine insemination treatment in subfertility an analysis of factors affecting outcome. Hum Reprod. 14:1999;698-703
13. Frederick J.L., Denker M.S., Rojas A., Horta I., Stone S.C., Asch R.H., et al. Is there a role for ovarian stimulation and intra-uterine insemination after age 40? Hum Reprod. 9:1994;2284-2296
14. van der Westerlaken L.A., Naaktgeboren N., Helmerhorst F.M. Evaluation of pregnancy rates after intrauterine insemination according to indication, age, and sperm parameters. J Assist Reprod Genet. 15:1998;359-364
15. Cohlen B.J., te Velde E.R., van Kooij R.J., Looman C.W., Habbema J.D. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for treating male subfertility a controlled study. Hum Reprod. 13:1998;1553-1558
16. Ransom M.X., Blotner M.B., Boher M., Corsan G., Kemmann E. Does increasing frequency of intrauterine insemination improve pregnancy rates significantly during superovulation cycles? Fertil Steril. 61:1994;303-307
17. STATA Statistical Software. STATA/SE 7.0 for Windows. College Station, TX: STATA Corporation, 2002
18. Dickey R.P., Taylor S.N., Lu P.Y., Sartor B.M., Rye P.H., Pyrzak R. Relationship of follicle numbers and estradiol levels to multiple implantation in 3608 intrauterine insemination cycles. Fertil Steril. 75:2001;69-77
19. Fukuda M., Fukuda K., Andersen C.Y., Byskov A.G. Right-sided ovulation favours pregnancy more than left-sided ovulation. Hum Reprod. 15:2000;1921-1926
20. Miller D.C., Hollenbeck B.K., Smith G.D., Randolph J.F., Christman G.M., Smith Y.R., et al. Processed total motile sperm count correlates with pregnancy outcome after intrauterine insemination. Urology. 60:2002;497-501
21. Sahakyan M., Harlow B.L., Hornstein M.D. Influence of age, diagnosis and cycle number on pregnancy rates with gonadotropin-induced controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril. 72:1999;500-504
22. Dickey R.P., Taylor S.N., Lu P.Y., Sartor B.M., Rye P.H., Pyrzak R. Effect of diagnosis, age, sperm quality and number of preovulatory follicle on the outcome of multiple cycles of clomiphene citrate-intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril. 78:2002;1088-1095
23. Yang JH, Wu MY, Chao KH, Chen SU, Ho HN, Yang YS. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination in subfertility. How many treatment cycles are sufficient? J Reprod Med 1998;43:903-8
24. Gleicher N., Oleske D.M., Tur-Kaspa I., Vidali A., Karande V. Reducing the risk of high-order multiple pregnancy after ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins. N Engl J Med. 343:2000;2-7
25. Mathieu C., Ecochard R., Bied V., Lornage J., Czyba J.C. Cumulative conception rate following intrauterine artificial insemination with husband's spermatozoa influence of husband's age. Hum Reprod. 10:1995;1090-1097
26. Haebe J., Martin J., Tekepety F., Tummon I., Shepherd K. Success of intrauterine insemination in women aged 40-42 years. Fertil Steril. 78:2002;29-33
27. Cantineau AEP, Heineman MJ, Cohlen BJ. Single versus double intrauterine insemination (IUI) in stimulated cycles for subfertile couples (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library 2003;1. Oxford: Update Software
28. Miskry T., Chapman M. The use of intrauterine insemination in Australia and New Zealand. Hum Reprod. 17:2002;956-959