Technological Convergence and Trade Patterns

Review of World Economics

Volumn 139, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 191-219

  Stehrer, Robert ^a   Wörz, Julia ^a  

^a The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies   (Austria)

Author keywords

Catching up; Dynamics of comparative advantage; Trade and technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 2342447998     PISSN: 16102878     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02659743     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Barro, R., and X. Sala-i-Martin (1995). Economic Growth. New York: McGraw-Hill.
2. Bernard, A. B., and C. I. Jones (1996a). Comparing Apples to Oranges: Productivity Convergence and Measurement across Industries and Countries. American Economic Review 86 (5): 1216-1238.
3. Bernard, A. B., and C. I. Jones (1996b). Technology and Convergence. Economic Journal 106 (July): 1037-1044.
4. Bernard, A. B., and C. I. Jones (2001). Comparing Apples to Oranges: Productivity Convergence and Measurement across Industries and Countries: Reply. American Economic Review 91 (4): 1168-1169.
5. Fagerberg, J. (1988). International Competitiveness. Economic Journal 98 (June): 355-374.
6. Friedman, M. (1992). Do Old Fallacies Ever Die? Journal of Economic Literature 30 (4): 2129-2132.
7. Fujita, M., P. Krugman, and A. Venables (1999). The Spatial Economy. Cities, Regions and International Trade. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
8. Gerschenkron, A. (1952). Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. In B. F. Hoselitz (ed.), The Progress of Underdeveloped Areas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Grupp, H. (1994). The Measurement of Technical Performance of Innovations by Technometrics and Its Impact on Established Technology Indicators. Research Policy 23 (2): 175-193.
10. Grupp, H. (1998). Foundations of the Economics of Innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
11. Hart, P. E. (1995). Galtonian Regressions across Countries and the Convergence of Productivity. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 57 (3): 287-294.
12. Hatzichronoglou, T. (1997). Revision of the High-Technology Sector and Product Classification. STI Working Paper. OECD/GD(97)/216, Paris.
13. Krugman, P. (1986). A 'Technology Gap' Model of International Trade. In K. Jungenfeldt and D. Hague (eds.), Structural Adjustment in Developed Open Economies. London: Macmillan.
14. Landesmann, M. A., and R. Stehrer (2001). Convergence Patterns and Switchovers in Comparative Advantage. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 12 (4): 399-423.
15. Laursen, K. (2000). Trade Specialization, Technology and Economic Growth. Theory and Evidence from Advanced Countries. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
16. Quah, D. (1993). Galton's Fallacy and Tests of the Convergence Hypothesis. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 95 (4): 427-443.
17. Quah, D. (1996). Twin Peaks: Growth and Convergence in Models of Distribution Dynamics. Economic Journal 106 (July): 1045-1055.
18. Sala-i-Martin, X. (1996). The Classical Approach to Convergence Analysis. Economic Journal 106 (July): 1019-1036.
19. Sorenson, A. (2001). Comparing Apples and Oranges: Productivity Convergence and Measurement across Industries and Countries: Comment. American Economic Review 91 (4): 1161-1167.
20. Stehrer, R., M. A. Landesmann, and J. Burgstaller (2000). Catching-Up at the Industrial Level - Prospects for CEECs. In M. A. Landesmann (ed.), Structural Developments in Central and Eastern Europe. Vienna: WIIW.
21. Timmer, M. P. (2000). The Dynamics of Asian Manufacturing. A Comparative Perspective 1963-1993. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
22. Vollrath, R. (1991). A Theoretical Evaluation of Alternative Trade Intensity Measures of Revealed Comparative Advantages. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv/Review of World Economics 127 (2): 265-280.