Print quality test methods for linerboard

Proceedings of the Technical Association of the Graphic Arts, TAGA

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 428-452

  Aspler, Joseph ^a  

^a PAPRICAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

Flexography; Linerboard; Profiling; Test method; Wettability

Indexed keywords

IMAGE QUALITY; OPTICAL CORRELATION; PAPER AND PULP MILLS; PAPERBOARDS; PRINTING PRESSES; WETTING;

BROWN LINERBOARDS; PROFILING; PROFILOMETRIC ROUGHNESS; SHEFFIELD ROUGHNESS;

PRINTING;

BOARD MILLS; CORRELATION; FLEXOGRAPHY; LINER BOARDS; PRINT QUALITY; PRINTING MACHINES; TEST METHODS; WETTABILITY;

EID: 23244464020     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Zang, Y.-H. and Aspler, J.S., Factors affecting flexo printability of liner/corrugated board and their laboratory testing, Tappi J., 78 (10):240-23 (1995).
2. Aspler, J.S., Ink-water-paper interactions in printing: An updated review. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Printing and Coating, Swansea, Wales, September 2000.
3. Aspler, J.S., Jordan, B.D., Zang. H., and Nguyen, N., Print quality of liner-board in commercial water-based flexography, 1998 Proc. of the Technical Association of the Graphic Arts, 749.
4. Lindström, C., Dölling, R. and Poustis, J., Evaluating the printability of linerboard for flexography, Paper Technol., 35 (8):38 (1994).
5. Chalmers, I.R., Flexographic printability of packaging grade papers, Proceedings of the 1997 APPITA Conference, APPITA, Melbourne, V. 1:335.
6. Waech, T.G., Measurement of non-uniformity by image analysis: Some linerboard applications, Proc. of the 1998 International Printing and Graphic Arts Conference, PAPT AC, Montreal, 135.
7. Parker, J.R., Backing member for a surface roughness tester, UK Patent Application GB 2,356,256, 16 May 2001.
8. Miller, B.W., Determining printability of linerboard manufactured for postprint converters using water-based flexographic ink, Proceedings of the 1997 Process and Product Quality Conference and Trade Fair, TAPPI Press, Atlanta, 135.
9. Gooding, R.W., Jordan, B.D. and MacPherson, S.C., The use of 3D profilometry to assess offset printability, Proc. of the 87th Annual Meeting of PAPT AC, PAPT AC, Montreal, B119 (2001).
10. Donderi, D.C. and Aspler, J.S., Proscale: A fast new way to measure subjective print and paper quality, Pulp Paper Can, 101 (5):T136 (2000).
11. Aspler, J.S., Cormier, L.M. and Manfred, A., Effect of surface chemistry and structure on flexographic ink holdout of linerboard, in preparation.
12. Aspler, J.S. and Beland, M.-C., A Review of Fibre Rising and Surface Roughening Effects in Paper, J Pulp Pap. Sci., 20:J27(1994).
13. Aspler, J.S., Dalphond, J.E., Glavas, J., and Raleigh, S., The effect of water in simulated offset and water-based gravure printing, Adv. Printing Sci. and Technol, 24:275 (1998).
14. Jensen, K.W., Flexo printability of coated white-top liner with consideration of convertability, Graphic Arts in Finland 18:14 (1989).
15. Johnson, J., The influence of moisture, temperature, pressure pulse, and substrate on print quality in flexographic printing, M.Sc. Thesis, Karlstad University, Sweden, 2003.
16. Bassemir, R.W. and Krishnan, R., Surface and colloidal aspects of dynamic ink/paper interactions during printing, Proceedings of the 1991 Paper Coating Fundamentals Symposium, CPPA, Montreal, QC, 69.