"Forensic fisheries science": Literature review and research suggestions

Marine Fisheries Review

Volumn 66, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 1-15

  Bryant, Beth C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FISHERY MANAGEMENT; LITERATURE REVIEW;

EID: 23344447818     PISSN: 00901830     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (74)

1. Ackerman, S. 1990. Observations on the transformation of the Forest Service: the effects of the NEPA on U.S. Forest Service decision making. Environ. Law 20:703-734.
2. Adler, P. S. 2002. Science, politics, and problem solving: principles and practices for the resolution of environmental disputes in the midst of advancing technology, uncertain or changing science, and volatile public perceptions. Pa. State Environ. Law Rev. 10:323-344.
3. Bass, R. E., A. I. Herson, and K. M. Bogdan. 2001. The NEPA book: a step-by-step guide on how to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act. Solano Press Books, Point Arena, CA, 475 p.
4. Blumenthal, J. A. 2002. Law and social science in the 21st century. South. Calif. Interdiscip. Law J. 12:1-53.
5. Bosselman, F. 2002. What lawmakers can learn from large-scale ecology. J. Land Use Environ. Law 17:207-325.
6. Brennan, M. J., D. E. Roth, M. D. Feldman, and A. R. Greene. 2003. Square pegs and round holes: application of the "best scientific data available" standard in the Endangered Species Act. 16 Tulane Environ. Law J. 387-444.
7. Caldwell, L. K. 1998. The National Environmental Policy Act: an agenda for the future. Ind. Univ. Press, Bloomington, Ind. 199 p.
8. Carr, C. J., and H. N. Scheiber. 2002. Dealing with a resource crisis: regulatory regimes for managing the world's marine fisheries. Stanford Environ. Law J. 21:45-79.
9. Cash, D. W., W. C. Clark, F. Alcock, N. M. Dickson, N. Eckley, D. H. Guston, J. Jäger, and R. B. Mitchell. 2003. Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100(14):8086-8091.
10. Caudill, D. S. 1999. Law and the science wars: introduction to the forum. South. Ill. Univ. Law J. 23:545-554.
11. Christie, D. R. 2004. Living marine resources management: a proposal for integration of United States management regimes. Environ. Law 34:107-174.
12. Clark, R., and L. Canter. 1997. Environmental policy and NEPA: past, present, and future. St. Lucie Press, Boca Raton, FL, 345 p.
13. Clark, R. N., E. E. Meidinger, G. Miller, J. Rayner, M. Laysen, S. Monreal, J. Fernandez, and M. Shannon. 1998. Integrating science and policy in natural resource management: lessons and opportunities from North America. U.S. Dep. Agric., U.S. Forest Serv., Pac. Northwest Res. Sta., Portland, Oreg., Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-441, 22 p.
14. Clark, T. W., P. Schuyler, T. Donnay, P. Curlee, T. Sullivan, M. Cymerys, L. Sheeline, R. P. Reading, R. L. Wallace, T. Kennedy Jr., A. Marcer-Batlle, and Y. De Fretes. 2002. Conserving biodiversity in the real world: professional practice using a policy orientation. Endangered Species Update, 19(4):156-161.
15. Coglianese, C., and G. E. Marchant. 2004. Shifting sands: the limits of science in setting risk standards. Univ. Pa. Law Rev. 152:1255-1360.
16. Condlin, R. J. 1999. "What's really going on?" A study of lawyer and scientist interdisciplinary discourse. Rutgers Comput. Technol. Law J. 25:181-191.
17. Cooper, J. C. 1993. Broad programmatic, policy and planning assessments under the NEPA and similar devices: a quiet revolution in an approach to environmental considerations. Pace Environ. Law Rev. 11:89-156.
18. CEQ. 1997. The National Environmental Policy Act: a study of its effectiveness after twenty-five years. Counc. Environ. Quality, Wash. D.C. 49 p.
19. CEQ. 2003. Modernizing NEPA implementation. Counc. Environ. Quality, Wash. D.C. 122 p.
20. Craig, R. K. 2002. Taking the long view of ocean ecosystems: historical science, marine restoration, and the Oceans Act of 2000. Ecol. Law Q. 29:649-705.
21. Doremus, H. 1997. Listing decisions under the Endangered Species Act: why better science isn't always better policy. Wash. Univ. Law Q. 75:1029-1153.
22. Doremus, H. 2001. Adaptive management, the Endangered Species Act, and the institutional challenges of "new age" environmental protection. Washburn Law J. 41:50-89.
23. Doremus, H. 2004. The purposes, effects, and future of the Endangered Species Act's best available science mandate. Environ. Law 34:397-450.
24. Fletcher, K. M. 2002. Fix it! Constructing a recommendation to the Ocean Commission for the future of fisheries. Roger Williams Univ. Law Rev. 8:93-133.
25. Flournoy, A. C. 1991. Legislating inaction: asking the wrong questions in protective environmental decisionmaking. Harvard Environ. Law Rev. 15:327-391.
26. Flournoy, A. C. 1994. Coping with complexity. Loyola Los Angeles Law Rev. 27:809-824.
27. Fox, C. R., and J. R. Irwin. 1998. The role of context in the communication of uncertain beliefs. Basic Appl. Social Psych. 20(1):57-70.
28. Halpern, M. 2002. Steller sea lions: the effects of multi-statute administration on the role of science in environmental management. U.C.L.A. J. Environ. Law Policy 19:449-506.
29. Heazle, M. 2004. Scientific uncertainty and the International Whaling Commission: an alternative perspective on the use of science in policy making. Mar. Pol. 28:361-374.
30. Jasanoff, S. 1982. Science, technology, and the limits of judicial competence. Jurimetrics J. 22:266-278.
31. Jasanoff, S. 1990. The fifth branch: science advisers as policymakers. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 302 p.
32. Jasanoff, S. 1992. What judges should know about the sociology of science. Jurimetrics J. 32:345-359.
33. Jasanoff, S. 1995. Science at the bar: law, science, and technology in America. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 285 p.
34. Kagan, R. A. 2001. Adversarial legalism: the American way of law. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 339 p.
35. Karkkainen, B. C. 2002a. Collaborative ecosystem governance: scale, complexity, and dynamism. Va. Environ. Law J. 21:189-243.
36. Karkkainen, B. C. 2002b. Toward a smarter NEPA: monitoring and managing government's environmental performance. Columbia Law Rev. 102:903-972.
37. Keiter, R. B. 1994. Beyond the boundary line: constructing a law of ecosystem management. Univ. Colo. Law Rev. 65:293-333.
38. Lach, D., P. List, B. Steel, and B. Schindler. 2003. Advocacy and credibility of ecological scientists in resource decisionmaking: a regional study. BioScience 2(53):170-178.
39. Langevoort, D. C. 1998. Behavioral theories of judgment and decisionmaking in legal scholarship: a literature review. Vanderbilt Law Rev. 51:1499-1540.
40. Lee, K. N. 1999. Appraising adaptive management. Conserv. Ecol. 3(2):3.
41. Macpherson, M. 2001. Integrating ecosystem management approaches into Federal fishery management through the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. Ocean Coast. Law J. 6:1-31.
42. Mashaw, J. L. 2003. Law and engineering: in search of the law-science problem. Yale Law J. 66:135-153.
43. Mattix, C., and K. Becker. 2002. Scientific uncertainty under the National Environmental Policy Act. Admin. Law Rev. 54:1125-1165.
44. Mattson, D. J. 1996. Ethics and science in natural resource agencies. BioScience 46(10):767-771.
45. McGarity, T. O. 2004. Our science is sound science and their science is junk science: science-based strategies for avoiding accountability and responsibility for risk-producing products and activities. Univ. Kansas Law Rev. 52:897-937.
46. Mills, T. J., and R. N. Clark. 2001. Roles of research scientists in natural resource decisionmaking. Forest Ecol. Manage. 153:189-198.
47. Mooney, C. 2004. Sucker punch: how conservatives are trying to use a conflict over obscure fish to gut the science behind the Endangered Species Act. Legal Affairs, May/June 2004, p. 23-25.
48. NAPA. 2002. Courts, congress, and constituencies: managing fisheries by default. Natl. Acad. Public Admin., Wash. D.C., 160 p.
49. NMFS. 1998. Supplemental EIS for groundfish total allowable catch specifications and prohibited species catch limits under the authority of the fishery management plans for the groundfish fishery of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Area and groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska. U.S. Dep. Commer., Natl. Ocean. Atmos. Admin., Natl. Mar. Fish. Serv., Alaska Region, Juneau.
50. NMFS. 2004. Final PSEIS for Alaskan groundfish fisheries. U.S. Dep. Commer., Natl. Ocean. Atmos. Admin., Natl. Mar. Fish. Serv., Alaska Region, Juneau.
51. NRC. 2004. Improving the use of the "best scientific information available" standard in fisheries management. Natl. Res. Counc., Natl. Acad. Press, Wash. D.C., 105 p.
52. Panelists. 2001. Panel Discussion. In Symposium: you win some, you lose some: the costs and benefits of litigation in fishery management. Ocean Coastal Law J. 7:5-74.
53. Pew Oceans Commission. 2003. America's living oceans: charting a course for sea change. Pew Oceans Commission, Arlington, Va., 144 p.
54. Pielke, R.A. 2004. When scientists politicize science: making sense of controversy over The Skeptical Environmentalist. Environ. Sci. Pol. 7:405-417.
55. Sarewitz, D. 1996. Frontiers of illusion: science, technology, and the politics of progress. Temple University Press, Phila., Pa., 233 p.
56. Sarewitz, D., R. A. Pielke Jr., and R. Byerly Jr. (Editors). 2000. Prediction: science, decision making, and the future of nature. Island Press, Wash., D.C., 405 p.
57. Sarewitz, D. 2004. How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environ. Sci. Policy 7:385-403.
58. Scheiber, H. N. 1997. From science to law to politics: an historical view of the ecosystem idea and its effect on resource management. Ecol. Law Q. 24:631-651.
59. Schuck, P. 1993. Multi-culturalism redux: science, law and politics. Yale Law Policy Rev. 11:1-46.
60. Shannon, M. A., E. E. Meidinger, and R. N. Clark. 1996. Science advocacy is inevitable: deal with it. Pap. prep. for ann. meet. Soc. Am. Foresters, 11 November 1996, Albuquerque, NM. Avail. at http:// www.law.buffalo.edu/homepage/eemeid/scholarship/saf961.html (accessed 7 January 2004).
61. Tarlock, A. D. 1994. The nonequilibrium paradigm in ecology and the partial unraveling of environmental law. Loyola Los Angeles Law Rev. 24:1121-1141.
62. Tarlock, A. D. 2002. Who owns science? Pa. St. Environ. Law Rev. 10:135-154.
63. Tarlock, A. D. 2003. Slouching toward Eden: the eco-pragmatic challenges of ecosystem revival. Minn. Law Rev. 87:1173-1208.
64. The H. John Heinz III Center for Science, Economics, and the Environment. 2000. Fishing grounds: defining a new era for American fisheries management. Island Press, Wash. D.C., 241 p.
65. Thompson Jr., B. H. 2000. Tragically difficult: the obstacles to governing the commons. Environ. Law 30:241-278..
66. U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy. 2004. An ocean blueprint for the 21st century: final report. Wash. D.C., 672 p.
67. Vaughan, D. 1996. The Challenger launch decision: risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA. Univ. Chicago Press, Chic., Ill., 575 p.
68. Volkman, J. 1999. How do you learn from a river? Managing uncertainty in species conservation policy. Wash. Law Rev. 74:719-762.
69. Volkman, J. M., and W. E. McConnaha. 1993. Through a glass, darkly: Columbia River salmon, the Endangered Species Act, and adaptive management. Environ. Law 23:1249-1272.
70. Wagner, W. E. 1995. The science charade in toxic risk regulation. Columbia Law Rev. 95:1613-1723.
71. Wagner, W. E. 1999. Congress, science, and environmental policy. Univ. Ill. Law Rev. 1999: 181-286.
72. Wagner, W. E. 2003. The "bad science" fiction: reclaiming the debate over the role of science in public health and environmental regulation. Law Contemp. Probl. 66:63-133.
73. Wallace, R. L. 2003. Social influences on conservation: lessons from U.S. recovery programs for marine mammals. Cons. Bio. 17(1):104-115.
74. Weinberg, A. M. 1972. Science and trans science. Minerva 10(2):209-222.