Tracking retinal motion with a scanning laser ophthalmoscope

Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 373-380

  Xu, Zhiheng ^a   Schuchard, Ronald ^b   Ross, David ^b   Benkeser, Paul ^a,c  

^a Emory University   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Block matching; Distortion; Eye tracking; Low vision; Manual registration; PRL; Rehabilitation; Retinal motion; Scotoma; SLO

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; ERROR ANALYSIS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LASER APPLICATIONS; OPHTHALMOLOGY;

PREFERRED RETINAL LOCUS (PRL); RETINAL MOTION; SCANNING LASER OPTHALMOSCOPE (SLO); VISUAL TASKS;

VISION;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EYE FIXATION; EYE TRACKING; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; MOTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA; SCANNING LASER OPHTHALMOSCOPE; SCOTOMA; TECHNIQUE; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LASERS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPHTHALMOSCOPES; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETINA; SOFTWARE;

EID: 23344439440     PISSN: 07487711     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2004.05.0058     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Guyton AC, Hall JE. Human physiology and mechanisms of disease. 6th ed. Philadelphia (PA): W.B. Saunders Company; 1997. p. 400-15.
2. Schuchard RA, Fletcher DC. Preferred retinal locus: A review with applications in low vision rehabilitation. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 1994;7(2):243-56.
3. Fletcher DC, Schuchard RA. Preferred retinal loci relationship to macular scotomas in a low vision population. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:632-38.
4. Fletcher DC, Schuchard RA, Watson G. Relative locations of macular scotomas near the PRL: Effect on low vision reading. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1999;36:356-64.
5. Schuchard RA, Cooper S, Lakshminarayanan V. Time series analysis of PRL movement during fixation. OSA Tech Digest Series. 1996;1:20-23.
6. Webb RH, Hughes GW, Delori FC. Confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Appl Opt. 1987;26:1492-99.
7. Peli E, Augliere RA, Timberlake GL. Feature-based registration of retinal images. IEEE Trans Med Im. 1987;6:272-78.
8. Wornson DP, Hughes GW, Webb RH. Fundus tracking with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Appl Opt. 1987; 26(8): 1500-504.
9. Hammer DX, Ferguson RD, Magill JC, White MA. Image stabilization for scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Opt Expr. 2002; 10(26): 1542-49.
10. Smith MJC, Docef A. A study guide for digital image processing. 2nd ed. Riverdale (GA): Scientific Publisher, Inc.; 1999. p. 333-34.
11. Bueno JM, Campbell MC. Confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy improvement by use of Mueller-matrix polarimetry. Opt Lett. 2002;27(10):830-32.
12. Timberlake GT, Sharma MK, Gobert DV, Maino JH. Distortion and size calibration of the scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO) laser-beam raster. Optom Vis Sci. 2003; 80(11):772-77.
13. Vasudevan R, Rhatak AV, Smith JD. A stochastic model for eye movements during fixation on a stationary target. Kybernetick. 1972;11:24-31.
14. Schuchard RA, Lim JM. Exploring the characteristics of secret eye movements during fixation: A new approach of chaotic time series. In: Lakshminarayana V, editor. Basic and clinical applications of vision science: The Professor Jay M. Enoch Festschrift volume. Amsterdam: Kluwer Publishing Group; 1997. p. 177-80.
15. Robinson DA, Gordon JL, Gordon SE. A model of the smooth pursuit eye movement system. Biolog Cybernet. 1986;55:43-57.