Transfer of learning between 3D modeling systems

Engineering Design Graphics Journal

Volumn 67, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 15-

  Wiebe, Eric N ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS; ENGINEERING DRAWINGS; MODELING STRATEGY;

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; DATABASE SYSTEMS; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PERSONNEL TRAINING; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 2342446590     PISSN: 00462012     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369406.
2. Arnold, E., & Bessant, J. (1983). Oiling the wheels of technical change: Skills, training and the adoption of computer aided design. In J. Rijnsdorp (Ed.), Training for tomorrow: Evaluational aspects of computerized automation (IFAC/IFIP Conference), (pp. 123-127). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
3. Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, J. K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41, 63-101.
4. Bertoline, G. R., & Wiebe, E. N. (2002). Fundamentals of graphies communication. (3 ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
5. Carroll, J. M., & Olson, J. R. (1990). Mental models in human-computer interaction. In M. Hellander (Ed.), Handbook of human-computer interaction, (pp. 45-65). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
6. Kato, T. (1986). What "question asking protocols" can say about the user interface. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 25, 659-673.
7. Klein, K. J., Hall, R. J., & Laliberte, M. (1990). Training and the organizational consequences of technological change: A case study of computer-aided design and drafting. In U. E. Gattiker & L. Larwood (Eds.), End-user training. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
8. Mack, R., & Robinson, J. B. (1992). When novices elicit knowledge: Question asking in designing, evaluating, and learning to use software. In R. R. Hoffman (Ed.), The psychology of expertise: Cognitive research and empirical AI, (pp. 245-268). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
9. McQueen, M., Barr, R., Krueger, T. J., & Traver, A. E. (2001). A comparative study of students' use of three popular solid modeling packages. Paper presented at the Engineering Design Graphics Division Mid-Year Meeting, San Antonio, TX.
10. Schumacher, R. M., & Czerwinski, M. P. (1992). Mental models and the acquisition of expert knowledge. In R. R. Hoffman (Ed.), The psychology of expertise: Cognitive research and empirical AI, (pp. 61-79). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
11. Shneiderman, B. (1998). Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction. (3rd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
12. Sorby, S. A., & Hamlin, B. H. (2001). A comparison of two commercial constraintbased modelers for use in an engineering graphics course. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 65(1), 30-38.
13. van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M. (1982). Categories and sequences of behavior: Methods of description and analysis. In K. R. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.), Handbook of methods in nonverbal behavior research, (pp. 362-439). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge U. Press.
14. Waern, Y. (1993). Varieties of learning to use computer tools. Computers in Human Behavior, 9 (2-3), 323-339.
15. Wiebe, E. N. (1999). 3-D constraint-based modeling: Finding common themes. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 63(3), 15-31.