Utility of digital photographs of the hand for assessing the presence of hand osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 360-365

  Stern, Alan G ^a,e   Moxley, G ^b   Sudha Rao, T P ^b   Disler, D ^b   McDowell, C ^c   Park, M ^d   Schumacher, H R ^a  

^a HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e Emkey Arthritis and Osteoporosis   (United States)

Author keywords

Genetics; Hand; Osteoarthritis; Photograph

Indexed keywords

INTERLEUKIN 1;

ARTICLE; CARPOMETACARPAL JOINT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC CODE; HAND DISEASE; HAND RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERPHALANGEAL JOINT; LYMPH NODE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROXIMAL INTERPHALANGEAL JOINT; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; RHEUMATOLOGY; SCREENING TEST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 2342469983     PISSN: 10634584     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2004.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Badley EM. The effect of osteoarthritis on disability and health care use in Canada. J Rheumatol Suppl 1995; 43:19-22.
2. Stecher RM, Hersh AH. Heberden's Nodes: The mechanism of inheritance in hypertrophic arthritis of the fingers. J Clin Invest 1944;23:699-704.
3. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS, Bier F. Genetic factors in generalized osteoarthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 1963; 22:237-55.
4. MacGregor AJ, Bamber S, Silman AJ. A comparison of the performance of different methods of disease classification for rheumatoid arthritis. Results of an analysis from a nationwide twin study. J Rheumatol 1994;21:1420-6.
5. Lawrence JS, Bremner JM, Bier F. Osteo-arthrosis. Prevalence in the population and relationship between symptoms and x-ray changes. Ann Rheum Dis 1966;25(1):1-24.
6. O'Reilly S, Johnson S, Doherty S, Muir K., Doherty M. Screening for hand osteoarthritis (OA) using a postal survey. Osteoarthritis Cart 1999;7(5):461-5.
7. Acheson RM, Collart AB, Greenberg RH, Clemett AR. New Haven survey of joint disease. Photographs and other variables in screening for arthritis of the hands. Am J Epidemiol 1969;90(3):224-35.
8. Hirsch R, Guralnik JM, Ling SM, Fried LP, Hochberg MC. The patterns and prevalence of hand osteoarthritis in a population of disabled older women: The Women's Health and Aging Study. Osteoarthritis Cart 2000;8(Suppl A):S16-S21.
9. Altman R, Alarcon G, Appelrouth D, Bloch D, Borenstein D, Brandt K, et al. The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hand. Arthritis Rheum 1990;33(11):1601-10.
10. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Epidemiology of Chronic Rheumatism. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, 1963.
11. Hart DJ, Spector TD, Brown P, Wilson P, Doyle DV, Silman AJ. Clinical signs of early osteoarthritis: reproducibility and relation to x ray changes in 541 women in the general population. Ann Rheum Dis 1991;50(7):467-70.
12. Bellamy N, Klestov A, Muirden K, Kuhnert P, Do KA, O'Gorman L, et al. Perceptual variation in categorizing individuals according to American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for hand, knee, and hip osteoarthritis (OA): observations based on an Australian Twin Registry study of OA. J Rheumatol 1999;26(12):2654-4658.
13. Bellamy N, Tesar P, Walker D, Klestov A, Muirden K, Kuhnert P, et al. Perceptual variation in grading hand, hip and knee radiographs: observations based on an Australian twin registry study of osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1999;58(12):766-9.