Size of beef cows: Early ideas, new developments

Genetics and Molecular Research

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 51-63

  Arango, Jesus A ^a,c   Van Vleck, L Dale ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSIDAD CENTRAL DE VENEZUELA   (Venezuela)

Author keywords

Beef cattle; Covariance functions; Efficiency of growth; Longitudinal data; Optimal size; Random regression models

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL FOOD; BEEF CATTLE; BODY GROWTH; BODY SIZE; BREED DIFFERENCE; CATTLE FARMING; COVARIANCE; COW; DAIRY CATTLE; DAIRYING; ECONOMIC ASPECT; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GROWTH CURVE; HEREDITY; LEAN BODY WEIGHT; MEAT INDUSTRY; MILK; NONHUMAN; REVIEW; SEXUAL MATURATION; ANIMAL; BODY COMPOSITION; BODY CONSTITUTION; CATTLE; ENVIRONMENT; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALIA; BOS TAURUS;

ANIMAL FEED; ANIMALS; BODY COMPOSITION; BODY CONSTITUTION; CATTLE; ENVIRONMENT; LINEAR MODELS;

EID: 2342445822     PISSN: 16765680     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4238/vol1-1gmr005     Document Type: Review

References (95)

1. Andersen, B.B. (1978). Animal size and efficiency, with special reference to growth and feed conversion in cattle. Anim. Prod. 27: 381-391.
2. Andersen, S. and Pedersen, B. (1996). Growth and food intake curves for group-housed gilts and castrated male pigs. Anim. Sci. 63: 457-464.
3. Arango, J.A. (2000). Genetic study of weight, height and body condition score in beef cows. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, NE., USA.
4. Archer, J.A., Herd, R.M., Arthur, P.F. and Parnell, P.F. (1998). Correlated responses in rate of maturation and mature size of cows and steers to divergent selection for yearling growth rate in Angus cattle. Livest. Prod. Sci. 54: 183-192.
5. Beltran, J.J., Butts Jr., W.T., Olson, T.A. and Koger, M. (1992). Growth patterns of two lines of Angus cattle selected using predicted growth parameters. J. Anim. Sci. 70: 734-741.
6. Berg, R.T. and Butterfield, R.M. (1976). New Concepts of Cattle Growth. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA, pp. 240.
7. Brinks, J.S. and Bourdon, R. (1993). Matching cattle to resources and fine-tuning the breeding program. In: Proceedings of Matching Beef Cattle to Western Environments, Phoenix, AZ, USA, pp. 122-137.
8. Brinks, J.S. and Miller, W.C. (1990). Optimizing cow size, milk level and labor by computer modeling. In: Proc. West. Sec. Am. Anim. Sci. 41: 152-155.
9. Brinks, J.S., Clark, R.T., Kieffer, N.M. and Urick, J.J. (1964). Estimates of genetic, environmental and phenotypic parameters in range Hereford females. J. Anim. Sci. 23: 711-716.
10. Brown, C.J., Johnson, Z.B. and Brown Jr., A.H. (1989). Between and within breed variation in mature weight and maturing interval of beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 67 (Suppl. 2): 9 (Abstract).
11. Brown, J.E., Brown, C.J. and Butts, W.T. (1972). A discussion on the genetic aspects of weight, mature weight and rate of maturing in Hereford and Angus cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 34: 525-537.
12. Brown, J.E., Fitzhugh Jr., H.A. and Cartwright, T.C. (1976). A comparison of nonlinear models for describing weight-age relationships in cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 42: 810-818.
13. Bullock, K.D., Bertrand, J.K. and Benyshek, L.L. (1993). Genetic and environmental parameters for mature weight and other growth measures in Polled Hereford cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 71: 1737-1741.
14. 1 cows of diverse biological type. J. Anim. Sci. 57 (Suppl. 1): 148 (Abstract).
15. Cundiff, L.V., Gregory, K.E., Koch, R.M. and Dickerson, G.E. (1986). Genetic diversity among cattle breeds and its use to increase beef production efficiency in a temperate environment. In: 3rd World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production (Johnson, R.K. and Dickerson, G.E., eds.). Lincoln, NE, USA, IX: 271-282.
16. Cundiff, L.V., Szabo, F., Gregory, K.E., Koch, R.M., Dikeman, M.E. and Crouse, J.D. (1993). Breed comparisons in the germplasm evaluation program at MARC. Presented at the Beef Improvement Federation 25th Anniversary Conference, Asheville, NC, USA, pp. 13.
17. DeNise, R.S.K. and Brinks, J.S. (1985). Genetic and environmental aspects of the growth curve parameters in beef cows. J. Anim. Sci. 61: 1431-1440.
18. Dickerson, G.E. (1970). Efficiency in animal production - molding the biological components. J. Anim. Sci. 30: 849-859.
19. Dickerson, G.E. (1978). Animal size and efficiency: basic concepts. Anim. Prod. 27: 367-379.
20. Doren, P.E., Baker, J.F., Long, C.R. and Cartwright, T.C. (1989). Estimating parameters of growth curves of bulls. J. Anim. Sci. 67: 1432-1445.
21. Ferrell, C.L. and Jenkins, T.G. (1985). Cow type and the nutritional environment: Nutritional aspects. J. Anim. Sci. 61: 725-741.
22. Fiss, C.F. and. Wilton, J.W. (1989). Effects of breeding system, cow weight and milk yield on reproductive performance in beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 67: 1714-1721.
23. Fiss, C.F. and Wilton, J.W. (1992). Contribution of breed, cow weight and milk yield to the traits of heifers and cows in four breeding systems. J. Anim. Sci. 70: 3686-3696.
24. Fiss, C.F. and Wilton, J.W. (1993). Contribution of breed, cow weight and milk yield to the preweaning, feedlot, and carcass traits of calves in three beef breeding systems. J. Anim. Sci. 71: 2874-2884.
25. Fitzhugh, H.A. (1978). Animal size and efficiency, with special reference to the breeding female. Anim. Prod. 27: 393-401.
26. Fitzhugh, H.A. and Taylor St., C.S. (1971). Genetic analysis of degree of maturity. J. Anim. Sci. 33: 717-725.
27. Fitzhugh Jr., H.A. (1976). Analysis of growth curves and strategies for altering their shape. J. Anim. Sci. 42: 1036-1051.
28. Gilmour, A.R., Cullis, B.R. and Welham, S.J. (1999). ASREML Reference Manual, pp. 210. Available at: fttp://ftp.res.bbrsc.ac.uk/pub/aar/. Accessed Nov. 15, 1999.
29. 1 cross cows. J. Anim. Sci. 69: 3156-3166.
30. Green, R.D., Cundiff, L.V. and Dickerson, G.E. (1991b). Life-cycle biological efficiency of Bos indicus-Bos taurus and Bos taurus crossbred cow-calf production to weaning. J. Anim. Sci. 69: 3544-3563.
31. Grizzle, J.E. and Allen, D.M. (1969). Analysis of growth and dose response curves. Biometrics 25: 357-381.
32. Henderson Jr., C.R. (1982). Analysis of covariance in the mixed model: higher-level, nonhomogeneous, and random regression. Biometrics 38: 623-640.
33. Humes, P.E. and Munyakazi, L. (1989). Size and production relationship in crossbred beef cattle. Louisiana Agric. 33: 12-13.
34. Jamrozik, J. and Schaeffer, L.R. (1997). Estimates of genetic parameters for test-day model with random regression for yield traits of first lactating Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 80: 762-770.
35. Jeffery, H.B. and Berg, R.T. (1972). An evaluation of several measurements of beef cow size as related to progeny performance. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 52: 23-37.
36. Jenkins, T.G., Kaps, M., Cundiff, L.V. and Ferrell, C.L. (1991). Evaluation of between and within-breed variation in measures of weight-age relationships. J. Anim. Sci. 69: 3118-3128.
37. Jennrich, R.I. and Schluter, M.D. (1986). Unbalanced repeated-measure models with structured covariance matrices. Biometrics 42: 805-820.
38. Johnson, Z.B., Brown, C.J. and Brown Jr., A.H. (1990). Evaluation of growth patterns of beef cattle. Arkansas Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. No. 923, pp. 41.
39. Johnson, Z.B., Brown, C.J. and Brown Jr., A.H. (1991). Optimum beef cow size for production resources in Northern Arkansas. Arkansas Agric. Exp. Stn. Spec. Rep. 151: 43-47.
40. Jones, H.E., White, I.M.S. and Brotherstone, S. (1999). Genetic evaluation of Holstein Friesian sires for daughter condition-score changes using a random regression model. J. Anim. Sci. 68: 467-475.
41. Kaps, M., Herring, W.O. and Lamberson, W.R. (1999). Genetic and environmental parameters for mature weight in Angus cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 77: 569-574.
42. Kirkpatrick, M. and Heckman, N. (1989). A quantitative genetic model for growth, shape, reaction norms, and other infinite-dimensional characters. J. Math. Biol. 27: 429-450.
43. Kirkpatrick, M., Lofsvold, D. and Bulmer, M. (1990). Analysis of the inheritance and evolution of growth trajectories. Genetics 124: 979-993.
44. Kirkpatrick, M., Hill, W.G. and Thompson, R. (1994). Estimating the covariance structure of traits during growth and aging, illustrated with lactation in dairy cattle. Genet. Res. 64: 57-69.
45. Koenen, E.P.C., Groen, A.F. and Gengler, N. (1999). Phenotypic variation in live weight and live-weight changes of lactation Holstein-Friesian cows. J. Anim. Sci. 68: 109-114.
46. Laird, N.M. and Ware, J.H. (1982). Random-effects model for longitudinal data. Biometrics 38: 963-974.
47. Lamb, M.A., Tess, M.W. and Robison, O. (1992). Evaluation of mating systems involving five breeds for integrated beef production systems: I. Cow-calf segment. J. Anim. Sci. 70: 689-699.
48. Laster, D.B., Smith, G.M. and Gregory K.E. (1976). Characterization of biological types of cattle. IV. Postweaning growth and puberty of heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 43: 63-70.
49. Lopez de la Torre, G., Candotti, J.J., Reverter, A., Bellido, M.M., Vasco, P., Garcia, L.J. and Brinks, J.S. (1992). Effects of growth parameters on cow efficiency. J. Anim. Sci. 70: 2668-2672.
50. MacNeil, M.D., Cundiff, L.V., Dinkel, C.A. and Koch, R.M. (1984). Genetic correlations among sex-limited traits in beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 58: 1171-1180.
51. Marshall, T.E., Mohler, M.A. and Stewart, T.S. (1984). Relationship of lifetime productivity with mature weight and maturation rate in Red Poll cows. Anim. Prod. 39: 383-387.
52. McMorris, M.R. and Wilton, J.W. (1986). Breeding system, cow weight and milk yield effects on various biological variables in beef production. J. Anim. Sci. 63: 1361-1372.
53. McMorris, M.R., Wilton, J.W. and Pfeiffer, W.C. (1986). Breeding system, cow weight and milk yield effects on various economic variables in beef production. J. Anim. Sci. 63: 1373-1383.
54. Meyer, K. (1991). Estimating variances and covariances for multivariate animal models by restricted maximum likelihood. Genet. Sel. Evol. 23: 67-83.
55. Meyer, K. (1995). Estimates of genetic parameters for mature weight of Australian beef cows and its relationship to early growth and skeletal measures. Livest. Prod. Sci. 44: 125-137.
56. Meyer, K. (1998a). Estimating covariance functions for longitudinal data using a random regression model. Genet. Sel. Evol. 30: 221-240.
57. Meyer, K. (1998b). 'DxMRR' - A program to estimate covariance functions for longitudinal data by Restricted Maximum Likelihood. In: Proceedings of the 6th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Armidale, Australia 27: 465-466.
58. Meyer, K. (1998c). Modeling 'repeated' records: Covariance functions and random regression models to analyze animal breeding data. In: Proceedings of the 6th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Armidale, Australia 27: 517-520.
59. Meyer, K. (1998d). DFREML - version 3.0 B - User Notes (Mimeo), pp. 29. Available at: ftp://metz.une.edu.au/pub/agbu/DFREML. Accessed Sept. 30, 1999.
60. Meyer, K. (1999a). Estimates of genetic and phenotypic covariance functions for postweaning growth and mature weight of beef cows. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 116: 181-205.
61. Meyer, K. (1999b). Random regression to model phenotypic variation in monthly weights of Australian beef cows (Mimeo) 19 pp + Tables and Graphics. Available at: ftp://agbu.une.edu.au/~kmeyer/. Accessed Sept. 30, 1999.
62. Meyer, K. (2000). Random regression to model phenotypic variation in monthly weights of Australian beef cows. Livest. Prod. Sci. 65: 19-38. Also available at: ftp://metz.une.edu.au/pub/agbu/Papers/phnrrm.ps.gz. Accessed May 16, 2000.
63. Meyer, K. and Hill, W.G. (1997). Estimation of genetic and phenotypic covariance functions for longitudinal or 'repeated' records by restricted maximum likelihood. Livest. Prod. Sci. 47: 185-200.
64. Meyer, K. and Smith, S.P. (1996). Restricted maximum likelihood estimation for animal models using derivatives of the likelihood. Genet. Sel. Evol. 28: 23-49.
65. Mezzadra, C.A. and Miquel, M.C. (1994). Heterosis and breed transmitted effects in growth curve parameters in Angus, Criollo and reciprocal crossbred cows. In: Proceedings of the 5th World Congress on Genetic Applied to Livestock Production (Smith, C., Gavora, J.S., Benkel, B., Chesnais, J., Fairfull, W., Gibson, J.P., Kennedy, B.W. and Burnside, E.B., eds.). Guelph, Canada 17: 276-279.
66. Montaño-Bermudez, M., Nielsen, M.K. and Deutscher, G.H. (1990). Energy requirements for maintenance of crossbred beef cattle with different genetic potential for milk. J. Anim. Sci. 68: 2279-2288.
67. Morris, C.A. and Wilton, J.W. (1975). Influence of mature cow weight on economic efficiency of cows. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 55: 233-250.
68. Morris C.A. and Wilton, J.W. (1976). The influence of body size on the biological efficiency of cows: A review. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 56: 613-647.
69. Morris C.A. and Wilton, J.W. (1977). The influence of body size on the economic efficiency of cows: A review. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 45: 139-153.
70. Morrow, R.E., McLaren, J.B. and Butts, W.T. (1978). Effect of age on estimates of bovine growth curve parameters. J. Anim. Sci. 47: 352-357.
71. Nelsen, T.C., Long, C.R. and Cartwright, T.C. (1982). Postinflection growth in straightbred and crossbred cattle. I. Heterosis for weight, height and maturing rate. J. Anim. Sci. 55: 2280-2292.
72. Northcutt, S.L. and Wilson, D.E. (1993). Genetic parameters and expected progeny differences for mature size in Angus cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 71: 1148-1153.
73. Notter, D.R., Sanders, J.O. and Dickerson, G.E. (1979). Simulated efficiency of beef production for a Midwestern cow-calf-feedlot management system. II. Mature body size. J. Anim. Sci. 49: 83-91.
74. Parks, J.R. (1982). A Theory of Feeding and Growth of Animals. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, pp. 322.
75. Peroto, D., Castanho, M.J. de P., Cubas, A.C., Rocha, J.L. and Pinto, J.M. (1997). Efeitos genéticos sobre as estimativas dos parâmetros das curvas de crescimento de fêmeas bovinas Gir, Guzera, Holandes x Gir e Holandes x Guzera. Rev. Bras. Zoot. 26: 719-725.
76. Petit, M. and Lienard, G. (1988). Performance characteristics and efficiency of various types of beef cows in French production system. In: 3rd World Congress of Sheep and Beef Cattle Breeding. Paris, France 2: 25-51.
77. Pitchford, W.S., Barlow, R. and Hearnshaw, H. (1993). Growth and calving performance of cows from crosses between the Brahman and Hereford. Livest. Prod. Sci. 33: 141-150.
78. Rao, C.R. (1965). The theory of the least squares when the parameters are stochastic and its application to the analysis of growth curves. Biometrika 52: 447-458.
79. Sandland, R.L. and McGilchrist, C.A. (1979). Stochastic growth curve analysis. Biometrics 35: 255-271.
80. Schaeffer, L.R. (1999). Random regression models. Class Notes, pp. 20. Available at: http://www.aps.uoguelph.ca/~lrs/animalz/lesson.14/ Accessed Nov. 21, 2000.
81. Schaeffer, L.R. and Dekkers, J.C.M. (1994). Random regression in animal models for test-day production in dairy cattle. In: Proceedings of the 5th World Congress on Genetic Applied to Livestock Production (Smith, C., Gavora, J.S., Benkel, B., Chesnais, J., Fairfull, W., Gibson, J.P., Kennedy, B.W. and Burnside, E.B., eds.). Guelph, Canada 18: 443-446.
82. Seifert, G.W. and Rudder, T.H. (1975). The genetic implications of selecting cattle for large size. In: Principles of Cattle Production (Swan, H. and Broster, W.H., eds.). Butterworths & Co. Ltd., London, UK., pp. 373-386.
83. Smith, G.M., Fitzhugh Jr., H.A., Cundiff, L.V., Cartwright, T.C. and Gregory, K.E. (1976a). A genetic analysis of maturing patterns in straightbred and crossbred Hereford, Angus and Shorthorn cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 43: 389-395.
84. Smith, G.M., Fitzhugh Jr., H.A., Cundiff, L.V., Cartwright, T.C. and Gregory, K.E. (1976b). Heterosis for maturing weight patterns in Hereford, Angus and Shorthorn cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 43: 380-388.
85. Southgate, J.R., Cook, G.L. and Kempster, A.J. (1982). A comparison among different breed and crosses from the suckler herd. Anim. Prod. 35: 87-98.
86. Stewart, T.S. and Martin, T.G. (1983). Optimal mature size of Angus cows for maximum cow productivity. Anim. Prod. 37: 179-182.
87. Taylor, C.R., Caldwell, S.L. and Rowntree, V.J. (1972). Running up and down hills. Some consequences of size. Science 178: 1096-1097.
88. Taylor St., C.S. (1973). Genetic differences in milk production in relation with mature body weight. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. (New Series) 2: 15-26.
89. Taylor St., C.S. (1980). Genetically standardized growth equations. Anim. Prod. 30: 1167-1175.
90. Taylor St., C.S. (1985). Use of genetic size-scaling in evaluation of animal growth. J. Anim. Sci. 61 (Suppl. 2): 118-143.
91. van der Werf, J.H.J., Goddard, M.E. and Meyer, K. (1998). The use of covariance functions and random regression for genetic evaluation of milk production. J. Dairy Sci. 81: 3300-3308.
92. Varona, L., Moreno, C., Garcia-Cortes, L.A. and Altarriba, J. (1997). Multiple trait genetic analysis of underlying biological variables of production functions. Livest. Prod. Sci. 47: 201-210.
93. Warren, J.H., Schalles, R.R. and Milliken, G. (1980). A segmented line regression procedure to describe growth in beef cows. Growth 44: 160-166.
94. Wilson, D.E. (2000). Angus mature cow size genetic evaluation. In: 2000 Angus Sire Evaluation. American Angus Association. Available at: http://www.ccp.com./~angus/sireeval/mature.htm. Accessed February 15, 2000.
95. Wishart, J. (1938). Growth-rate determinations in nutrition studies with the bacon pig and their analysis. Biometrics 30: 16-28.