The transplanting container-container (1+1) and container-bareroot (P+1) in Pinus greggii Engelm. Seedling production;El Trasplante Contenedor-contenedor (1+1) y Contenedor-raíz Desnuda (P+1) en la Producción de Planta de Pinus greggii Engelmn

Agrociencia

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 679-686

  Pineda Ojeda, Tomás ^a   Cetina Alcalá, Víctor M ^a   Vera Castillo, José A ^b   Cervantes Martínez, Cuauhtémoc T ^c   Khalil Gardezi, Abdul ^a  

^a Colegio de Postgraduados ^*  (Mexico)

^b INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIONES FORESTALES   (Mexico)

^c UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA CHAPINGO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Pinus greggii; Production systems; Seedling quality; Transplanting container bare root; Transplanting container container

Indexed keywords

MATTHIOLA INCANA; PINUS GREGGII;

EID: 23344454469     PISSN: 14053195     EISSN: 14053195     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Burdett, A. N. 1990. Physiological processes in plantation establishment and the development of specifications for forest planting stock. Can. Jour. For. Res. 20: 415-427.
2. Canell, M. G. R., F. E. Bridgwater, and M. S. Greenwood. 1978. Seedling growth rates, water stress responses and root-shoot relationships related to eight year volumes among families of Pinus taeda L. Silvae Genetica 27: 237-248.
3. Cetina, A. V. M. 1997. Tres tipos de manejo en vivero de Pinus greggii Engelm. y su efecto en la calidad de planta. Tesis Doctoral. Colegio de Postgraduados. Montecillo, México. 73 p.
4. Chew, V. 1976. Comparing treatment means: a compendium. HortScience 11 (4): 348-357.
5. Cleary, B. D., R. D. Greaves, and R. K. Hermann. 1978. Regeneration Oregon's Forest. A Guide for Regeneration Forest. Oregon State University. School of Forestry. Oregon. 242 p.
6. Dumroese, R. K., T. D. Landis, and D. L. Wenny. 1998. Raising Forest Tree Seedlings at Home: Simple Methods for Growing Conifers of the Pacific Northwest from Seeds. Contribution Number 860. Idaho Forest Wildlife and Range Experiment Station. USA. 54 p.
7. a ed. UNAM. México. 246 p.
8. a ed. John Wiley & Sons. USA. 680 p.
9. Hahn, P. F. 1984. Plug+1 seedling production. In: Forest Nursery Manual. Production of Bareroot Seedlings. Duryea, M. L., and T. D. Landis (eds). Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk Publishers. Oregon State University. Corvallis, Oregon. pp: 161-181.
10. Hobbs, S. D. 1984. The influence of species and stocktype selection on stand establishment: an ecophysiological perspective. In: Seedling Physiology and Reforestation Success. Duryea M. L., and G. N. Brown (eds). Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk Publishers. Great Britain. pp: 179-224.
11. Landis, T. D., R. W. Tinus, and J. P. Barnett. 1998. Seedling propagation. Vol. 6. The Container Tree Nursery Manual. Agriculture Handbook 674. USDA Forest Service. Washington. 166 p.
12. May, J. T. 1984. Seedling quality, grading, culling and counting. In: Southern Pine Nursery Handbook. May, J. T., W Belcher, Jr., C. E. Cordell, T. H. Filer, Jr., D. South, and C. W. Lantz, (eds). USDA. Forest Service. Southern Region, pp: 83-97.
13. Mexal, J. 1996. Forest Nursery Activities in México. In: National Proceedings, Forest and Conservation Nursery Associations. Landis, T.D., and D. B. South, (coords). Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-389. USDA, Forest Service. Pacific Northwest Research Station. Portland, Oregon, pp: 228-232.
14. Moench, R. D. 1993. Plug + one production of Colorado Blue Spruce at the Colorado State Forest Service Nursery. In: Proceedings, Northeastern and Intermountain Forest Nursery Associations. Landis, T. D. (coord.). Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-243. Ft. Collins, CO: USDA, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, pp: 11-112.
15. Owston, P. W. 1990. Target seedling specifications: Are stock type designations useful?. In: Proceedings, Western Forest Nursery Association. Rose, R., S. J. Campbell, T. D. Landis (eds). Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-200. Colorado, U.S.A. USDA, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, pp: 9-16.
16. Prieto, R. J. A., G. Vera C., y E. Merlín B. 1999. Factores que influyen en la calidad de plantas y criterios para su evaluación. Folleto técnico 12. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales y Agropecuarias. México. 23 p.
17. Ritchie, G. A. 2002. Root physiology and phenology: the key to transplanting success. In: National Proceedings: Forest and Conservation Nursery Associations. Riley L. E., R. Dumroese K., and T. D. Landis (coords). USDA Forest Service. http://www.fcnanet.org/proceedings/2002/ritchie.pdf.
18. Rose, R. D., and L. Hasse. 1995. The target seedling concept: implementing a program. In: National Proceedings, Forest and Conservation Nursery Associations. Landis, T. D., and B. Cregg. (coords.). Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-365. USDA. Forest Service. Pacific Northwest Research Station. Portland, Oregon. pp: 124-130.
19. Scaegel, R., M. Madill, C. Kooistra, and R. Bowden. 1998. Provincial Seedling Stock Type and Ordering Guidelines. Forest Service. Ministry of Forest, British Columbia. http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfp/pubs/stocktype/index.htm.
20. SAS Institute. 1993. SAS User's guide: Statistics. SAS Inst. Inc. Cary, North, Caroline. U.S.A. 1022 p.
21. Sierra, P. A., y D. A. Rodríguez. 1996. Evaluación de plantaciones forestales COCODER (1983-1986). México. Mimeografiado. 23 p.
22. Thompson, B. E. 1985. Seedling morphological evaluation- what you can tell by looking? In: Proceedings: evaluation seedling quality: principles, procedures, and predictive abilities of mayor test. Duryea, M. L. (ed.). Oregon State University. Corvallis, Oregon. U.S.A. pp: 59-71.