Reproducible and clinically meaningful differential diagnosis is possible between lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia and 'adenoma malignum' based on common histopathological criteria

Pathology International

Volumn 55, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 412-418

  Tsuda, Hitoshi ^a   Mikami, Yoshiki ^b   Kaku, Tsunehisa ^c   Hasegawa, Tadashi ^e   Akiyama, Futoshi ^f   Ohishi, Yoshihiro ^d   Sasajima, Yuko ^g   Kasamatsu, Takahiro ^g  

^a NATIONAL DEFENSE MEDICAL COLLEGE   (Japan)

^b TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^e NATIONAL CANCER CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Japan)

^f CANCER INSTITUTE   (Japan)

^g NATIONAL CANCER CENTER HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Adenocarcinoma in situ; Lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia; Minimal deviation adenocarcinoma ('adenoma malignum'); Uterine cervix

Indexed keywords

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADENOMA MALIGNUM; ARTICLE; CANCER SURVIVAL; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CELL PROLIFERATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; HYPERPLASIA; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA;

ADENOCARCINOMA; CERVIX UTERI; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HISTOCYTOCHEMISTRY; HUMANS; HYPERPLASIA; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 23244461576     PISSN: 13205463     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2005.01846.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. McKelvey JL, Goodlin RR. Adenoma malignum of the cervix. A cancer of deceptively innocent histological pattern. Cancer 1963; 16: 549-57.
2. Silverberg SG, Hurt G. Minimal deviation adenocarcinoma (adenoma malignum) of the cervix: A reappraisal. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1975; 121: 971-5.
3. Kaku T, Enjoji M. Extremely well-differentiated adenocarcinoma ('adenoma malignum') of the cervix. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1983; 2: 28-41.
4. Gilks CB, Young RH, Aguirre P, DeLellis RA, Scully RE. Adenoma malignum (minimal deviation adenocarcinoma) of the uterine cervix. Am J Surg Pathol 1989; 13: 717-29.
5. Shipman SD, Brislow RE. Adenocarcinoma in situ and early invasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Curr Opin Oncol 2001; 13: 394-8.
6. Ostor AG, Duncan A, Quinn M, Rome R. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: An experience with 100 cases. Gynecol Oncol 2000; 79: 207-10.
7. Anderson ES, Nielsen K. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: A prospective study of conization as definitive treatment. Gynecol Oncol 2002; 86: 365-9.
8. Jones MA, Young RH, Scully RE. Diffuse laminar endocervical glandular hyperplasia. A benign lesion often confused with adenoma malignum (minimal deviation adenocarcinoma). Am J Surg Pathol 1991; 15: 1123-9.
9. Nucci MR, Clement PB, Young RH. Lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia, not otherwise specified: A clinicopathologic analysis of thirteen cases of a distinctive pseudoneoplastic lesion and comparison with fourteen cases of adenoma malignum. Am J Surg Pathol 1999; 23: 886-91.
10. Mikami Y, Hata S, Fujiwara K, Imajo Y, Kohno I, Manabe T. Florid endocervical glandular hyperplasia with intestinal and pyloric gland metaplasia. Worrisome benign mimic of 'adenoma malignum'. Gynecol Oncol 1999; 74: 504-11.
11. Tsuda H, Okada S, Kasamatsu T. Is florid endocervical metaplasia adenoma malignum? Gynecol Oncol 2000; 77: 341-2.
12. Mikami Y, Kiyokawa T, Hata S et al. Gastrointestinal immunophenotype in adenocarcinomas of the uterine cervix and related glandular lesions: A possible link between lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia/pyloric gland metaplasia and 'adenoma malignum'. Mod Pathol 2004; 16: 962-72.
13. Tsuda H, Mikami Y, Kaku T et al. Interobserver variation in the diagnosis of adenoma malignum (minimal deviation adenocarcinoma) of uterine cervix. Pathol Int 2003; 53: 440-49.
14. Gilks CB, Young RH, Aguirre P, DeLellis RA, Scully RE. Adenoma malignum (minimal deviation adenocarcinoma) of the uterine cervix. A clinicopahological and immunohistochemical analysis of 26 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1989; 13: 717-29.
15. Fleiss JL. Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychol Bull 1971; 76: 378-82.
16. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159-74.
17. Peto P, Pike MC, Armitage P et al. Design and analysis of randomised clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. Br J Cancer 1977; 35: 1-39.
18. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958; 53: 457-81.
19. Yamashita Y, Takahashi M, Katabuchi H, Fukumatsu Y, Miyazaki K, Okamura H. Adenoma malignum: MR appearances mimicking nabothian cysts. AJR 1994; 162: 649-50.
20. Doi T, Yamashita Y, Yasunaga T et al. Adenoma malignum: MR imaging and pathologic study. Radiology 1997; 204: 39-42.