Editorial 2. Ethics again - Hoops, loops and principles

Anaesthesia

Volumn 59, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 316-317

  Yentis, S M ^a  

^a CHELSEA AND WESTMINSTER HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIA; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONFIDENTIALITY; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL CARE; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PATIENT CARE; PUBLICATION; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; ETHICS; NOTE; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH ETHICS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

ANESTHESIA; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMANS; PERIODICALS; PUBLISHING; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 2342451318     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03749.x     Document Type: Editorial

References (7)

1. Sneyd JR. Ethics and research in anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 1998; 53: 422-3.
2. Asai T, Shingu K. Ethical considerations in anaesthesia Journals. Anaesthesia 1999; 54: 192-7.
3. Anonymous. Investigators, anaesthesia and ethics. Anaesthesia 2000; 55: 521-2.
4. Haden RM, Scott PV. Second and subsequent operations within 12 months of a first operation. Anaesthesia, 2004: 59: 332-6.
5. Gillon R. Ethics needs principles -four can encompass the rest - and respect for autonomy should be 'first among equals'. Journal of Medical Ethics 2003; 29: 307-12.
6. Richards T. Court sanctions use of anonymised patient data. British Medical Journal 2000; 320: 77.
7. Yentis SM. Bad research is not audit. Lancet 1996; 347: 330.