Attractiveness, distinctiveness, and recognition of faces: Attractive faces can be typical or distinctive but are not better recognized

American Journal of Psychology

Volumn 116, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 455-468

  Wickham, Lee H V ^a   Morris, Peter E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2342471344     PISSN: 00029556     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1423503     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Alley, T. R. (1988). Social and applied aspects of perceiving faces. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Alley, T. R., & Cunningham, M. R. (1991). Average faces are attractive, but very attractive faces are not average. Psychological Science, 2, 123-125.
3. Berry, D. S., & McArthur, L. Z. (1985). Some components and consequences of a baby-face. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 312-323.
4. Brigham, J. C. (1990). Target person distinctiveness and attractiveness as moderator variables in the confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identifications. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 11, 101-115.
5. Cross, J. F., Cross, J., & Daly, J. (1971). Sex, race, age and beauty as factors in recognition of faces. Perception & Psychophysics, 10, 393-396.
6. Cunningham, M. R. (1986). Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: Quasiexperiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty. Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 50, 925-935.
7. Cunningham, M. R., Barbee, A. P., & Pike, C. L. (1990). What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 61-72.
8. Cutler, B. L., & Penrod, S. D. (1989). Moderators of the confidence-accuracy correlation in face recognition: The role of information processing and base-rates. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 3, 95-107.
9. Downs, A. C. (1990). Physical attractiveness, sex-typed characteristics, and gender: Are beauty and masculinity linked? Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71, 451-458.
10. Downs, A. C., & Walz, P. J. (1981). Sex differences in preschoolers' perceptions of young, middle aged, and elderly adults. The Journal of Psychology, 109, 119-122.
11. Fleishman, J. J., Buckley, M. L., Klosinsky, M. J., Smith, N., & Tuck, B. (1976). Judged attractiveness in recognition memory of women's faces. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 43, 709-710.
12. Howell, D. C. (1997). Statistical methods for psychology (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.
13. Langlois, J. H., & Roggman, L. A. (1990). Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science, 1, 115-121.
14. Light, L. L., Hollander, S., & Kayra-Stuart, F. (1981). Why attractive people are harder to remember. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 269-276.
15. Light, L. L., Kayra-Stuart, F., & Hollander, S. (1979). Recognition memory for typical and unusual faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 212-228.
16. McLellan, B., & McKelvie, S. J. (1993). Effects of age, and gender on perceived physical attractiveness. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 25, 135-142.
17. Morris, P. E., & Wickham, L. H. V. (2001). Typicality and face recognition: A critical re-evaluation of the two-factor theory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 863-877.
18. Mueller, J. H., Heesacker, M., & Ross, M. J. (1984). Likability of targets and distractors in facial recognition. American Journal of Psychology, 97(2), 235-247.
19. O'Toole, A. J., Vetter, T., Volz, H., & Salter, E. M. (1997). Three-dimensional caricatures of human heads: Distinctiveness and the perception of facial age. Perception, 26, 719-732.
20. Perrett, D. I., May, K. A., & Yoshikawa, S. (1994). Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness. Nature, 368, 239-242.
21. Sarno, J. A., & Alley, T. R. (1997). Attractiveness and the memorability of faces: Only a matter of distinctiveness? American Journal of Psychology, 110(1), 81-92.
22. Shepherd, J. W., & Ellis, H. D. (1973). The effect of attractiveness on recognition memory for faces. American Journal of Psychology, 86(4), 627-633.
23. Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1993). Human facial beauty. Human Nature, 4, 237-269.
24. Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 161-204.
25. Valentine, T., & Bruce, V. (1986a). The effects of distinctiveness in recognising and classifying faces. Perception, 15, 525-535.
26. Valentine, T., & Bruce, V. (1986b). Recognizing familiar faces: The role of distinctiveness and familiarity. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 40, 300-305.
27. Vokey, J. R., & Read, J. D. (1992). Familiarity, memorability, and the effect of typicality on the recognition of faces. Memory & Cognition, 20, 291-302.
28. Vokey, J. R., & Read, J. D. (1995). Memorability, familiarity, and categorical structure in the recognition of faces. In T. Valentine (Ed.), Cognitive and computational aspects of face recognition: Explorations in face-space (pp. 113-137). London: Routledge.
29. Wernick, M., & Manaster, G. J. (1984). Age and perception of age and attractiveness. The Gerontologist, 24, 408-414.
30. Wickham, L. H. V. (1999). Attractiveness and distinctiveness of the human face. Unpublished PhD thesis, Lancaster University.
31. Wickham, L. H. V., Morris, P. E., & Fritz, C. O. (2000). Facial distinctiveness: Its measurement, distribution and influence on immediate and delayed recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 99-124.
32. Yarmey, A. D. (1979). The psychology of eyewitness testimony. New York: The Free Press.