An analysis of the relationship between probation caseloads and property crime rates in California counties

Journal of Criminal Justice

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 231-241

  Worrall, John L ^a   Schram, Pamela ^a   Hays, Eric ^b   Newman, Matthew ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b California Inst for County Govt   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2342446015     PISSN: 00472352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2004.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Allen H.E. Eskridge C.W. Latessa E.J. Vito G.F. Probation and parole effectiveness In Allen H.E. Eskridge C.W. Latessa E.J. Vito G.F. (Eds.), Probation and parole in America 1985 Free Press New York
2. Baller R.D. Anselin L. Messner S.F. Deane G. Hawkins D.F. Structural covariates of U.S. county homicide rates: Incorporating spatial effects Criminology 39 2001 561-590
3. Banks J. Porter A.L. Rardin R.L. Silver T.R. Unger V.E. Summary phase I evaluation of intensive special probation project 1977 National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Washington, DC
4. Bastian L.D. Criminal victimization 1992 1993 Bureau of Justice Statistics Washington, DC
5. Byrne, J. M., & Kelly, L. (1989). An evaluation of the implementation and impact of the Massachusetts intensive probation supervision program. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice. Unpublished report.
6. Byrne J.M. Lurigio A.J. Baird C. The effectiveness of the new Intensive Supervision Programs Research in Corrections 2 1989 1-56
7. California Board of Corrections. (2002). Jail profile summary. Retrieved from http://www.bdcorr.ca.gov/fsod/jail%20profile%20summary/ jail_profile_survey.htm
8. California Department of Corrections. (2002). CDC facts. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.state.ca.us/factsht.htm
9. Cameron S. The economics of crime deterrence: A survey of theory and evidence Kyklos 41 1988 301-323
10. Camp G.M. Camp C. The corrections yearbook 1995: Probation and parole 1995 Criminal Justice Institute South Salem, NY
11. Carter R.M. Robinson J. Wilkins L. The San Francisco project: A study of federal probation and parole - final report 1967 University of California Press Berkeley
12. Carter R.M. Wilkins L.T. Caseloads: Some conceptual models In Carter R.M. Wilkins L.T. (Eds.), Probation, parole, and community corrections 1984 34-56 John Wiley New York
13. Cherry T.L. Unobserved heterogeneity bias when estimating the economic model of crime Applied Economics Letters 6 1999 753-757
14. Clear T.R. Dammer H.R. The offender in the community 2000 Wadsworth Belmont, CA
15. Cornwell C. Trumbull W.N. Estimating the economic model of crime with panel data The Review of Economics and Statistics 76 1994 360-366
16. Criminal Justice Statistics Center. (2000). Crime and delinquency in California. Sacramento: California Department of Justice, Criminal Justice Statistics Center. Retrieved from http://caag.state.ca.us/cjsc/publications/candd/cd00/tabs/cd00tb45.pdf
17. Cunniff, M. A., & Shilton, M. K. (1991). Variations on felony probation: Persons under supervision in 32 urban and suburban counties. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
18. Erwin B.S. Turning up the heat on probationers in Georgia Federal Probation 50 1986 17-24
19. Erwin B.S. Bennett L. New dimensions in probation: Georgia's experience with intensive probation supervision (IPS) (NCJ#102848) Research in Brief 1987 U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice Washington, DC
20. Geerken M.R. Hayes H.D. Probation and parole: Public risk and the future of incarceration alternatives Criminology 31 1993 549-564
21. Gillis A.R. So long as they both shall live: Marital dissolution and the decline of domestic homicide in France, 1852-1909 American Journal of Sociology 101 1996 1273-1305
22. Gove W.R. Hughes M. Geerken M. Are uniform crime reports a valid indicator of the index of crimes? An affirmative answer with minor qualifications Criminology 23 1986 451-501
23. Grant D.S. Martinez R. Crime and the restructuring of the U.S. economy: A reconsideration of class linkages Social Forces 75 1997 769-799
24. Greene J.R. Collins P. Kane R. Policing public housing in Philadelphia: Public safety perspectives of the police and the community Police Practice and Research 1 2000 397-434
25. Greene W.H. Econometric analysis 2nd ed. 1993 Macmillan New York
26. Guthrie D.J. From cultures of violence to social control: An analysis of violent crime in US counties with implications for social policy Berkeley Journal of Sociology 39 1995 67-99
27. Guynes R. Difficult clients, large caseloads plague probation, parole agencies (NCJ#113768) Research in Action 1988 U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice Washigton, DC
28. Hannon L. Defronzo J. The truly disadvantaged, public assistance, and crime Social Problems 45 1998 383-392
29. Harland A.T. Rosen C.J. Sentencing theory and intensive supervision probation Federal Probation 51 1987 33-42
30. Haynes P. Larsen C. Financial consequences of incarceration and alternatives Crime and Delinquency 30 1984 529-550
31. Hirschi T. Gottfredson M. Age and explanation of crime American Journal of Sociology 89 1983 552-584
32. Hsiao C. Analysis of panel data 1986 Cambridge University Press New York
33. Jolin A. Gibbons D.C. Age patterns in criminal involvement International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 31 1987 237-260
34. Jones P.R. The risk of recidivism: Evaluating the public-safety implications of a community corrections program Journal of Criminal Justice 19 1991 49-66
35. Kovandzic T.V. Sloan J.J.III Vieraitis L.M. Unintended consequences of politically popular sentencing policy: The homicide promoting effects of 'three strikes' in U.S. cities (1980-1999) Criminology and Public Policy 1 2002 399-424
36. Kowalski G.S. Duffield D. The impact of the rural population component on homicide rates in the United States: A county-level analysis Rural Sociology 55 1990 76-90
37. Kposowa A.J. Breault K.D. Reassessing the structural covariates of U.S. homicide rates: A county-level study Sociological Focus 26 1993 27-46
38. Kposowa A.J. Breault K.D. Hamilton B. Reassessing the structural covariates of violent and property crimes in the USA: A county-level analysis British Journal of Sociology 46 1995 79-105
39. Land K.C. McCall P.L. Cohen L.E. Structural covariates of homicide rates: Are there any invariances across time and space? American Journal of Sociology 4 1990 922-963
40. Langan P.A. Cunniff M.A. Recidivism of felons on probation, 1986-1989 [Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Rep.] 1992 U.S. Department of Justice Washington, DC
41. Latessa E.J. Allen H.E. Corrections in the community 1997 Anderson Cincinnati, OH
42. LeClair D.P. Guarino-Ghezzi S. Does incapacitation guarantee public safety? Lessons from Massachusetts' furlough and prerelease programs Justice Quarterly 8 1991 9-36
43. Loftin C. McDowall D.F. The police, crime, and economic theory: An assessment American Sociological Review 47 1982 393-401
44. Los Angeles County Planning Committee Managing offenders in Los Angeles County 1996 Author Los Angeles
45. Marvell T.B. Moody C.E. Specification problems, police levels, and crime rates Criminology 34 1996 609-646
46. McCarthy B.R. Intermediate punishments: Intensive supervision, home confinement, and electronic surveillance 1987 Willow Tree Monsey, NY
47. Pearson F. Harper A.G. Contingent intermediate sentences: New Jersey's intensive supervision program Crime and Delinquency 36 1990 75-86
48. Petee T.A. Kowalski G.S. Modeling rural violent crime rates: A test of social disorganization theory Sociological Focus 26 1993 87-89
49. Petersilia J. Community supervision: Trends and critical issues Crime and Delinquency 31 1985 339-347
50. Petersilia J. Probation and felony offenders Federal Probation 49 1985 4-9
51. Petersilia J. Implementing randomized experiments: Lessons from BJA's intensive supervision project Evaluation Review 13 1989 438-458
52. Petersilia J. Conditions that permit intensive supervision programs to survive Crime and Delinquency 36 1990 126-145
53. Petersilia J. A crime control rationale for reinvesting in community corrections Prison Journal 75 1995 479-496
54. Petersilia J. Probation in the United States In Tonry M. (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research 1997 149-200 University of Chicago Press Chicago
55. Petersilia J. A crime control rationale for reinvesting in community corrections In Petersilia J. (Ed.), Community corrections: Probation, parole, and intermediate sanctions 1998 20-28 Oxford University Press New York
56. Petersilia J. Turner S. Intensive supervision probation for high-risk offenders: Findings from three California experiments 1990 RAND Santa Monica, CA
57. Petersilia J. Turner S. Comparing intensive and regular supervision for high-risk probationers: Early results from an experiment in California Crime and Delinquency 36 1990 87-111
58. Petersilia J. Turner S. An evaluation of intensive probation in California Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 82 1991 610-658
59. Petersilia J. Turner S. Intensive probation and parole In Tonry M. (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research 1993 281-335 University of Chicago Press Chicago
60. Petersilia J. Turner S. Kahan J. Peterson J. Executive summary of RAND's study, 'Granting felons probation: Public risks and alternatives' Crime and Delinquency 31 1985 379-392
61. Phillips L. Votey H.L. Crime control in California Journal of Legal Studies 4 1975 327-350
62. Sampson R.J. Urban Black violence: The effect of male joblessness and family disruption American Journal of Sociology 93 1987 348-382
63. Shepherd J.M. Fear of the first strike: The full deterrent effect of California's two- and three-strikes legislation Journal of Legal Studies 31 2002 159-201
64. Steffensmeier D. Streifel C. Age, gender, and crime across three historical periods: 1935, 1960 and 1985 Social Forces 69 1991 869-894
65. Sutherland E.H. Cressey D.R. Luckenbill D.F. Principles of criminology 11th ed. 1992 General Hall New York
66. Turner S. Petersilia J. Deschenes E.P. Evaluating intensive probation/parole (ISP) for drug offenders Crime and Delinquency 38 1992 539-556
67. Whitehead J.T. The effectiveness of felony probation: Results from an eastern state Justice Quarterly 8 1991 525-543