Rotating dilaton black holes with hair

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 69, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 30-

  Kleihaus, Burkhard ^a   Kunz, Jutta ^b   Navarro Lérida, Francisco ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2342426637     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.064028     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. W. Israel, Commun. Math. Phys. 8, 245 (1968)
2. D. C. Robinson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 905 (1975)
3. P. Mazur, J. Phys. A 15, 3173 (1982).
4. M. Heusler, Black Hole Uniqueness Theorems (Cambrigde University Press, Cambridge, England, 1996).
5. M. S. Volkov and D. V. Galt’sov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 51, 747 (1990)
6. P. Bizon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2844 (1990)
7. H. P. Künzle and A. K. M. Masoud-ul-Alam, J. Math. Phys. 31, 928 (1990).
8. See, e.g., M. S. Volkov and D. V. Gal’tsov, Phys. Rep. 319, 1 (1999)
9. D. V. Gal’tsov, hep-th/0112038, in Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on General Relativity and Gravitation, Durban, South Africa, 2001.
10. B. Kleihaus and J. Kunz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1595 (1997)
11. B. KleihausJ. KunzPhys. Rev. D 57, 6138 (1998).
12. B. Kleihaus and J. Kunz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3704 (2001)
13. B. Kleihaus, J. Kunz, and F. Navarro-Lérida, Phys. Rev. D 66, 104001 (2002).
14. B. Kleihaus, J. Kunz, and F. Navarro-Lérida, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 171101 (2003).
15. G. W. Gibbons and K. Maeda, Nucl. Phys. B298, 741 (1988)
16. D. Garfinkle, G. T. Horowitz, and A. Strominger, Phys. Rev. D 43, 3140 (1991).
17. G. W. Gibbons and K. Maeda, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 167, 201 (1986)
18. V. Frolov, A. Zelnikov, and U. Bleyer, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 44, 371 (1987).
19. D. Rasheed, Nucl. Phys. B454, 379 (1995).
20. J. H. Horne and G. T. Horowitz, Phys. Rev. D 46, 1340 (1992).
21. E. E. Donets and D. V. Gal’tsov, Phys. Lett. B 302, 411 (1993)
22. G. Lavrelashvili and D. Maison, Nucl. Phys. B410, 407 (1993).
23. M. S. Volkov and N. Straumann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1428 (1997).
24. A. Ashtekar (private communication).
25. M. Heusler and N. Straumann, Class. Quantum Grav. 10, 1299 (1993)
26. M. HeuslerN. StraumannPhys. Lett. B 315, 55 (1993).
27. L. Smarr, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 71 (1973)
28. L. SmarrPhys. Rev. D 7, 289 (1973).
29. B. Kleihaus, J. Kunz, and F. Navarro-Lérida Phys. Rev. D (to be published); also (in preparation).
30. D. Kramer, H. Stephani, E. Herlt, and M. MacCallum, Exact Solutions of Einstein’s Field Equations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England 1980)
31. P. Forgàcs and N. S. Manton, Commun. Math. Phys. 72, 15 (1980).
32. J. J. van der Bij and E. Radu, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 17, 1477 (2002).
33. W. Kundt and M. Trümper, Z. Phys. 192, 419 (1966).
34. A. Papapetrou, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincare, Sect. A 4, 83 (1966).
35. R. M. Wald, General Relativity (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984).
36. Alternatively, the gauge transformation (Formula presented) yields the gauge potential (Formula presented)
37. F. J. Chinea and F. Navarro-Lérida, Phys. Rev. D 65, 064010 (2002).
38. B. Kleihaus and J. Kunz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2527 (1997)
39. B. KleihausJ. KunzPhys. Rev. D 57, 834 (1998).
40. A. Ashtekar, Ch. Beetle, and J. Lewandowski, Phys. Rev. D 64, 044016 (2001).
41. L. F. Abbott and S. Deser, Phys. Lett. 116B, 259 (1982)
42. J. D. E. Creighton and R. B. Mann, Phys. Rev. D 52, 4569 (1995).
43. A. Corichi and D. Sudarsky, Phys. Rev. D 61, 101501 (2000)
44. Phys. Rev. DA. Corichi, U. Nucamendi, and D. Sudarsky, 62, 044046 (2000).
45. B. Kleihaus and J. Kunz, Phys. Rev. D 61, 107503 (2000).
46. The gauge transformation is (Formula presented)
47. W. Schönauer and R. Weiß, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 27, 279 (1989);M. Schauder, R. Weiß, and W. Schönauer, The CADSOL Program Package, Universität Karlsruhe, Interner Bericht Nr. 46/92, 1992.
48. The perturbative calculations of 13 indicate a sign change of Q for (Formula presented) (Formula presented) black hole solutions: however, the nonperturbative calculations do not show such a change of sign.
49. O. Brodbeck, M. Heusler, N. Straumann, and M. S. Volkov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4310 (1997)
50. O. Brodbeck and M. Heusler, Phys. Rev. D 56, 6278 (1997).
51. This is to be expected in EYM theory, since globally regular rotating solutions would have to satisfy a different set of boundary conditions at infinity 34. Nonperturbative numerical analysis, however, suggests 20 that no such globally regular rotating solutions exist.
52. B. Kleihaus, J. Kunz, and A. Sood, Phys. Rev. D 54, 5070 (1996).